临床决策支持作为一项实施战略,以扩大识别和阿片类药物使用障碍的治疗管理在急诊科。

0 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Jacob A. Lebin , Stuart Sommers , Zhixin Lun , Colin Hensen , Jason A. Hoppe
{"title":"临床决策支持作为一项实施战略,以扩大识别和阿片类药物使用障碍的治疗管理在急诊科。","authors":"Jacob A. Lebin ,&nbsp;Stuart Sommers ,&nbsp;Zhixin Lun ,&nbsp;Colin Hensen ,&nbsp;Jason A. Hoppe","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2025.209653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>US opioid overdoses and deaths continue to increase, despite historic national investment to mitigate risk and improve access to evidence-based treatment. Unfortunately, implementation of emergency department (ED) buprenorphine – an effective medical treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) – has been limited. Our objective was to assess the effectiveness of an electronic health record (EHR)-integrated, interruptive clinical decision support (CDS) tool to improve rates of ED initiated OUD treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is an observational, pre-post study of a CDS tool designed to identify and facilitate treatment of patients with OUD using electronic health record data. Patients were included if treated at our urban, academic ED between May 1, 2022, and November 8, 2023. The CDS triggered based on a rules-based algorithm using routinely collected EHR data which were identified from a previously validated EHR OUD phenotype. Outcomes are organized under a modified RE-AIM framework, with the primary outcome, Effectiveness, measured by the proportion of OUD patients receiving buprenorphine (administered/prescribed; filled prescriptions). Secondary outcomes include patient Reach, clinician Adoption, and fidelity to Implementation. Chi Square tests and Bayesian structural time-series models evaluate differences in outcomes before and after CDS implementation (CausalImpact package v1.3.0 in R v4.4.0).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 171,221 total ED visits during the study period. Patient characteristics before and after CDS implementation were similar. CDS triggered in 4.7 % (2754/58,173) of encounters after initiation of intervention, reaching 116 unique emergency medicine providers and 2566 ED patients. Clinicians adopted the CDS, accessing the OUD treatment pathway link or ordering a social work consult for substance use, in 27 % (1266/4746) of CDS alerts. When compared to the pre-implementation period, CDS implementation was associated with increased buprenorphine administration in the ED by 31 % (95 % CI: 16–47 %, <em>p</em> = 0.001), buprenorphine prescribing from the ED by 20 % (95 % CI: 5–38 %, <em>p</em> = 0.007), and the buprenorphine fill rate at an affiliated ED pharmacy by 17 % (95 % CI: 1–36 %, <em>p</em> = 0.017).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Implementation of an EHR-integrated, CDS was associated with increased ED buprenorphine administration, prescribing, and prescription fills among ED patients with OUD. Further efforts are needed to assess maintenance strategies that improve adoption, minimize interruptiveness, and optimize workflow congruence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 209653"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical decision support as an implementation strategy to expand identification and administration of treatment of opioid use disorder in the emergency department\",\"authors\":\"Jacob A. Lebin ,&nbsp;Stuart Sommers ,&nbsp;Zhixin Lun ,&nbsp;Colin Hensen ,&nbsp;Jason A. Hoppe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.josat.2025.209653\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>US opioid overdoses and deaths continue to increase, despite historic national investment to mitigate risk and improve access to evidence-based treatment. Unfortunately, implementation of emergency department (ED) buprenorphine – an effective medical treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) – has been limited. Our objective was to assess the effectiveness of an electronic health record (EHR)-integrated, interruptive clinical decision support (CDS) tool to improve rates of ED initiated OUD treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is an observational, pre-post study of a CDS tool designed to identify and facilitate treatment of patients with OUD using electronic health record data. Patients were included if treated at our urban, academic ED between May 1, 2022, and November 8, 2023. The CDS triggered based on a rules-based algorithm using routinely collected EHR data which were identified from a previously validated EHR OUD phenotype. Outcomes are organized under a modified RE-AIM framework, with the primary outcome, Effectiveness, measured by the proportion of OUD patients receiving buprenorphine (administered/prescribed; filled prescriptions). Secondary outcomes include patient Reach, clinician Adoption, and fidelity to Implementation. Chi Square tests and Bayesian structural time-series models evaluate differences in outcomes before and after CDS implementation (CausalImpact package v1.3.0 in R v4.4.0).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 171,221 total ED visits during the study period. Patient characteristics before and after CDS implementation were similar. CDS triggered in 4.7 % (2754/58,173) of encounters after initiation of intervention, reaching 116 unique emergency medicine providers and 2566 ED patients. Clinicians adopted the CDS, accessing the OUD treatment pathway link or ordering a social work consult for substance use, in 27 % (1266/4746) of CDS alerts. When compared to the pre-implementation period, CDS implementation was associated with increased buprenorphine administration in the ED by 31 % (95 % CI: 16–47 %, <em>p</em> = 0.001), buprenorphine prescribing from the ED by 20 % (95 % CI: 5–38 %, <em>p</em> = 0.007), and the buprenorphine fill rate at an affiliated ED pharmacy by 17 % (95 % CI: 1–36 %, <em>p</em> = 0.017).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Implementation of an EHR-integrated, CDS was associated with increased ED buprenorphine administration, prescribing, and prescription fills among ED patients with OUD. Further efforts are needed to assess maintenance strategies that improve adoption, minimize interruptiveness, and optimize workflow congruence.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment\",\"volume\":\"172 \",\"pages\":\"Article 209653\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875925000323\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875925000323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导论:美国阿片类药物过量和死亡人数继续增加,尽管国家为降低风险和改善获得循证治疗的机会进行了历史性投资。不幸的是,急诊室(ED)丁丙诺啡(一种治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的有效药物)的实施受到限制。我们的目的是评估电子健康记录(EHR)集成的中断性临床决策支持(CDS)工具在提高ED引发的OUD治疗率方面的有效性。方法:这是一项观察性的前后研究,旨在利用电子健康记录数据识别和促进OUD患者的治疗。纳入的患者在2022年5月1日至2023年11月8日期间在我们的城市学术急诊科接受治疗。CDS是基于一种基于规则的算法触发的,该算法使用常规收集的EHR数据,这些数据是从先前验证的EHR OUD表型中识别出来的。结果是在修改后的RE-AIM框架下组织的,主要结果是有效性,通过接受丁丙诺啡(给药/处方;了处方)。次要结果包括患者的可及性、临床医生的采纳和对实施的忠实度。卡方检验和贝叶斯结构时间序列模型评估CDS实施前后结果的差异(R v4.4.0中的CausalImpact软件包v1.3.0)。结果:在研究期间共有171,221次急诊就诊。实施CDS前后患者特征相似。干预开始后,有4.7 %(2754/58,173)的遭遇触发了CDS,涉及116名独特的急诊医学提供者和2566名ED患者。在27% %(1266/4746)的CDS警报中,临床医生采用了CDS,访问OUD治疗途径链接或为药物使用安排社会工作咨询。相比是否有时期、cd实现与ED丁丙诺啡政府增加了31 %(95 % CI: 16-47 %,p = 0.001),丁丙诺啡处方的ED 20 %(95 % CI: 5 38 %,p = 0.007),和丁丙诺啡填充率在一个附属ED药房17 %(95 % CI: 1-36 %,p = 0.017)。结论:在ED合并OUD患者中,实施ehr整合的CDS与丁丙诺啡给药、处方和处方填充增加有关。需要进一步的努力来评估维护策略,以提高采用率、最小化中断性和优化工作流一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical decision support as an implementation strategy to expand identification and administration of treatment of opioid use disorder in the emergency department

Introduction

US opioid overdoses and deaths continue to increase, despite historic national investment to mitigate risk and improve access to evidence-based treatment. Unfortunately, implementation of emergency department (ED) buprenorphine – an effective medical treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) – has been limited. Our objective was to assess the effectiveness of an electronic health record (EHR)-integrated, interruptive clinical decision support (CDS) tool to improve rates of ED initiated OUD treatment.

Methods

This is an observational, pre-post study of a CDS tool designed to identify and facilitate treatment of patients with OUD using electronic health record data. Patients were included if treated at our urban, academic ED between May 1, 2022, and November 8, 2023. The CDS triggered based on a rules-based algorithm using routinely collected EHR data which were identified from a previously validated EHR OUD phenotype. Outcomes are organized under a modified RE-AIM framework, with the primary outcome, Effectiveness, measured by the proportion of OUD patients receiving buprenorphine (administered/prescribed; filled prescriptions). Secondary outcomes include patient Reach, clinician Adoption, and fidelity to Implementation. Chi Square tests and Bayesian structural time-series models evaluate differences in outcomes before and after CDS implementation (CausalImpact package v1.3.0 in R v4.4.0).

Results

There were 171,221 total ED visits during the study period. Patient characteristics before and after CDS implementation were similar. CDS triggered in 4.7 % (2754/58,173) of encounters after initiation of intervention, reaching 116 unique emergency medicine providers and 2566 ED patients. Clinicians adopted the CDS, accessing the OUD treatment pathway link or ordering a social work consult for substance use, in 27 % (1266/4746) of CDS alerts. When compared to the pre-implementation period, CDS implementation was associated with increased buprenorphine administration in the ED by 31 % (95 % CI: 16–47 %, p = 0.001), buprenorphine prescribing from the ED by 20 % (95 % CI: 5–38 %, p = 0.007), and the buprenorphine fill rate at an affiliated ED pharmacy by 17 % (95 % CI: 1–36 %, p = 0.017).

Conclusions

Implementation of an EHR-integrated, CDS was associated with increased ED buprenorphine administration, prescribing, and prescription fills among ED patients with OUD. Further efforts are needed to assess maintenance strategies that improve adoption, minimize interruptiveness, and optimize workflow congruence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience (General), Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信