阿片类药物保留策略对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后疼痛和围手术期血流动力学的影响:一项随机对照研究

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Lei Wang, Xinhua Hong, Yiting Xue, Zhen Su
{"title":"阿片类药物保留策略对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后疼痛和围手术期血流动力学的影响:一项随机对照研究","authors":"Lei Wang, Xinhua Hong, Yiting Xue, Zhen Su","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-02953-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioid-sparing anesthesia(OSA) or opioid-free anesthesia(OFA) strategy can reduce postoperative pain, but the effect of different stratigies on postoperative pain for patients with high pain sensitivity remains unclear, and the effect of different stratigies on perioperative haemodynamic fluctuations remains controversial for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 173 patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly assigned into three groups: opioid-free anesthesia group(Group OFA), opioid-sparing anesthesia group(Group OSA) or opioid-based anesthesia group (Group OBA). The preoperative assessment of patients' pain sensitivity was conducted using the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ). The visual analog scale (VAS) scores were recorded at 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h postoperatively. Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) and Heart Rate (HR) were recorded at baseline(T0), after admission (T1), after induction(T2), 1 min after tracheal intubation (T3), 1 min after pneumoperitoneum (T4), and calculated as the variability of blood pressure (BPV), coefficient of variation (CV) and average real variability (ARV). Time to awake, acute pain, rescue analgesia, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and time to first exhaust were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with Group OBA, VAS scores were significantly lower in Group OFA and OSA at 2 h, 6 h and 12 h postoperatively (P < 0.05). BPV<sub>SBP</sub>, BPV<sub>DBP</sub>, BPV<sub>MAP</sub>, CV<sub>SBP</sub>, CV<sub>DBP</sub>, CV<sub>MAP</sub>, ARV<sub>DBP</sub> and ARV<sub>MAP</sub> were lower in both Group OSA and OBA compared to the Group OFA (P < 0.05). Group OSA exhibited lower BPV<sub>SBP,</sub> CV<sub>DBP</sub>, and ARV<sub>DBP</sub> compared to the OBA group (P < 0.05). In the subgroup analysis of patients with high pain sensitivity, BPV<sub>SBP</sub>, BPV<sub>DBP</sub>, BPV<sub>MAP</sub>, CV<sub>DBP</sub>, CV<sub>MAP</sub>, ARV<sub>SBP</sub>, ARV<sub>DBP</sub> and ARV<sub>MAP</sub> were lower in Group OSA compared to Group OFA (P < 0.05). BPV<sub>DBP</sub>, CV<sub>DBP</sub>, ARV<sub>SBP</sub> and ARV<sub>DBP</sub> were lower in the OSA group compared to the OBA group (P < 0.05). The time to first exhaust was significantly reduced in patients in Group OFA compared with Group OSA and OBA (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>OSA can effectively control patients' postoperative pain with lower perioperative haemodynamic variability. It also has lower perioperative haemodynamic variability and acute pain in patients with high pain sensitivity, making it suitable for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial is registered with the China Clinical Trials Registry Registration Number: ChiCTR2400093036. Retrospectively registered (date of registration: 27/11/2024).</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"100"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11849303/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of opioid sparing strategies on postoperative pain and perioperative hemodynamics in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled study.\",\"authors\":\"Lei Wang, Xinhua Hong, Yiting Xue, Zhen Su\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12871-025-02953-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioid-sparing anesthesia(OSA) or opioid-free anesthesia(OFA) strategy can reduce postoperative pain, but the effect of different stratigies on postoperative pain for patients with high pain sensitivity remains unclear, and the effect of different stratigies on perioperative haemodynamic fluctuations remains controversial for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 173 patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly assigned into three groups: opioid-free anesthesia group(Group OFA), opioid-sparing anesthesia group(Group OSA) or opioid-based anesthesia group (Group OBA). The preoperative assessment of patients' pain sensitivity was conducted using the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ). The visual analog scale (VAS) scores were recorded at 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h postoperatively. Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) and Heart Rate (HR) were recorded at baseline(T0), after admission (T1), after induction(T2), 1 min after tracheal intubation (T3), 1 min after pneumoperitoneum (T4), and calculated as the variability of blood pressure (BPV), coefficient of variation (CV) and average real variability (ARV). Time to awake, acute pain, rescue analgesia, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and time to first exhaust were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with Group OBA, VAS scores were significantly lower in Group OFA and OSA at 2 h, 6 h and 12 h postoperatively (P < 0.05). BPV<sub>SBP</sub>, BPV<sub>DBP</sub>, BPV<sub>MAP</sub>, CV<sub>SBP</sub>, CV<sub>DBP</sub>, CV<sub>MAP</sub>, ARV<sub>DBP</sub> and ARV<sub>MAP</sub> were lower in both Group OSA and OBA compared to the Group OFA (P < 0.05). Group OSA exhibited lower BPV<sub>SBP,</sub> CV<sub>DBP</sub>, and ARV<sub>DBP</sub> compared to the OBA group (P < 0.05). In the subgroup analysis of patients with high pain sensitivity, BPV<sub>SBP</sub>, BPV<sub>DBP</sub>, BPV<sub>MAP</sub>, CV<sub>DBP</sub>, CV<sub>MAP</sub>, ARV<sub>SBP</sub>, ARV<sub>DBP</sub> and ARV<sub>MAP</sub> were lower in Group OSA compared to Group OFA (P < 0.05). BPV<sub>DBP</sub>, CV<sub>DBP</sub>, ARV<sub>SBP</sub> and ARV<sub>DBP</sub> were lower in the OSA group compared to the OBA group (P < 0.05). The time to first exhaust was significantly reduced in patients in Group OFA compared with Group OSA and OBA (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>OSA can effectively control patients' postoperative pain with lower perioperative haemodynamic variability. It also has lower perioperative haemodynamic variability and acute pain in patients with high pain sensitivity, making it suitable for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial is registered with the China Clinical Trials Registry Registration Number: ChiCTR2400093036. Retrospectively registered (date of registration: 27/11/2024).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11849303/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-02953-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-02953-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:阿片保留麻醉(OSA)或无阿片麻醉(OFA)策略可以减轻术后疼痛,但不同策略对高疼痛敏感性患者术后疼痛的影响尚不清楚,不同策略对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者围手术期血流动力学波动的影响仍存在争议。方法:173例择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者随机分为无阿片类药物麻醉组(OFA组)、保留阿片类药物麻醉组(OSA组)和阿片类药物麻醉组(OBA组)。术前采用疼痛敏感性问卷(pain sensitivity Questionnaire, PSQ)评估患者的疼痛敏感性。分别于术后30 min、1 h、2 h、6 h、12 h、24 h记录视觉模拟评分(VAS)。分别在基线(T0)、入院后(T1)、诱导后(T2)、气管插管后1分钟(T3)、气腹后1分钟(T4)记录收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、平均动脉压(MAP)和心率(HR),并计算血压变异性(BPV)、变异系数(CV)和平均真实变异性(ARV)。同时记录醒觉时间、急性疼痛时间、抢救性镇痛时间、术后恶心呕吐时间(PONV)和首次排气时间。结果:与OBA组比较,OSA组和OFA组术后2 h、6 h、12 h VAS评分均显著降低(OSA组和OBA组的P SBP、BPVDBP、BPVMAP、CVSBP、CVDBP、CVMAP、ARVDBP和ARVMAP均低于OFA组(P SBP、BPVDBP、BPVMAP、CVDBP、CVDBP、ARVDBP和ARVMAP); OSA组的P SBP、BPVDBP、BPVDBP、CVDBP、ARVDBP和ARVMAP均低于OFA组(P DBP、CVDBP、CVMAP、ARVSBP、ARVDBP和ARVMAP);OSA组ARVSBP和ARVDBP均低于OBA组(P结论:OSA可有效控制患者术后疼痛,且围手术期血流动力学变异性较低。它还具有较低的围手术期血流动力学变异性和高疼痛敏感性患者的急性疼痛,使其适合腹腔镜胆囊切除术。试验注册:试验已在中国临床试验注册中心注册,注册号:ChiCTR2400093036。追溯注册(注册日期:27/11/2024)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of opioid sparing strategies on postoperative pain and perioperative hemodynamics in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled study.

Background: Opioid-sparing anesthesia(OSA) or opioid-free anesthesia(OFA) strategy can reduce postoperative pain, but the effect of different stratigies on postoperative pain for patients with high pain sensitivity remains unclear, and the effect of different stratigies on perioperative haemodynamic fluctuations remains controversial for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Methods: A total of 173 patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly assigned into three groups: opioid-free anesthesia group(Group OFA), opioid-sparing anesthesia group(Group OSA) or opioid-based anesthesia group (Group OBA). The preoperative assessment of patients' pain sensitivity was conducted using the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ). The visual analog scale (VAS) scores were recorded at 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h postoperatively. Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) and Heart Rate (HR) were recorded at baseline(T0), after admission (T1), after induction(T2), 1 min after tracheal intubation (T3), 1 min after pneumoperitoneum (T4), and calculated as the variability of blood pressure (BPV), coefficient of variation (CV) and average real variability (ARV). Time to awake, acute pain, rescue analgesia, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and time to first exhaust were also recorded.

Results: Compared with Group OBA, VAS scores were significantly lower in Group OFA and OSA at 2 h, 6 h and 12 h postoperatively (P < 0.05). BPVSBP, BPVDBP, BPVMAP, CVSBP, CVDBP, CVMAP, ARVDBP and ARVMAP were lower in both Group OSA and OBA compared to the Group OFA (P < 0.05). Group OSA exhibited lower BPVSBP, CVDBP, and ARVDBP compared to the OBA group (P < 0.05). In the subgroup analysis of patients with high pain sensitivity, BPVSBP, BPVDBP, BPVMAP, CVDBP, CVMAP, ARVSBP, ARVDBP and ARVMAP were lower in Group OSA compared to Group OFA (P < 0.05). BPVDBP, CVDBP, ARVSBP and ARVDBP were lower in the OSA group compared to the OBA group (P < 0.05). The time to first exhaust was significantly reduced in patients in Group OFA compared with Group OSA and OBA (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: OSA can effectively control patients' postoperative pain with lower perioperative haemodynamic variability. It also has lower perioperative haemodynamic variability and acute pain in patients with high pain sensitivity, making it suitable for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Trial registration: The trial is registered with the China Clinical Trials Registry Registration Number: ChiCTR2400093036. Retrospectively registered (date of registration: 27/11/2024).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信