IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Eric Kai-Chung Wong, Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai, Joanna E M Sale, Andrea C Tricco, Sharon E Straus, David M J Naimark
{"title":"Changing Time Representation in Microsimulation Models.","authors":"Eric Kai-Chung Wong, Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai, Joanna E M Sale, Andrea C Tricco, Sharon E Straus, David M J Naimark","doi":"10.1177/0272989X251319808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In microsimulation models of diseases with an early, acute phase requiring short cycle lengths followed by a chronic phase, fixed short cycles may lead to computational inefficiency. Examples include epidemic or resource constraint models with early short cycles where long-term economic consequences are of interest for individuals surviving the epidemic or ultimately obtaining the resource. In this article, we demonstrate methods to improve efficiency in such scenarios. Furthermore, we show that care must be taken when applying these methods to epidemic or resource constraint models to avoid bias.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To demonstrate efficiency, we compared the model runtime among 3 versions of a microsimulation model: with short fixed cycles for all states (FCL), with dynamic cycle length (DCL) defined locally for each state, and with DCL features plus a discrete-event-like hybrid component. To demonstrate bias mitigation, we compared discounted lifetime costs for 3 versions of a resource constraint model: with a fixed horizon where simulation stops, with a fixed entry horizon beyond which new individuals could not enter the model, and with a fixed entry horizon plus a mechanism to maintain a constant level of competition for the resource after the horizon.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 3 versions of the microsimulation model had average runtimes of 515 (95% credible interval [CI]: 477 to 545; FCL), 2.70 (95% CI: 1.48 to 2.92; DCL), and 1.45 (95% CI: 1.26 to 2.61; DCL-pseudo discrete event simulation) seconds, respectively. The first 2 resource constraint versions underestimated costs relative to the constant competition version: $20,055 (95% CI: $19,000 to $21,120), $27,030 (95% CI: $24,680 to $29,412), and $33,424 (95% CI: $27,510 to $44,484), respectively.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The magnitude of improvements in efficiency and reduction in bias may be model specific.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Changing time representation in microsimulation may offer computational advantages.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Short cycle lengths may be required to model the acute phase of an illness but lead to computational inefficiency in a subsequent chronic phase in microsimulation models.A solution is to create state-specific cycle lengths so that cycle lengths change dynamically as the simulation progresses.Computational efficiency can be enhanced further by using a hybrid model containing discrete-event-simulation-like features.Hybrid models can efficiently handle events subsequent to exit from an epidemic or resource constraint model provided steps are taken to mitigate potential bias.</p>","PeriodicalId":49839,"journal":{"name":"Medical Decision Making","volume":" ","pages":"272989X251319808"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X251319808","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在疾病的微观模拟模型中,早期急性期需要较短的周期长度,随后是慢性期,固定的短周期可能会导致计算效率低下。这方面的例子包括具有早期短周期的流行病或资源约束模型,在这些模型中,个人在流行病中存活或最终获得资源的长期经济后果很重要。在本文中,我们展示了在这种情况下提高效率的方法。此外,我们还展示了将这些方法应用于流行病或资源限制模型时必须注意的问题,以避免偏差:为了证明效率,我们比较了微观模拟模型 3 个版本的模型运行时间:所有状态的短固定周期(FCL)、每个状态局部定义的动态周期长度(DCL)以及 DCL 特征加上类似离散事件的混合组件。为了证明偏差的缓解,我们比较了 3 个版本的资源约束模型的贴现寿命成本:模拟停止的固定时间跨度、超过时间跨度新个体无法进入模型的固定进入时间跨度,以及固定进入时间跨度加上在时间跨度后保持资源竞争水平不变的机制:三个版本的微观模拟模型的平均运行时间分别为 515 秒(95% 可信区间[CI]:477 至 545;FCL)、2.70 秒(95% 可信区间[CI]:1.48 至 2.92;DCL)和 1.45 秒(95% 可信区间[CI]:1.26 至 2.61;DCL-伪离散事件模拟)。与恒定竞争版本相比,前两个资源限制版本低估了成本:分别为 20,055 美元(95% CI:19,000 美元至 21,120 美元)、27,030 美元(95% CI:24,680 美元至 29,412 美元)和 33,424 美元(95% CI:27,510 美元至 44,484 美元):局限性:提高效率和减少偏差的幅度可能与模型有关:结论:在微观模拟中改变时间表示可能会带来计算优势:在微观模拟模型中,可能需要较短的周期长度来模拟疾病的急性期,但在随后的慢性期会导致计算效率低下。解决方法是创建特定状态的周期长度,使周期长度随着模拟的进行而动态变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changing Time Representation in Microsimulation Models.

Background: In microsimulation models of diseases with an early, acute phase requiring short cycle lengths followed by a chronic phase, fixed short cycles may lead to computational inefficiency. Examples include epidemic or resource constraint models with early short cycles where long-term economic consequences are of interest for individuals surviving the epidemic or ultimately obtaining the resource. In this article, we demonstrate methods to improve efficiency in such scenarios. Furthermore, we show that care must be taken when applying these methods to epidemic or resource constraint models to avoid bias.

Methods: To demonstrate efficiency, we compared the model runtime among 3 versions of a microsimulation model: with short fixed cycles for all states (FCL), with dynamic cycle length (DCL) defined locally for each state, and with DCL features plus a discrete-event-like hybrid component. To demonstrate bias mitigation, we compared discounted lifetime costs for 3 versions of a resource constraint model: with a fixed horizon where simulation stops, with a fixed entry horizon beyond which new individuals could not enter the model, and with a fixed entry horizon plus a mechanism to maintain a constant level of competition for the resource after the horizon.

Results: The 3 versions of the microsimulation model had average runtimes of 515 (95% credible interval [CI]: 477 to 545; FCL), 2.70 (95% CI: 1.48 to 2.92; DCL), and 1.45 (95% CI: 1.26 to 2.61; DCL-pseudo discrete event simulation) seconds, respectively. The first 2 resource constraint versions underestimated costs relative to the constant competition version: $20,055 (95% CI: $19,000 to $21,120), $27,030 (95% CI: $24,680 to $29,412), and $33,424 (95% CI: $27,510 to $44,484), respectively.

Limitations: The magnitude of improvements in efficiency and reduction in bias may be model specific.

Conclusion: Changing time representation in microsimulation may offer computational advantages.

Highlights: Short cycle lengths may be required to model the acute phase of an illness but lead to computational inefficiency in a subsequent chronic phase in microsimulation models.A solution is to create state-specific cycle lengths so that cycle lengths change dynamically as the simulation progresses.Computational efficiency can be enhanced further by using a hybrid model containing discrete-event-simulation-like features.Hybrid models can efficiently handle events subsequent to exit from an epidemic or resource constraint model provided steps are taken to mitigate potential bias.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Decision Making
Medical Decision Making 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
146
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Decision Making offers rigorous and systematic approaches to decision making that are designed to improve the health and clinical care of individuals and to assist with health care policy development. Using the fundamentals of decision analysis and theory, economic evaluation, and evidence based quality assessment, Medical Decision Making presents both theoretical and practical statistical and modeling techniques and methods from a variety of disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信