心脏骤停的处理。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Marinos Kosmopoulos, David G Benditt
{"title":"心脏骤停的处理。","authors":"Marinos Kosmopoulos, David G Benditt","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5683.24.06607-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sudden cardiac arrest, and in particular sudden out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a major public health concern in which survival statistics, and in particular neurologically intact survival statistics, have remained largely unimproved over many decades. Overall survival remains approximately 10%, being somewhat better in victims receiving bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and those who are found to have a shockable rhythm (i.e., VT or VF). CPR and defibrillation (especially public-access defibrillation) remain the essential immediate management tools. However, recent research has introduced several novel adjunctive interventions (e.g., mechanical compression-decompression devices, 'head-up' CPR methodology, portable extra-corporeal circulatory assistance [ECPR]) that will hopefully impact survival positively. In any case, it is apparent that no single resuscitative tool will be sufficient to markedly improve OHCA survival; the combined application of a multi-faceted strategy is needed. This might comprise bystander CPR, combined use of 'head-up' CPR along with impedance threshold valve [ITD] and active compression-decompression mechanical chest compression devices. Application of mobile ECPR devices as early as possible during resuscitation appears to improve outcomes albeit expensive and complex to deploy broadly. Employed together, these novel steps, offer the possibility of moving the survival needle in a positive direction.</p>","PeriodicalId":18668,"journal":{"name":"Minerva cardiology and angiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of sudden cardiac arrest.\",\"authors\":\"Marinos Kosmopoulos, David G Benditt\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S2724-5683.24.06607-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sudden cardiac arrest, and in particular sudden out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a major public health concern in which survival statistics, and in particular neurologically intact survival statistics, have remained largely unimproved over many decades. Overall survival remains approximately 10%, being somewhat better in victims receiving bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and those who are found to have a shockable rhythm (i.e., VT or VF). CPR and defibrillation (especially public-access defibrillation) remain the essential immediate management tools. However, recent research has introduced several novel adjunctive interventions (e.g., mechanical compression-decompression devices, 'head-up' CPR methodology, portable extra-corporeal circulatory assistance [ECPR]) that will hopefully impact survival positively. In any case, it is apparent that no single resuscitative tool will be sufficient to markedly improve OHCA survival; the combined application of a multi-faceted strategy is needed. This might comprise bystander CPR, combined use of 'head-up' CPR along with impedance threshold valve [ITD] and active compression-decompression mechanical chest compression devices. Application of mobile ECPR devices as early as possible during resuscitation appears to improve outcomes albeit expensive and complex to deploy broadly. Employed together, these novel steps, offer the possibility of moving the survival needle in a positive direction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18668,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva cardiology and angiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva cardiology and angiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5683.24.06607-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva cardiology and angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5683.24.06607-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心脏骤停,特别是院外心脏骤停(OHCA)仍然是一个主要的公共卫生问题,其中生存统计,特别是神经完整的生存统计,几十年来基本上没有得到改善。总体生存率约为10%,接受旁观者心肺复苏(CPR)和发现有震荡性心律(即VT或VF)的患者生存率略高。心肺复苏术和除颤(特别是公众可获得的除颤)仍然是必不可少的即时管理工具。然而,最近的研究引入了几种新的辅助干预措施(例如,机械压缩减压装置,“平视”CPR方法,便携式体外循环辅助[ECPR]),有望对生存率产生积极影响。在任何情况下,显然没有单一的复苏工具足以显著提高OHCA的存活率;需要综合运用多方面的战略。这可能包括旁观者CPR,结合使用“平视”CPR与阻抗阈值阀[ITD]和主动压缩减压机械胸外按压装置。在复苏期间尽早应用移动ECPR设备似乎可以改善结果,尽管费用昂贵且部署复杂。这些新颖的步骤一起使用,提供了将生存指针向积极方向移动的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Management of sudden cardiac arrest.

Sudden cardiac arrest, and in particular sudden out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a major public health concern in which survival statistics, and in particular neurologically intact survival statistics, have remained largely unimproved over many decades. Overall survival remains approximately 10%, being somewhat better in victims receiving bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and those who are found to have a shockable rhythm (i.e., VT or VF). CPR and defibrillation (especially public-access defibrillation) remain the essential immediate management tools. However, recent research has introduced several novel adjunctive interventions (e.g., mechanical compression-decompression devices, 'head-up' CPR methodology, portable extra-corporeal circulatory assistance [ECPR]) that will hopefully impact survival positively. In any case, it is apparent that no single resuscitative tool will be sufficient to markedly improve OHCA survival; the combined application of a multi-faceted strategy is needed. This might comprise bystander CPR, combined use of 'head-up' CPR along with impedance threshold valve [ITD] and active compression-decompression mechanical chest compression devices. Application of mobile ECPR devices as early as possible during resuscitation appears to improve outcomes albeit expensive and complex to deploy broadly. Employed together, these novel steps, offer the possibility of moving the survival needle in a positive direction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva cardiology and angiology
Minerva cardiology and angiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
118
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信