英国气象局有限区域数值天气预报系统中s型飞机观测的观测不确定性及其影响

IF 2.3 4区 地球科学 Q3 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Taejun Song, Joanne A. Waller, David Simonin
{"title":"英国气象局有限区域数值天气预报系统中s型飞机观测的观测不确定性及其影响","authors":"Taejun Song,&nbsp;Joanne A. Waller,&nbsp;David Simonin","doi":"10.1002/met.70036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Aircraft observations derived from Mode-Select Enhanced Surveillance (Mode-S EHS) reports are a valuable, high temporo-spatial resolution, source of upper-air information that can be assimilated into numerical weather prediction models. At present temperature and wind Mode-S EHS observations are assimilated into the Met Office's convection-permitting model, the UKV. These observations are obtained from two different sources, an inhouse set of receivers and via the European Meteorological Aircraft Derived Data Centre (EMADDC). Currently, Mode-S EHS data are assimilated using the same observation error standard deviation profiles as AMDAR data; however, differing observation processing is anticipated to result in differing error profiles for the Met Office and EMADDC data and for the AMDAR data. Therefore, we estimate new observation error statistics, including error correlations for the two types of Mode-S EHS data. We also consider the impact of the different aircraft data on the UKV analysis. We find that the observation error standard deviation profiles for wind and temperature are dependent on observation type and season and differ from the current profiles used in the assimilation. Additionally, the Mode-S EHS observation errors have a considerable spatial correlation that increases with height and is much longer than the spatial thinning distance. The estimated observation influence shows that Mode-S EHS data are not optimally assimilated, and that the use of updated, observation-type specific, error profiles is expected to improve the assimilation. The assimilation may be further optimized by modifying the observation thinning distance or including the correlated observation errors in the assimilation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49825,"journal":{"name":"Meteorological Applications","volume":"32 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/met.70036","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Observation uncertainty and impact of Mode-S aircraft observations in the Met Office limited area numerical weather prediction system\",\"authors\":\"Taejun Song,&nbsp;Joanne A. Waller,&nbsp;David Simonin\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/met.70036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Aircraft observations derived from Mode-Select Enhanced Surveillance (Mode-S EHS) reports are a valuable, high temporo-spatial resolution, source of upper-air information that can be assimilated into numerical weather prediction models. At present temperature and wind Mode-S EHS observations are assimilated into the Met Office's convection-permitting model, the UKV. These observations are obtained from two different sources, an inhouse set of receivers and via the European Meteorological Aircraft Derived Data Centre (EMADDC). Currently, Mode-S EHS data are assimilated using the same observation error standard deviation profiles as AMDAR data; however, differing observation processing is anticipated to result in differing error profiles for the Met Office and EMADDC data and for the AMDAR data. Therefore, we estimate new observation error statistics, including error correlations for the two types of Mode-S EHS data. We also consider the impact of the different aircraft data on the UKV analysis. We find that the observation error standard deviation profiles for wind and temperature are dependent on observation type and season and differ from the current profiles used in the assimilation. Additionally, the Mode-S EHS observation errors have a considerable spatial correlation that increases with height and is much longer than the spatial thinning distance. The estimated observation influence shows that Mode-S EHS data are not optimally assimilated, and that the use of updated, observation-type specific, error profiles is expected to improve the assimilation. The assimilation may be further optimized by modifying the observation thinning distance or including the correlated observation errors in the assimilation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49825,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Meteorological Applications\",\"volume\":\"32 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/met.70036\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Meteorological Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/met.70036\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meteorological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/met.70036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从模式选择增强监视(Mode-S EHS)报告中获得的飞机观测是一种有价值的、高时空分辨率的高空信息来源,可以吸收到数值天气预报模式中。目前,温度和风s型EHS观测数据被英国气象局的对流允许模式UKV同化。这些观测数据来自两个不同的来源,一套内部接收器和欧洲气象飞机衍生数据中心(EMADDC)。目前,Mode-S EHS数据的同化使用与AMDAR数据相同的观测误差标准差曲线;然而,不同的观测处理预计会导致Met Office和EMADDC数据以及AMDAR数据的不同误差曲线。因此,我们估计了新的观测误差统计量,包括两种s型EHS数据的误差相关性。我们还考虑了不同飞机数据对UKV分析的影响。我们发现风和温度的观测误差标准差曲线取决于观测类型和季节,并且与同化中使用的当前曲线不同。此外,Mode-S EHS观测误差随高度增加而增大,且远长于空间减薄距离。估计的观测影响表明,s型EHS数据没有得到最佳同化,使用更新的、特定于观测类型的误差曲线有望改善同化。通过修改观测细化距离或在同化中加入相关观测误差,可以进一步优化同化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Observation uncertainty and impact of Mode-S aircraft observations in the Met Office limited area numerical weather prediction system

Observation uncertainty and impact of Mode-S aircraft observations in the Met Office limited area numerical weather prediction system

Aircraft observations derived from Mode-Select Enhanced Surveillance (Mode-S EHS) reports are a valuable, high temporo-spatial resolution, source of upper-air information that can be assimilated into numerical weather prediction models. At present temperature and wind Mode-S EHS observations are assimilated into the Met Office's convection-permitting model, the UKV. These observations are obtained from two different sources, an inhouse set of receivers and via the European Meteorological Aircraft Derived Data Centre (EMADDC). Currently, Mode-S EHS data are assimilated using the same observation error standard deviation profiles as AMDAR data; however, differing observation processing is anticipated to result in differing error profiles for the Met Office and EMADDC data and for the AMDAR data. Therefore, we estimate new observation error statistics, including error correlations for the two types of Mode-S EHS data. We also consider the impact of the different aircraft data on the UKV analysis. We find that the observation error standard deviation profiles for wind and temperature are dependent on observation type and season and differ from the current profiles used in the assimilation. Additionally, the Mode-S EHS observation errors have a considerable spatial correlation that increases with height and is much longer than the spatial thinning distance. The estimated observation influence shows that Mode-S EHS data are not optimally assimilated, and that the use of updated, observation-type specific, error profiles is expected to improve the assimilation. The assimilation may be further optimized by modifying the observation thinning distance or including the correlated observation errors in the assimilation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Meteorological Applications
Meteorological Applications 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
62
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Meteorological Applications is to serve the needs of applied meteorologists, forecasters and users of meteorological services by publishing papers on all aspects of meteorological science, including: applications of meteorological, climatological, analytical and forecasting data, and their socio-economic benefits; forecasting, warning and service delivery techniques and methods; weather hazards, their analysis and prediction; performance, verification and value of numerical models and forecasting services; practical applications of ocean and climate models; education and training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信