抑郁症智能手机认知行为治疗的技能回顾模式:干预内容使用的观察性研究。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Jmir Mental Health Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI:10.2196/63497
Emily E Bernstein, Katharine E Daniel, Peyton E Miyares, Susanne S Hoeppner, Kate H Bentley, Ivar Snorrason, Lauren B Fisher, Jennifer L Greenberg, Hilary Weingarden, Oliver Harrison, Sabine Wilhelm
{"title":"抑郁症智能手机认知行为治疗的技能回顾模式:干预内容使用的观察性研究。","authors":"Emily E Bernstein, Katharine E Daniel, Peyton E Miyares, Susanne S Hoeppner, Kate H Bentley, Ivar Snorrason, Lauren B Fisher, Jennifer L Greenberg, Hilary Weingarden, Oliver Harrison, Sabine Wilhelm","doi":"10.2196/63497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Smartphones could enhance access to effective cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Users may frequently and flexibly access bite-size CBT content on personal devices, review and practice skills, and thereby achieve better outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We explored the distribution of actual interactions participants had with therapeutic content in a trial of smartphone CBT for depression and whether interactions were within assigned treatment modules or revisits to prior module content (ie, between-module interactions).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined the association between the number of within- and between-module interactions and baseline and end-of-treatment symptom severity during an 8-week, single-arm open trial of a therapist-guided CBT for depression mobile health app.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interactions were more frequent early in treatment and modestly declined in later stages. Within modules, most participants consistently made more interactions than required to progress to the next module and tended to return to all types of content rather than focus on 1 skill. By contrast, only 15 of 26 participants ever revisited prior module content (median number of revisits=1, mode=0, IQR 0-4). More revisits were associated with more severe end-of-treatment symptom severity after controlling for pretreatment symptom severity (P<.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggest that the frequency of use is an insufficient metric of engagement, lacking the nuance of what users are engaging with and when during treatment. This lens is essential for developing personalized recommendations and yielding better treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05386329; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05386329?term=NCT05386329.</p>","PeriodicalId":48616,"journal":{"name":"Jmir Mental Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"e63497"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11894344/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patterns of Skills Review in Smartphone Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression: Observational Study of Intervention Content Use.\",\"authors\":\"Emily E Bernstein, Katharine E Daniel, Peyton E Miyares, Susanne S Hoeppner, Kate H Bentley, Ivar Snorrason, Lauren B Fisher, Jennifer L Greenberg, Hilary Weingarden, Oliver Harrison, Sabine Wilhelm\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/63497\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Smartphones could enhance access to effective cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Users may frequently and flexibly access bite-size CBT content on personal devices, review and practice skills, and thereby achieve better outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We explored the distribution of actual interactions participants had with therapeutic content in a trial of smartphone CBT for depression and whether interactions were within assigned treatment modules or revisits to prior module content (ie, between-module interactions).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined the association between the number of within- and between-module interactions and baseline and end-of-treatment symptom severity during an 8-week, single-arm open trial of a therapist-guided CBT for depression mobile health app.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interactions were more frequent early in treatment and modestly declined in later stages. Within modules, most participants consistently made more interactions than required to progress to the next module and tended to return to all types of content rather than focus on 1 skill. By contrast, only 15 of 26 participants ever revisited prior module content (median number of revisits=1, mode=0, IQR 0-4). More revisits were associated with more severe end-of-treatment symptom severity after controlling for pretreatment symptom severity (P<.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggest that the frequency of use is an insufficient metric of engagement, lacking the nuance of what users are engaging with and when during treatment. This lens is essential for developing personalized recommendations and yielding better treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05386329; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05386329?term=NCT05386329.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jmir Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"e63497\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11894344/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jmir Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/63497\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jmir Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/63497","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:智能手机可以增加有效认知行为疗法(CBT)的使用。用户可以在个人设备上频繁、灵活地访问一口大小的CBT内容,复习和练习技能,从而达到更好的效果。目的:在一项针对抑郁症的智能手机CBT试验中,我们探讨了参与者与治疗内容的实际互动分布,以及这些互动是在指定的治疗模块内还是对先前模块内容的重新审视(即模块之间的互动)。方法:在一项为期8周的、由治疗师指导的抑郁症移动健康应用程序CBT的单臂开放试验中,我们研究了模块内部和模块之间相互作用的数量与基线和治疗结束时症状严重程度之间的关系。结果:相互作用在治疗早期更频繁,在后期轻微下降。在模块中,大多数参与者的互动次数超过了进入下一个模块所需的次数,并且倾向于返回所有类型的内容,而不是专注于一项技能。相比之下,26名参与者中只有15人曾经重访过先前的模块内容(重访次数中位数=1,模式=0,IQR 0-4)。在控制治疗前症状严重程度后,更多的回访与更严重的治疗结束症状严重程度相关(结论:结果表明,使用频率是一个不充分的参与指标,缺乏用户在治疗期间参与的内容和时间的细微差别。这种视角对于制定个性化建议和产生更好的治疗结果至关重要。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05386329;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05386329?term=NCT05386329。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patterns of Skills Review in Smartphone Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression: Observational Study of Intervention Content Use.

Background: Smartphones could enhance access to effective cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Users may frequently and flexibly access bite-size CBT content on personal devices, review and practice skills, and thereby achieve better outcomes.

Objective: We explored the distribution of actual interactions participants had with therapeutic content in a trial of smartphone CBT for depression and whether interactions were within assigned treatment modules or revisits to prior module content (ie, between-module interactions).

Methods: We examined the association between the number of within- and between-module interactions and baseline and end-of-treatment symptom severity during an 8-week, single-arm open trial of a therapist-guided CBT for depression mobile health app.

Results: Interactions were more frequent early in treatment and modestly declined in later stages. Within modules, most participants consistently made more interactions than required to progress to the next module and tended to return to all types of content rather than focus on 1 skill. By contrast, only 15 of 26 participants ever revisited prior module content (median number of revisits=1, mode=0, IQR 0-4). More revisits were associated with more severe end-of-treatment symptom severity after controlling for pretreatment symptom severity (P<.05).

Conclusions: The results suggest that the frequency of use is an insufficient metric of engagement, lacking the nuance of what users are engaging with and when during treatment. This lens is essential for developing personalized recommendations and yielding better treatment outcomes.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05386329; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05386329?term=NCT05386329.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Jmir Mental Health
Jmir Mental Health Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
104
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JMIR Mental Health (JMH, ISSN 2368-7959) is a PubMed-indexed, peer-reviewed sister journal of JMIR, the leading eHealth journal (Impact Factor 2016: 5.175). JMIR Mental Health focusses on digital health and Internet interventions, technologies and electronic innovations (software and hardware) for mental health, addictions, online counselling and behaviour change. This includes formative evaluation and system descriptions, theoretical papers, review papers, viewpoint/vision papers, and rigorous evaluations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信