左心房应变值与组织多普勒超声心动图及左心房容积指数评价慢性肾病患者左室舒张功能的关系

IF 1.7 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Eman Elsheikh, Zainab Amjad, Samah I Abohamr, Muthana Al Sahlawi, Ibtsam Khairat
{"title":"左心房应变值与组织多普勒超声心动图及左心房容积指数评价慢性肾病患者左室舒张功能的关系","authors":"Eman Elsheikh, Zainab Amjad, Samah I Abohamr, Muthana Al Sahlawi, Ibtsam Khairat","doi":"10.3390/clinpract15020036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> In heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and decreased ejection fraction (HFrEF), LA strain, an indicator of the filling and discharge of the left atrium (LA), was recently identified as a sign of diastolic dysfunction. Our objective was to examine the significance of left atrial (LA) strain relative to tissue Doppler echocardiography and the left atrial volume index (LAVI) in evaluating left ventricular (LV) diastolic performance in individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD). <b>Methods</b>: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 220 outpatients with CKD who fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were referred to the cardiology clinic at Tanta University for routine echocardiographic assessment during a period of 6 months (April to September 2024). Based on their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), patients were divided into five groups: GFR ranges from 90 to 120 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> in Group 1, 60 to 90 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> in Group 2, 30 to 60 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> in Group 3, 15 to 29 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> in Group 4, and less than 15 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> in Group 5. All participants were evaluated using echocardiographic measurements, such as the E/e ratio, left ventricular systolic and diastolic volumes, left atrial strain, left atrial volume index (LAVI), and ejection fraction (EF). <b>Results</b>: LA strain conduit and reservoir strain can significantly diagnose LV diastolic function in CKD patients (<i>p</i> < 0.001; AUC = 0.819 and 0.869, respectively) using cutoffs of ≤36 and ≥23, with 86% and 95.5% sensitivity, 65% and 60% specificity, 96.1% and 96% PPV, and 31.7% and 57.1%, NPV respectively. An AUC = 0.926 was observed with LAVI among grade 1 vs. grade 0 (0.9 is considered excellent in diagnosing patients with and without the disease). Other markers had AUC values of 0.5-0.6 among the grades of the diastolic function, suggesting no discrimination in diagnosing the disease. <b>Conclusions:</b> LA conduit strain and reservoir strain are independent markers that represent a superior and more sensitive approach than LAVI and tissue Doppler echocardiography for evaluating LV diastolic dysfunction in patients with CKD, even in the early stages.</p>","PeriodicalId":45306,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and Practice","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11854719/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Left Atrial Strain Value Versus Tissue Doppler Echocardiography and the Left Atrium Volume Index in the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Eman Elsheikh, Zainab Amjad, Samah I Abohamr, Muthana Al Sahlawi, Ibtsam Khairat\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/clinpract15020036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> In heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and decreased ejection fraction (HFrEF), LA strain, an indicator of the filling and discharge of the left atrium (LA), was recently identified as a sign of diastolic dysfunction. Our objective was to examine the significance of left atrial (LA) strain relative to tissue Doppler echocardiography and the left atrial volume index (LAVI) in evaluating left ventricular (LV) diastolic performance in individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD). <b>Methods</b>: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 220 outpatients with CKD who fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were referred to the cardiology clinic at Tanta University for routine echocardiographic assessment during a period of 6 months (April to September 2024). Based on their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), patients were divided into five groups: GFR ranges from 90 to 120 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> in Group 1, 60 to 90 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> in Group 2, 30 to 60 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> in Group 3, 15 to 29 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> in Group 4, and less than 15 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> in Group 5. All participants were evaluated using echocardiographic measurements, such as the E/e ratio, left ventricular systolic and diastolic volumes, left atrial strain, left atrial volume index (LAVI), and ejection fraction (EF). <b>Results</b>: LA strain conduit and reservoir strain can significantly diagnose LV diastolic function in CKD patients (<i>p</i> < 0.001; AUC = 0.819 and 0.869, respectively) using cutoffs of ≤36 and ≥23, with 86% and 95.5% sensitivity, 65% and 60% specificity, 96.1% and 96% PPV, and 31.7% and 57.1%, NPV respectively. An AUC = 0.926 was observed with LAVI among grade 1 vs. grade 0 (0.9 is considered excellent in diagnosing patients with and without the disease). Other markers had AUC values of 0.5-0.6 among the grades of the diastolic function, suggesting no discrimination in diagnosing the disease. <b>Conclusions:</b> LA conduit strain and reservoir strain are independent markers that represent a superior and more sensitive approach than LAVI and tissue Doppler echocardiography for evaluating LV diastolic dysfunction in patients with CKD, even in the early stages.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinics and Practice\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11854719/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinics and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract15020036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract15020036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在射血分数保留(HFpEF)和射血分数降低(HFrEF)的心力衰竭中,左心房充盈和放电的指标LA应变最近被确定为舒张功能障碍的标志。我们的目的是研究左房(LA)应变相对于组织多普勒超声心动图和左房容积指数(LAVI)在评估慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)患者左室(LV)舒张表现中的意义。方法:前瞻性横断面研究220例符合纳入标准的慢性肾病门诊患者,于2024年4月至9月在坦塔大学心内科门诊进行常规超声心动图评估,为期6个月。根据估计的肾小球滤过率(eGFR),将患者分为五组:GFR范围为90 ~ 120ml /min/1.73 m2的组为1组,60 ~ 90ml /min/1.73 m2的组为2组,30 ~ 60ml /min/1.73 m2的组为3组,15 ~ 29ml /min/1.73 m2的组为4组,小于15ml /min/1.73 m2的组为5组。所有参与者都使用超声心动图测量进行评估,如E/ E比、左室收缩和舒张容积、左房应变、左房容积指数(LAVI)和射血分数(EF)。结果:LA应变导管和储层应变可显著诊断CKD患者左室舒张功能(p < 0.001;AUC分别为0.819和0.869),截止值分别为≤36和≥23,敏感性分别为86%和95.5%,特异性分别为65%和60%,PPV分别为96.1%和96%,NPV分别为31.7%和57.1%。1级与0级LAVI患者的AUC = 0.926(在诊断患者是否患有该疾病时,0.9被认为是优秀的)。其他指标在舒张功能分级中的AUC值为0.5-0.6,提示对本病的诊断无区别。结论:相比于LAVI和组织多普勒超声心动图,LA导管应变和储层应变是一种更优越、更敏感的评估CKD患者左室舒张功能障碍的独立标志物,即使在早期也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Left Atrial Strain Value Versus Tissue Doppler Echocardiography and the Left Atrium Volume Index in the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.

Background: In heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and decreased ejection fraction (HFrEF), LA strain, an indicator of the filling and discharge of the left atrium (LA), was recently identified as a sign of diastolic dysfunction. Our objective was to examine the significance of left atrial (LA) strain relative to tissue Doppler echocardiography and the left atrial volume index (LAVI) in evaluating left ventricular (LV) diastolic performance in individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 220 outpatients with CKD who fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were referred to the cardiology clinic at Tanta University for routine echocardiographic assessment during a period of 6 months (April to September 2024). Based on their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), patients were divided into five groups: GFR ranges from 90 to 120 mL/min/1.73 m2 in Group 1, 60 to 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 in Group 2, 30 to 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 in Group 3, 15 to 29 mL/min/1.73 m2 in Group 4, and less than 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 in Group 5. All participants were evaluated using echocardiographic measurements, such as the E/e ratio, left ventricular systolic and diastolic volumes, left atrial strain, left atrial volume index (LAVI), and ejection fraction (EF). Results: LA strain conduit and reservoir strain can significantly diagnose LV diastolic function in CKD patients (p < 0.001; AUC = 0.819 and 0.869, respectively) using cutoffs of ≤36 and ≥23, with 86% and 95.5% sensitivity, 65% and 60% specificity, 96.1% and 96% PPV, and 31.7% and 57.1%, NPV respectively. An AUC = 0.926 was observed with LAVI among grade 1 vs. grade 0 (0.9 is considered excellent in diagnosing patients with and without the disease). Other markers had AUC values of 0.5-0.6 among the grades of the diastolic function, suggesting no discrimination in diagnosing the disease. Conclusions: LA conduit strain and reservoir strain are independent markers that represent a superior and more sensitive approach than LAVI and tissue Doppler echocardiography for evaluating LV diastolic dysfunction in patients with CKD, even in the early stages.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinics and Practice
Clinics and Practice MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信