与骨膜下切除术相比,复合骨切除术对有皮质接触的软组织肉瘤的局部控制和生存率是否更好?:一项比较回顾性队列研究。

IF 2.8 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Hao Qu, Keyi Wang, Cangyi Shi, Hengyuan Li, Xiumao Li, Peng Lin, Nong Lin, Zhaoming Ye
{"title":"与骨膜下切除术相比,复合骨切除术对有皮质接触的软组织肉瘤的局部控制和生存率是否更好?:一项比较回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Hao Qu, Keyi Wang, Cangyi Shi, Hengyuan Li, Xiumao Li, Peng Lin, Nong Lin, Zhaoming Ye","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.62.BJO-2024-0057.R2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Osseous invasion exhibited in soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) is recognized as a prognostic risk factor. Achieving a wide margin is the default surgical approach for local control. However, for STSs where the tumour is in contact with the adjacent cortex but without clear evidence of osseous invasion, such as medullary invasion, the question of whether bone resection can provide better local control or survival than more conservative sub-periosteal excision remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess whether bone resection for thigh STS with cortical contact of the adjacent bone results in better local control and survival compared to sub-periosteal dissection, and to investigate the prognostic factors for clinical outcomes in STS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 142 patients with thigh STS exhibiting cortical contact but without medullary invasion, from May 2000 to May 2020. Patients underwent either composite bone resection or sub-periosteal excision. Demographics, clinical outcomes, and functional outcomes were compared between the two groups. Additionally, Cox regression analysis was used to analyze risk factors for local recurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The five-year overall survival, local recurrence-free survival, and metastasis-free survival among patients with bone resection was 74.0%, 65.9%, and 74.1%, respectively, compared to 72.9%, 68.3%, and 72.0%, respectively, among patients with sub-periosteal excision. The cumulative incidence of recurrence was 33.1% for patients who underwent bone and 36.4% for those with sub-periosteal excision (p = 0.681). In multivariate analysis, STS with high Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre Le Cancer (FNCLCC) grade, invasion involving posterior intermuscular septum, medial intermuscular septum, and adductor brevis were found to be associated with poorer prognosis. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score in the bone resection group was 24.7, significantly lower than the 28.3 in the sub-periosteal group (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Routine bone resection failed to improve local control or survival in STS patients with cortical bone contact, but resulted in significantly impaired postoperative function. A more conservative sub-periosteal excision approach may be preferable for these cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"6 2","pages":"215-226"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11866206/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does composite bone resection for soft-tissue sarcoma with cortical contact result in better local control and survival compared to sub-periosteal dissection? : a comparative retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Hao Qu, Keyi Wang, Cangyi Shi, Hengyuan Li, Xiumao Li, Peng Lin, Nong Lin, Zhaoming Ye\",\"doi\":\"10.1302/2633-1462.62.BJO-2024-0057.R2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Osseous invasion exhibited in soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) is recognized as a prognostic risk factor. Achieving a wide margin is the default surgical approach for local control. However, for STSs where the tumour is in contact with the adjacent cortex but without clear evidence of osseous invasion, such as medullary invasion, the question of whether bone resection can provide better local control or survival than more conservative sub-periosteal excision remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess whether bone resection for thigh STS with cortical contact of the adjacent bone results in better local control and survival compared to sub-periosteal dissection, and to investigate the prognostic factors for clinical outcomes in STS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 142 patients with thigh STS exhibiting cortical contact but without medullary invasion, from May 2000 to May 2020. Patients underwent either composite bone resection or sub-periosteal excision. Demographics, clinical outcomes, and functional outcomes were compared between the two groups. Additionally, Cox regression analysis was used to analyze risk factors for local recurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The five-year overall survival, local recurrence-free survival, and metastasis-free survival among patients with bone resection was 74.0%, 65.9%, and 74.1%, respectively, compared to 72.9%, 68.3%, and 72.0%, respectively, among patients with sub-periosteal excision. The cumulative incidence of recurrence was 33.1% for patients who underwent bone and 36.4% for those with sub-periosteal excision (p = 0.681). In multivariate analysis, STS with high Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre Le Cancer (FNCLCC) grade, invasion involving posterior intermuscular septum, medial intermuscular septum, and adductor brevis were found to be associated with poorer prognosis. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score in the bone resection group was 24.7, significantly lower than the 28.3 in the sub-periosteal group (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Routine bone resection failed to improve local control or survival in STS patients with cortical bone contact, but resulted in significantly impaired postoperative function. A more conservative sub-periosteal excision approach may be preferable for these cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"215-226\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11866206/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.62.BJO-2024-0057.R2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.62.BJO-2024-0057.R2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:软组织肉瘤(STS)表现出的骨侵犯是公认的预后危险因素。获得大切缘是局部控制的默认手术方法。然而,对于肿瘤与邻近皮质接触但没有明确骨侵犯证据(如髓质侵犯)的STSs,骨切除术是否比保守的骨膜下切除术能提供更好的局部控制或生存的问题仍然存在争议。本研究的目的是评估与骨膜下剥离相比,股骨STS皮质接触骨切除术是否能更好地局部控制和生存,并探讨影响STS临床结果的预后因素。方法:对2000年5月至2020年5月期间142例表现为皮质接触但未侵犯髓质的大腿STS患者进行回顾性队列研究。患者接受复合骨切除术或骨膜下切除术。比较两组患者的人口统计学、临床结局和功能结局。采用Cox回归分析局部复发的危险因素。结果:骨切除术患者的5年总生存率、局部无复发生存率和无转移生存率分别为74.0%、65.9%和74.1%,而骨膜下切除术患者的5年总生存率、局部无复发生存率和无转移生存率分别为72.9%、68.3%和72.0%。骨膜下切除术患者的累积复发率为36.4%,骨切除术患者的累积复发率为33.1% (p = 0.681)。在多因素分析中,伴有高FNCLCC分级、侵犯后肌间隔、内侧肌间隔和短内收肌的STS与较差的预后相关。骨切除组MSTS平均评分为24.7分,明显低于骨膜下组28.3分(p < 0.001)。结论:常规骨切除术不能改善皮质骨接触STS患者的局部控制或生存率,但术后功能明显受损。对于这些病例,更保守的骨膜下切除方法可能更可取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does composite bone resection for soft-tissue sarcoma with cortical contact result in better local control and survival compared to sub-periosteal dissection? : a comparative retrospective cohort study.

Aims: Osseous invasion exhibited in soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) is recognized as a prognostic risk factor. Achieving a wide margin is the default surgical approach for local control. However, for STSs where the tumour is in contact with the adjacent cortex but without clear evidence of osseous invasion, such as medullary invasion, the question of whether bone resection can provide better local control or survival than more conservative sub-periosteal excision remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess whether bone resection for thigh STS with cortical contact of the adjacent bone results in better local control and survival compared to sub-periosteal dissection, and to investigate the prognostic factors for clinical outcomes in STS.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 142 patients with thigh STS exhibiting cortical contact but without medullary invasion, from May 2000 to May 2020. Patients underwent either composite bone resection or sub-periosteal excision. Demographics, clinical outcomes, and functional outcomes were compared between the two groups. Additionally, Cox regression analysis was used to analyze risk factors for local recurrence.

Results: The five-year overall survival, local recurrence-free survival, and metastasis-free survival among patients with bone resection was 74.0%, 65.9%, and 74.1%, respectively, compared to 72.9%, 68.3%, and 72.0%, respectively, among patients with sub-periosteal excision. The cumulative incidence of recurrence was 33.1% for patients who underwent bone and 36.4% for those with sub-periosteal excision (p = 0.681). In multivariate analysis, STS with high Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre Le Cancer (FNCLCC) grade, invasion involving posterior intermuscular septum, medial intermuscular septum, and adductor brevis were found to be associated with poorer prognosis. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score in the bone resection group was 24.7, significantly lower than the 28.3 in the sub-periosteal group (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Routine bone resection failed to improve local control or survival in STS patients with cortical bone contact, but resulted in significantly impaired postoperative function. A more conservative sub-periosteal excision approach may be preferable for these cases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Open
Bone & Joint Open ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信