急诊胆囊切除术后的结果预测:ACS-NSQIP 手术风险计算器和 5 项改良虚弱指数的性能评估。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Updates in Surgery Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1007/s13304-025-02128-x
Andrea Spota, Stefano Granieri, Amir Hassanpour, Eran Shlomovitz, Eisar Al-Sukhni
{"title":"急诊胆囊切除术后的结果预测:ACS-NSQIP 手术风险计算器和 5 项改良虚弱指数的性能评估。","authors":"Andrea Spota, Stefano Granieri, Amir Hassanpour, Eran Shlomovitz, Eisar Al-Sukhni","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02128-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pre-operative risk assessment tools and frailty scores are increasingly common due to the growing number of elderly, comorbid and frail patients. This study aims to assess the performance of the ACS-NSQIP-SRC (American College of Surgeons- National Surgical Quality Improvement Program- Surgical Risk Calculator) and the 5mFI (5-items modified Frailty Index) in predicting clinical outcomes after emergency cholecystectomy. This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with acute calculous cholecystitis admitted at our tertiary care center from 2018 to 2023. We evaluated discrimination, calibration, and accuracy of the ACS-NSQIP-SRC and 5mFI in predicting any complication, mortality, length of hospital stay (LOS), need for readmission and supported discharge (30-day follow-up). Among 365/642 patients who underwent surgery, the 5mFI showed poor discrimination for all outcomes but good overall accuracy in the prediction of a supported discharge. In 198 operated patients with available data for the ACS-NSQIP-SRC, it underestimated complications and need for readmission while overestimated the need for supported discharge. There was no concordance between predicted and observed LOS. Among 277/642 patients undergoing non-operative management, 2/3 were frail or mild frail and had a predicted rate of any unfavorable outcome after surgery between 0 and 20%, being 95% above the average risk of each outcome. Mortality couldn't be studied because no death was reported. ACS-NSQIP-SRC and 5mFI performance in predicting outcomes after emergency cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis was poor. In the emergency cholecystectomy setting, the ACS-NSQIP-SRC may be less informative, and the 5mFI may be excessively simplistic by neglecting the multidimensional nature of frailty.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"481-491"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome prediction after emergency cholecystectomy: performance evaluation of the ACS-NSQIP surgical risk calculator and the 5-item modified frailty index.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Spota, Stefano Granieri, Amir Hassanpour, Eran Shlomovitz, Eisar Al-Sukhni\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13304-025-02128-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pre-operative risk assessment tools and frailty scores are increasingly common due to the growing number of elderly, comorbid and frail patients. This study aims to assess the performance of the ACS-NSQIP-SRC (American College of Surgeons- National Surgical Quality Improvement Program- Surgical Risk Calculator) and the 5mFI (5-items modified Frailty Index) in predicting clinical outcomes after emergency cholecystectomy. This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with acute calculous cholecystitis admitted at our tertiary care center from 2018 to 2023. We evaluated discrimination, calibration, and accuracy of the ACS-NSQIP-SRC and 5mFI in predicting any complication, mortality, length of hospital stay (LOS), need for readmission and supported discharge (30-day follow-up). Among 365/642 patients who underwent surgery, the 5mFI showed poor discrimination for all outcomes but good overall accuracy in the prediction of a supported discharge. In 198 operated patients with available data for the ACS-NSQIP-SRC, it underestimated complications and need for readmission while overestimated the need for supported discharge. There was no concordance between predicted and observed LOS. Among 277/642 patients undergoing non-operative management, 2/3 were frail or mild frail and had a predicted rate of any unfavorable outcome after surgery between 0 and 20%, being 95% above the average risk of each outcome. Mortality couldn't be studied because no death was reported. ACS-NSQIP-SRC and 5mFI performance in predicting outcomes after emergency cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis was poor. In the emergency cholecystectomy setting, the ACS-NSQIP-SRC may be less informative, and the 5mFI may be excessively simplistic by neglecting the multidimensional nature of frailty.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Updates in Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"481-491\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Updates in Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02128-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02128-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于老年、合并症和体弱患者数量的增加,术前风险评估工具和虚弱评分越来越普遍。本研究旨在评估ACS-NSQIP-SRC(美国外科医师学会-国家手术质量改进计划-手术风险计算器)和5mFI(5项修正虚弱指数)对急诊胆囊切除术后临床结果的预测效果。这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了2018年至2023年在我们三级保健中心住院的急性结石性胆囊炎患者。我们评估了ACS-NSQIP-SRC和5mFI在预测任何并发症、死亡率、住院时间(LOS)、再入院需求和支持出院(30天随访)方面的鉴别性、校准性和准确性。在接受手术的365/642例患者中,5mFI对所有结果的辨别能力较差,但在预测支持出院方面的总体准确性较好。在198例有ACS-NSQIP-SRC数据的手术患者中,它低估了并发症和再入院的需要,而高估了支持出院的需要。预测的LOS与观测的LOS之间没有一致性。在接受非手术治疗的277/642例患者中,2/3虚弱或轻度虚弱,手术后任何不良结果的预测率在0 - 20%之间,比每种结果的平均风险高95%。由于没有死亡报告,因此无法对死亡率进行研究。ACS-NSQIP-SRC和5mFI在预测急性胆囊炎急诊胆囊切除术后预后方面表现不佳。在急诊胆囊切除术中,ACS-NSQIP-SRC可能信息较少,5mFI可能因忽视了虚弱的多维性而过于简单化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcome prediction after emergency cholecystectomy: performance evaluation of the ACS-NSQIP surgical risk calculator and the 5-item modified frailty index.

Pre-operative risk assessment tools and frailty scores are increasingly common due to the growing number of elderly, comorbid and frail patients. This study aims to assess the performance of the ACS-NSQIP-SRC (American College of Surgeons- National Surgical Quality Improvement Program- Surgical Risk Calculator) and the 5mFI (5-items modified Frailty Index) in predicting clinical outcomes after emergency cholecystectomy. This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with acute calculous cholecystitis admitted at our tertiary care center from 2018 to 2023. We evaluated discrimination, calibration, and accuracy of the ACS-NSQIP-SRC and 5mFI in predicting any complication, mortality, length of hospital stay (LOS), need for readmission and supported discharge (30-day follow-up). Among 365/642 patients who underwent surgery, the 5mFI showed poor discrimination for all outcomes but good overall accuracy in the prediction of a supported discharge. In 198 operated patients with available data for the ACS-NSQIP-SRC, it underestimated complications and need for readmission while overestimated the need for supported discharge. There was no concordance between predicted and observed LOS. Among 277/642 patients undergoing non-operative management, 2/3 were frail or mild frail and had a predicted rate of any unfavorable outcome after surgery between 0 and 20%, being 95% above the average risk of each outcome. Mortality couldn't be studied because no death was reported. ACS-NSQIP-SRC and 5mFI performance in predicting outcomes after emergency cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis was poor. In the emergency cholecystectomy setting, the ACS-NSQIP-SRC may be less informative, and the 5mFI may be excessively simplistic by neglecting the multidimensional nature of frailty.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Updates in Surgery
Updates in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future. Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts. Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信