一代又一代的“减震器”:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,照顾幼儿的女性及其为缓解粮食不安全状况所做的努力

IF 3.5 2区 社会学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
R. Lindberg, C. Parks, A. Bastian, A. L. Yaroch, F. H. McKay, P. van der Pligt, J. Zinga, S. A. McNaughton
{"title":"一代又一代的“减震器”:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,照顾幼儿的女性及其为缓解粮食不安全状况所做的努力","authors":"R. Lindberg,&nbsp;C. Parks,&nbsp;A. Bastian,&nbsp;A. L. Yaroch,&nbsp;F. H. McKay,&nbsp;P. van der Pligt,&nbsp;J. Zinga,&nbsp;S. A. McNaughton","doi":"10.1007/s10460-024-10646-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite their status as high-income food producing nations, children and their caregivers, both in the United States (U.S.) and Australia can experience food insecurity. Nutrition researchers formed a joint U.S.-Australia collaboration to help advance food security for households with young children aged 0–5 years. This study investigated food insecurity from the perspective of caregivers, especially their perceptions of the impact of food insecurity on their own childhood, their current life, and for the children in their care. Semi-structured interviews were conducted from July to September 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants were recruited in Omaha, Nebraska, U.S. (<i>n</i> = 19) and Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (<i>n</i> = 22), during periods of stay-at-home public health orders. These two case study sites enabled an exploration of some universal, and some context-specific, social, economic, and health conditions that buffer, or exacerbate, food insecurity for families in these neo-liberal political settings. An inductive thematic analysis was conducted and established six themes:<i>growing up poor</i>, <i>lessons learned</i>,<i> feeding a family amidst a pandemic</i>,<i> caregiver coping strategies</i>, <i>food security in the early years</i> and <i>protecting (young) children</i>. Perspectives on local anti-hunger strategies were organized to outline participant’s preferred solutions. Household food insecurity is conceptualized in public policy in the U.S. and Australia as a short-term crisis for people, justifying austere, time-limited and patchwork solutions. A narrative of caregivers’ lived experience of food insecurity suggests that it is inter-generational, and exacerbated by a food system shock (i.e., COVID-19). These findings from two varying cities and nations offer a different conceptualization of the timespan and nature of the phenomenon of food insecurity, challenging a dominant policy narrative and highlighting the inadequacy of current so-called solutions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7683,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Human Values","volume":"42 1","pages":"35 - 51"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10460-024-10646-4.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generations of ‘shock absorbers’: women caregivers of young children and their efforts to mitigate food insecurity during the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"R. Lindberg,&nbsp;C. Parks,&nbsp;A. Bastian,&nbsp;A. L. Yaroch,&nbsp;F. H. McKay,&nbsp;P. van der Pligt,&nbsp;J. Zinga,&nbsp;S. A. McNaughton\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10460-024-10646-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Despite their status as high-income food producing nations, children and their caregivers, both in the United States (U.S.) and Australia can experience food insecurity. Nutrition researchers formed a joint U.S.-Australia collaboration to help advance food security for households with young children aged 0–5 years. This study investigated food insecurity from the perspective of caregivers, especially their perceptions of the impact of food insecurity on their own childhood, their current life, and for the children in their care. Semi-structured interviews were conducted from July to September 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants were recruited in Omaha, Nebraska, U.S. (<i>n</i> = 19) and Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (<i>n</i> = 22), during periods of stay-at-home public health orders. These two case study sites enabled an exploration of some universal, and some context-specific, social, economic, and health conditions that buffer, or exacerbate, food insecurity for families in these neo-liberal political settings. An inductive thematic analysis was conducted and established six themes:<i>growing up poor</i>, <i>lessons learned</i>,<i> feeding a family amidst a pandemic</i>,<i> caregiver coping strategies</i>, <i>food security in the early years</i> and <i>protecting (young) children</i>. Perspectives on local anti-hunger strategies were organized to outline participant’s preferred solutions. Household food insecurity is conceptualized in public policy in the U.S. and Australia as a short-term crisis for people, justifying austere, time-limited and patchwork solutions. A narrative of caregivers’ lived experience of food insecurity suggests that it is inter-generational, and exacerbated by a food system shock (i.e., COVID-19). These findings from two varying cities and nations offer a different conceptualization of the timespan and nature of the phenomenon of food insecurity, challenging a dominant policy narrative and highlighting the inadequacy of current so-called solutions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agriculture and Human Values\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"35 - 51\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10460-024-10646-4.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agriculture and Human Values\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10460-024-10646-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture and Human Values","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10460-024-10646-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管美国和澳大利亚是高收入粮食生产国,但两国的儿童及其照顾者都可能面临粮食不安全问题。营养研究人员组成了一个美国-澳大利亚联合合作项目,帮助有0-5岁幼儿的家庭提高食品安全。本研究从照顾者的角度调查了粮食不安全问题,特别是他们对粮食不安全对他们自己的童年、他们现在的生活以及他们所照顾的儿童的影响的看法。在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,于2020年7月至9月进行了半结构化访谈。参与者是在美国内布拉斯加州的奥马哈(n = 19)和澳大利亚维多利亚州的墨尔本(n = 22)招募的,他们是在居家公共卫生令期间招募的。这两个案例研究站点能够探索一些普遍的,以及一些特定背景的,社会,经济和健康条件,这些条件缓冲或加剧了这些新自由主义政治环境中家庭的粮食不安全。进行了归纳主题分析,确定了六个主题:贫穷的成长、吸取的教训、在大流行病中养活家庭、照顾者应对策略、早期粮食安全以及保护(幼儿)儿童。对当地反饥饿战略的观点进行了整理,以概述与会者的首选解决方案。在美国和澳大利亚的公共政策中,家庭粮食不安全被定义为人们的短期危机,为严格、有时限和拼凑的解决方案辩护。对照顾者粮食不安全的亲身经历的叙述表明,粮食不安全是代际的,并因粮食系统冲击(即COVID-19)而加剧。这些来自两个不同城市和国家的调查结果对粮食不安全现象的时间跨度和性质提出了不同的概念,挑战了占主导地位的政策叙述,并突出了当前所谓解决方案的不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Generations of ‘shock absorbers’: women caregivers of young children and their efforts to mitigate food insecurity during the COVID-19 pandemic

Despite their status as high-income food producing nations, children and their caregivers, both in the United States (U.S.) and Australia can experience food insecurity. Nutrition researchers formed a joint U.S.-Australia collaboration to help advance food security for households with young children aged 0–5 years. This study investigated food insecurity from the perspective of caregivers, especially their perceptions of the impact of food insecurity on their own childhood, their current life, and for the children in their care. Semi-structured interviews were conducted from July to September 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants were recruited in Omaha, Nebraska, U.S. (n = 19) and Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (n = 22), during periods of stay-at-home public health orders. These two case study sites enabled an exploration of some universal, and some context-specific, social, economic, and health conditions that buffer, or exacerbate, food insecurity for families in these neo-liberal political settings. An inductive thematic analysis was conducted and established six themes:growing up poor, lessons learned, feeding a family amidst a pandemic, caregiver coping strategies, food security in the early years and protecting (young) children. Perspectives on local anti-hunger strategies were organized to outline participant’s preferred solutions. Household food insecurity is conceptualized in public policy in the U.S. and Australia as a short-term crisis for people, justifying austere, time-limited and patchwork solutions. A narrative of caregivers’ lived experience of food insecurity suggests that it is inter-generational, and exacerbated by a food system shock (i.e., COVID-19). These findings from two varying cities and nations offer a different conceptualization of the timespan and nature of the phenomenon of food insecurity, challenging a dominant policy narrative and highlighting the inadequacy of current so-called solutions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agriculture and Human Values
Agriculture and Human Values 农林科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
97
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Agriculture and Human Values is the journal of the Agriculture, Food, and Human Values Society. The Journal, like the Society, is dedicated to an open and free discussion of the values that shape and the structures that underlie current and alternative visions of food and agricultural systems. To this end the Journal publishes interdisciplinary research that critically examines the values, relationships, conflicts and contradictions within contemporary agricultural and food systems and that addresses the impact of agricultural and food related institutions, policies, and practices on human populations, the environment, democratic governance, and social equity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信