Fitbit和App对不同癌症幸存者干预的可用性和实施考虑:混合方法研究。

IF 3.3 Q2 ONCOLOGY
JMIR Cancer Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI:10.2196/60034
Zakery Dabbagh, Reem Najjar, Ariana Kamberi, Ben S Gerber, Aditi Singh, Apurv Soni, Sarah L Cutrona, David D McManus, Jamie M Faro
{"title":"Fitbit和App对不同癌症幸存者干预的可用性和实施考虑:混合方法研究。","authors":"Zakery Dabbagh, Reem Najjar, Ariana Kamberi, Ben S Gerber, Aditi Singh, Apurv Soni, Sarah L Cutrona, David D McManus, Jamie M Faro","doi":"10.2196/60034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the known benefits of physical activity, cancer survivors remain insufficiently active. Prior trials have adopted digital health methods, although several have been pedometer-based and enrolled mainly female, non-Hispanic White, and more highly educated survivors of breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to test a previously developed mobile health system consisting of a Fitbit activity tracker and the MyDataHelps smartphone app for feasibility in a diverse group of cancer survivors, with the goal of refining the program and setting the stage for a larger future trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were identified from one academic medical center's electronic health records, referred by a clinician, or self-referred to participate in the study. Participants were screened for eligibility, enrolled, provided a Fitbit activity tracker, and instructed to download the Fitbit: Health & Wellness and MyDataHelps apps. They completed usability surveys at 1 and 3 months. Interviews were conducted at the end of the 3-month intervention with participants and cancer care clinicians to assess the acceptability of the intervention and the implementation of the intervention into clinical practice, respectively. Descriptive statistics were calculated for demographics, usability surveys, and Fitbit adherence and step counts. Rapid qualitative analysis was used to identify key findings from interview transcriptions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 100 patients screened for eligibility, 31 were enrolled in the trial (mean age 64.8, SD 11.1 years; female patients=17/31, 55%; Hispanic or Latino=7/31, 23%; non-White=11/31, 35%; less than a bachelor's degree=14/31, 45%; and household income <US $75,000=11/31, 35%). The mean (SD) years since diagnosis was 7.1 (8.2), and the two most frequent cancer diagnoses were prostate (9/31, 29%) and breast (4/31, 13%) cancer. Participants provided positive feedback on the MyDataHelps app usability; the overall app quality received a mean score of 3.79 (SD 0.82) on a 5-point Likert scale (1=worst, 5=best). Interviews with 10 patients yielded four themes: (1) Fitbit and app setup was easy but the research team provided assistance, when needed, which was helpful, (2) motivational messages within the app were not memorable, (3) step counts and Fitbit notifications were motivating, and (4) medical professionals viewing their data were acceptable. Interviews with 5 cancer care clinicians yielded four themes: (1) some patients used wearables but rarely discussed data with clinicians; (2) activity trackers can be helpful to motivate patients and keep them accountable; (3) objective activity measures-similar to BMI, weight, and blood pressure- that they can track over time and refer to afterward were preferred; and (4) training and systematic processes to view these data as part of active workflow were desired.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing a remotely delivered, light-intensity physical activity program was feasible and acceptable in a sample of diverse cancer survivors. Future studies should consider registry-based methods and work with clinicians to engage hard-to-reach survivor populations who have low physical activity levels and disproportionately high adverse health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":45538,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Cancer","volume":"11 ","pages":"e60034"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11875131/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usability and Implementation Considerations of Fitbit and App Intervention for Diverse Cancer Survivors: Mixed Methods Study.\",\"authors\":\"Zakery Dabbagh, Reem Najjar, Ariana Kamberi, Ben S Gerber, Aditi Singh, Apurv Soni, Sarah L Cutrona, David D McManus, Jamie M Faro\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/60034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the known benefits of physical activity, cancer survivors remain insufficiently active. Prior trials have adopted digital health methods, although several have been pedometer-based and enrolled mainly female, non-Hispanic White, and more highly educated survivors of breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to test a previously developed mobile health system consisting of a Fitbit activity tracker and the MyDataHelps smartphone app for feasibility in a diverse group of cancer survivors, with the goal of refining the program and setting the stage for a larger future trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were identified from one academic medical center's electronic health records, referred by a clinician, or self-referred to participate in the study. Participants were screened for eligibility, enrolled, provided a Fitbit activity tracker, and instructed to download the Fitbit: Health & Wellness and MyDataHelps apps. They completed usability surveys at 1 and 3 months. Interviews were conducted at the end of the 3-month intervention with participants and cancer care clinicians to assess the acceptability of the intervention and the implementation of the intervention into clinical practice, respectively. Descriptive statistics were calculated for demographics, usability surveys, and Fitbit adherence and step counts. Rapid qualitative analysis was used to identify key findings from interview transcriptions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 100 patients screened for eligibility, 31 were enrolled in the trial (mean age 64.8, SD 11.1 years; female patients=17/31, 55%; Hispanic or Latino=7/31, 23%; non-White=11/31, 35%; less than a bachelor's degree=14/31, 45%; and household income <US $75,000=11/31, 35%). The mean (SD) years since diagnosis was 7.1 (8.2), and the two most frequent cancer diagnoses were prostate (9/31, 29%) and breast (4/31, 13%) cancer. Participants provided positive feedback on the MyDataHelps app usability; the overall app quality received a mean score of 3.79 (SD 0.82) on a 5-point Likert scale (1=worst, 5=best). Interviews with 10 patients yielded four themes: (1) Fitbit and app setup was easy but the research team provided assistance, when needed, which was helpful, (2) motivational messages within the app were not memorable, (3) step counts and Fitbit notifications were motivating, and (4) medical professionals viewing their data were acceptable. Interviews with 5 cancer care clinicians yielded four themes: (1) some patients used wearables but rarely discussed data with clinicians; (2) activity trackers can be helpful to motivate patients and keep them accountable; (3) objective activity measures-similar to BMI, weight, and blood pressure- that they can track over time and refer to afterward were preferred; and (4) training and systematic processes to view these data as part of active workflow were desired.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing a remotely delivered, light-intensity physical activity program was feasible and acceptable in a sample of diverse cancer survivors. Future studies should consider registry-based methods and work with clinicians to engage hard-to-reach survivor populations who have low physical activity levels and disproportionately high adverse health outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Cancer\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"e60034\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11875131/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/60034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/60034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管已知体育锻炼的好处,癌症幸存者仍然缺乏足够的运动。之前的试验采用了数字健康方法,尽管有几项试验是以计步器为基础的,主要招募了女性、非西班牙裔白人和受过高等教育的乳腺癌幸存者。目的:本研究的目的是测试先前开发的移动医疗系统,该系统由Fitbit活动跟踪器和mydata帮助智能手机应用程序组成,在不同的癌症幸存者群体中进行可行性测试,目的是完善该计划,并为未来更大规模的试验奠定基础。方法:参与者从一个学术医疗中心的电子健康记录中确定,由临床医生推荐,或自我推荐参加研究。参与者经过资格筛选、注册、提供Fitbit活动追踪器,并被指示下载Fitbit: Health & Wellness和mydatahelp应用程序。他们在1个月和3个月时完成了可用性调查。在为期3个月的干预结束时,对参与者和癌症护理临床医生进行访谈,分别评估干预的可接受性和干预在临床实践中的实施情况。统计数据包括人口统计、可用性调查、Fitbit依从性和步数。快速定性分析用于从采访记录中确定关键发现。结果:在筛选合格的100例患者中,31例入组试验(平均年龄64.8岁,SD 11.1岁;女性患者17/31,占55%;西班牙裔或拉丁裔=7/ 31,23%;非白人= 11/31,35%;本科以下学历=14/ 31,45 %;结论:在不同的癌症幸存者样本中,实施远程交付的低强度体育活动计划是可行和可接受的。未来的研究应考虑以登记为基础的方法,并与临床医生合作,吸引难以接触到的幸存者人群,他们的身体活动水平低,不良健康结果高得不成比例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Usability and Implementation Considerations of Fitbit and App Intervention for Diverse Cancer Survivors: Mixed Methods Study.

Background: Despite the known benefits of physical activity, cancer survivors remain insufficiently active. Prior trials have adopted digital health methods, although several have been pedometer-based and enrolled mainly female, non-Hispanic White, and more highly educated survivors of breast cancer.

Objective: The objective of this study was to test a previously developed mobile health system consisting of a Fitbit activity tracker and the MyDataHelps smartphone app for feasibility in a diverse group of cancer survivors, with the goal of refining the program and setting the stage for a larger future trial.

Methods: Participants were identified from one academic medical center's electronic health records, referred by a clinician, or self-referred to participate in the study. Participants were screened for eligibility, enrolled, provided a Fitbit activity tracker, and instructed to download the Fitbit: Health & Wellness and MyDataHelps apps. They completed usability surveys at 1 and 3 months. Interviews were conducted at the end of the 3-month intervention with participants and cancer care clinicians to assess the acceptability of the intervention and the implementation of the intervention into clinical practice, respectively. Descriptive statistics were calculated for demographics, usability surveys, and Fitbit adherence and step counts. Rapid qualitative analysis was used to identify key findings from interview transcriptions.

Results: Of the 100 patients screened for eligibility, 31 were enrolled in the trial (mean age 64.8, SD 11.1 years; female patients=17/31, 55%; Hispanic or Latino=7/31, 23%; non-White=11/31, 35%; less than a bachelor's degree=14/31, 45%; and household income

Conclusions: Implementing a remotely delivered, light-intensity physical activity program was feasible and acceptable in a sample of diverse cancer survivors. Future studies should consider registry-based methods and work with clinicians to engage hard-to-reach survivor populations who have low physical activity levels and disproportionately high adverse health outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Cancer
JMIR Cancer ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信