Jeremy C Heard, Teeto Ezeonu, Yunsoo Lee, Rajkishen Narayanan, Alec Kellish, Yoni Dulitzki, Dylan Resnick, Jeffrey Zucker, Alexander Shaer, Jose A Canseco, Jeffrey A Rihn, Barrett Woods, Alan S Hilibrand, Alexander R Vaccaro, Christopher K Kepler, Gregory D Schroeder
{"title":"评估腰椎融合术后物理治疗变量与预后之间的关系。","authors":"Jeremy C Heard, Teeto Ezeonu, Yunsoo Lee, Rajkishen Narayanan, Alec Kellish, Yoni Dulitzki, Dylan Resnick, Jeffrey Zucker, Alexander Shaer, Jose A Canseco, Jeffrey A Rihn, Barrett Woods, Alan S Hilibrand, Alexander R Vaccaro, Christopher K Kepler, Gregory D Schroeder","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to investigate how inpatient physical therapy variables impact (1) inpatient complications, (2) 90-day readmissions, (3) 1-year reoperation rates, and (4) length of stay after posterior lumbar decompression and fusion.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Previous studies have emphasized the role of early ambulation in postoperative spine patients as an effective method for improving pain and decreasing length of stay, but few studies have evaluated the efficacy of inpatient physical therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients 18 years of age or older who underwent primary 1-level or 2-level posterior lumbar decompression and fusion from 2019 to 2020 were retrospectively identified. Physical therapy data, including time to first inpatient PT session, gait trial distance achieved, post-treatment pain rating, and Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care [AM-PAC]) scores were collected using manual chart review. Surgical outcome variables included length of stay, inpatient complications, 90-day readmissions, and reoperations within 1 year of primary surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 425 patients were identified. There was no difference in hours to PT or total gait trial distance achieved between patients who experienced a complication and those that did not. Patients in the noncomplication group had higher AM-PAC scores than patients in the complication group. There was no difference with regards to time to PT, AM-PAC score, or gait trial distance achieved between readmitted patients and nonreadmitted patients or revision patients and nonrevision patients. Stepwise logistic regression showed that having a physical therapy session within 6 hours of surgery was predictive of a decreased length of stay both in all patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While inpatient physical therapy within 6 hours of surgery does not appear to impact readmissions, complications, or reoperations, surgeons should encourage early ambulation postoperatively to decrease extended hospital stays. Future investigation should seek to identify factors that delay inpatient PT in the 6 hours after surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":"38 2","pages":"E129-E134"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Association Between Physical Therapy Variables and Outcomes After Lumbar Fusion.\",\"authors\":\"Jeremy C Heard, Teeto Ezeonu, Yunsoo Lee, Rajkishen Narayanan, Alec Kellish, Yoni Dulitzki, Dylan Resnick, Jeffrey Zucker, Alexander Shaer, Jose A Canseco, Jeffrey A Rihn, Barrett Woods, Alan S Hilibrand, Alexander R Vaccaro, Christopher K Kepler, Gregory D Schroeder\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001671\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to investigate how inpatient physical therapy variables impact (1) inpatient complications, (2) 90-day readmissions, (3) 1-year reoperation rates, and (4) length of stay after posterior lumbar decompression and fusion.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Previous studies have emphasized the role of early ambulation in postoperative spine patients as an effective method for improving pain and decreasing length of stay, but few studies have evaluated the efficacy of inpatient physical therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients 18 years of age or older who underwent primary 1-level or 2-level posterior lumbar decompression and fusion from 2019 to 2020 were retrospectively identified. Physical therapy data, including time to first inpatient PT session, gait trial distance achieved, post-treatment pain rating, and Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care [AM-PAC]) scores were collected using manual chart review. Surgical outcome variables included length of stay, inpatient complications, 90-day readmissions, and reoperations within 1 year of primary surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 425 patients were identified. There was no difference in hours to PT or total gait trial distance achieved between patients who experienced a complication and those that did not. Patients in the noncomplication group had higher AM-PAC scores than patients in the complication group. There was no difference with regards to time to PT, AM-PAC score, or gait trial distance achieved between readmitted patients and nonreadmitted patients or revision patients and nonrevision patients. Stepwise logistic regression showed that having a physical therapy session within 6 hours of surgery was predictive of a decreased length of stay both in all patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While inpatient physical therapy within 6 hours of surgery does not appear to impact readmissions, complications, or reoperations, surgeons should encourage early ambulation postoperatively to decrease extended hospital stays. Future investigation should seek to identify factors that delay inpatient PT in the 6 hours after surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"volume\":\"38 2\",\"pages\":\"E129-E134\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001671\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001671","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究设计:回顾性队列研究。目的:本研究的目的是探讨住院物理治疗变量如何影响(1)住院并发症,(2)90天再入院,(3)1年再手术率,(4)后路腰椎减压融合术后住院时间。背景资料总结:以往的研究强调脊柱术后患者早期下床是一种改善疼痛和缩短住院时间的有效方法,但很少有研究评估住院物理治疗的疗效。方法:回顾性分析2019年至2020年18岁及以上行1节段或2节段后路腰椎减压融合术的患者。物理治疗数据,包括到第一次住院PT治疗的时间、达到的步态试验距离、治疗后疼痛评分和急性护理后活动测量(Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care [AM-PAC])评分。手术结果变量包括住院时间、住院并发症、90天再入院和初次手术1年内的再手术。结果:共发现425例患者。在经历并发症的患者和没有经历并发症的患者之间,到PT的时间或总步态试验距离没有差异。无并发症组患者AM-PAC评分高于并发症组患者。再入院患者和非再入院患者、翻修患者和非翻修患者在PT时间、AM-PAC评分或步态试验距离方面没有差异。逐步逻辑回归显示,在手术6小时内进行物理治疗可以预测所有患者住院时间的缩短。结论:手术后6小时内的住院物理治疗似乎不会影响再入院、并发症或再手术,外科医生应鼓励术后早期下床以减少延长住院时间。未来的调查应寻求确定延迟住院患者术后6小时PT的因素。
Evaluating the Association Between Physical Therapy Variables and Outcomes After Lumbar Fusion.
Study design: Retrospective cohort study.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate how inpatient physical therapy variables impact (1) inpatient complications, (2) 90-day readmissions, (3) 1-year reoperation rates, and (4) length of stay after posterior lumbar decompression and fusion.
Summary of background data: Previous studies have emphasized the role of early ambulation in postoperative spine patients as an effective method for improving pain and decreasing length of stay, but few studies have evaluated the efficacy of inpatient physical therapy.
Methods: Patients 18 years of age or older who underwent primary 1-level or 2-level posterior lumbar decompression and fusion from 2019 to 2020 were retrospectively identified. Physical therapy data, including time to first inpatient PT session, gait trial distance achieved, post-treatment pain rating, and Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care [AM-PAC]) scores were collected using manual chart review. Surgical outcome variables included length of stay, inpatient complications, 90-day readmissions, and reoperations within 1 year of primary surgery.
Results: Overall, 425 patients were identified. There was no difference in hours to PT or total gait trial distance achieved between patients who experienced a complication and those that did not. Patients in the noncomplication group had higher AM-PAC scores than patients in the complication group. There was no difference with regards to time to PT, AM-PAC score, or gait trial distance achieved between readmitted patients and nonreadmitted patients or revision patients and nonrevision patients. Stepwise logistic regression showed that having a physical therapy session within 6 hours of surgery was predictive of a decreased length of stay both in all patients.
Conclusions: While inpatient physical therapy within 6 hours of surgery does not appear to impact readmissions, complications, or reoperations, surgeons should encourage early ambulation postoperatively to decrease extended hospital stays. Future investigation should seek to identify factors that delay inpatient PT in the 6 hours after surgery.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure.
Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.