医疗专业人员对多成分干预对衰弱出院老年人影响的看法——基于理论的评估

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Rikke Larsen Rasmussen, Laurine Nilsson, Mette Holst, Morten Villumsen, Jane Andreasen
{"title":"医疗专业人员对多成分干预对衰弱出院老年人影响的看法——基于理论的评估","authors":"Rikke Larsen Rasmussen,&nbsp;Laurine Nilsson,&nbsp;Mette Holst,&nbsp;Morten Villumsen,&nbsp;Jane Andreasen","doi":"10.1111/jep.70042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Rationale</h3>\n \n <p>Older people with frailty are at high risk of functional decline, readmissions, and other adverse health outcomes, after acute hospitalisation. Interventions should focus on strength training and nutrition, but knowledge is needed on designing sustainable interventions after discharge.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims and Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this study was to explore what healthcare professionals perceive as central for making a newly developed complex training, social, and nutritional intervention work effectively using theory-based evaluation. The intervention was a RCT study including 119 participants.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Nine semi-structured interviews and three follow-up meetings were conducted with healthcare professionals (physiotherapists, senior activity employees, dietician) who performed the intervention. Interviews were analysed for Context–Intervention–Mechanism–Outcome configurations, and findings were compared with the initial programme theory.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The training and social elements of the intervention seemed to largely function as intended. According to the healthcare professionals, the mechanisms for the training intervention were successful experiences, the approach of the physiotherapists, and the atmosphere and interactions between participants, leading to increased self-efficacy and motivation for continuing. However, goal setting and test results were used differently as motivational tools. The social intervention was perceived to work through feeling part of a community and well received in the centre. The perceived mechanisms for the nutritional intervention were increased knowledge and feelings of being seen and heard, although it seems that the impact was mixed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>According to the involved healthcare professionals, the complex training, social, and nutritional intervention seemed to work well for older people with frailty, although the nutritional intervention was received differently. The important mechanisms were the social element and the personal approach of the physiotherapists, which perceivably prompted training efforts and results and yielded good mental outcomes. The organisation of a similar multicomponent intervention should consider integrating the nutritional intervention and frame the use of goal setting and testing further. The findings provided novel insights to working mechanisms in multicomponent interventions for older people with frailty, especially regarding the social component, which may inform future interventions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.70042","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on the Impact of a Multicomponent Intervention for Older People With Frailty Discharged From Hospital–A Theory-Based Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Rikke Larsen Rasmussen,&nbsp;Laurine Nilsson,&nbsp;Mette Holst,&nbsp;Morten Villumsen,&nbsp;Jane Andreasen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jep.70042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Rationale</h3>\\n \\n <p>Older people with frailty are at high risk of functional decline, readmissions, and other adverse health outcomes, after acute hospitalisation. Interventions should focus on strength training and nutrition, but knowledge is needed on designing sustainable interventions after discharge.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims and Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>The aim of this study was to explore what healthcare professionals perceive as central for making a newly developed complex training, social, and nutritional intervention work effectively using theory-based evaluation. The intervention was a RCT study including 119 participants.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Nine semi-structured interviews and three follow-up meetings were conducted with healthcare professionals (physiotherapists, senior activity employees, dietician) who performed the intervention. Interviews were analysed for Context–Intervention–Mechanism–Outcome configurations, and findings were compared with the initial programme theory.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The training and social elements of the intervention seemed to largely function as intended. According to the healthcare professionals, the mechanisms for the training intervention were successful experiences, the approach of the physiotherapists, and the atmosphere and interactions between participants, leading to increased self-efficacy and motivation for continuing. However, goal setting and test results were used differently as motivational tools. The social intervention was perceived to work through feeling part of a community and well received in the centre. The perceived mechanisms for the nutritional intervention were increased knowledge and feelings of being seen and heard, although it seems that the impact was mixed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>According to the involved healthcare professionals, the complex training, social, and nutritional intervention seemed to work well for older people with frailty, although the nutritional intervention was received differently. The important mechanisms were the social element and the personal approach of the physiotherapists, which perceivably prompted training efforts and results and yielded good mental outcomes. The organisation of a similar multicomponent intervention should consider integrating the nutritional intervention and frame the use of goal setting and testing further. The findings provided novel insights to working mechanisms in multicomponent interventions for older people with frailty, especially regarding the social component, which may inform future interventions.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.70042\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70042\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70042","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由:老年体弱患者在急性住院后出现功能下降、再入院和其他不良健康结局的风险很高。干预措施应侧重于力量训练和营养,但在出院后设计可持续的干预措施也需要知识。目的和目标本研究的目的是探讨医疗保健专业人员认为什么是使新开发的复杂培训、社会和营养干预有效工作的核心,使用基于理论的评估。干预是一项包括119名参与者的随机对照试验研究。方法对实施干预的医疗保健专业人员(物理治疗师、高级活动员工、营养师)进行9次半结构化访谈和3次随访。对访谈进行了背景-干预-机制-结果配置分析,并将调查结果与初始方案理论进行了比较。结果干预的培训和社会因素似乎在很大程度上发挥了预期的作用。医疗专业人员认为,成功的经验、物理治疗师的方法、参与者之间的氛围和互动是培训干预的机制,从而提高了自我效能感和继续培训的动机。然而,目标设定和测试结果被不同地用作激励工具。社会干预被认为是通过感受社区的一部分而发挥作用,并在中心受到欢迎。营养干预的感知机制是增加知识和被看到和听到的感觉,尽管似乎影响是混合的。结论根据参与的医疗保健专业人员,复杂的培训、社会和营养干预似乎对虚弱的老年人有很好的效果,尽管营养干预的接受方式不同。重要的机制是社会因素和物理治疗师的个人方法,它们明显地促进了训练的努力和结果,并产生了良好的心理效果。组织类似的多成分干预应考虑整合营养干预,并进一步制定目标设定和测试的使用框架。这些发现为老年人多成分干预的工作机制提供了新的见解,特别是关于社会成分,这可能为未来的干预提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on the Impact of a Multicomponent Intervention for Older People With Frailty Discharged From Hospital–A Theory-Based Evaluation

Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on the Impact of a Multicomponent Intervention for Older People With Frailty Discharged From Hospital–A Theory-Based Evaluation

Rationale

Older people with frailty are at high risk of functional decline, readmissions, and other adverse health outcomes, after acute hospitalisation. Interventions should focus on strength training and nutrition, but knowledge is needed on designing sustainable interventions after discharge.

Aims and Objectives

The aim of this study was to explore what healthcare professionals perceive as central for making a newly developed complex training, social, and nutritional intervention work effectively using theory-based evaluation. The intervention was a RCT study including 119 participants.

Methods

Nine semi-structured interviews and three follow-up meetings were conducted with healthcare professionals (physiotherapists, senior activity employees, dietician) who performed the intervention. Interviews were analysed for Context–Intervention–Mechanism–Outcome configurations, and findings were compared with the initial programme theory.

Results

The training and social elements of the intervention seemed to largely function as intended. According to the healthcare professionals, the mechanisms for the training intervention were successful experiences, the approach of the physiotherapists, and the atmosphere and interactions between participants, leading to increased self-efficacy and motivation for continuing. However, goal setting and test results were used differently as motivational tools. The social intervention was perceived to work through feeling part of a community and well received in the centre. The perceived mechanisms for the nutritional intervention were increased knowledge and feelings of being seen and heard, although it seems that the impact was mixed.

Conclusion

According to the involved healthcare professionals, the complex training, social, and nutritional intervention seemed to work well for older people with frailty, although the nutritional intervention was received differently. The important mechanisms were the social element and the personal approach of the physiotherapists, which perceivably prompted training efforts and results and yielded good mental outcomes. The organisation of a similar multicomponent intervention should consider integrating the nutritional intervention and frame the use of goal setting and testing further. The findings provided novel insights to working mechanisms in multicomponent interventions for older people with frailty, especially regarding the social component, which may inform future interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信