使用实际平台和模拟平台教授 Excel 和 Access 的效果对比研究

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Esmail Mohebbi
{"title":"使用实际平台和模拟平台教授 Excel 和 Access 的效果对比研究","authors":"Esmail Mohebbi","doi":"10.1111/dsji.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Microsoft Excel and Access are widely used in introductory courses designed to teach the fundamentals of spreadsheet and relational database modeling skills in various disciplines. To achieve the targeted learning outcomes, instructors of these courses strive to provide students with guided, frequent, and incrementally fruitful practice with the software. Instructors often can facilitate such practice using the actual software or by employing a virtually simulated version of the software integrated into a learning management system. This article presents the results of a study that compared the effectiveness of using actual versus simulated Excel and Access environments as alternative or complementary instructional platforms in an introductory undergraduate course in information systems. The underlying study distinguished between instructor-led guidance using the actual software and autonomous self-paced instructions provided in the simulated environment while using multiple objective and subjective learning assessment tools. The mixed impacts of these scenarios promote a hybrid learning approach that uses both strategies to most effectively enhance students’ competency in Excel and Access.</p>","PeriodicalId":46210,"journal":{"name":"Decision Sciences-Journal of Innovative Education","volume":"23 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of teaching Excel and Access using actual and simulated platforms – A comparative study\",\"authors\":\"Esmail Mohebbi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dsji.70002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Microsoft Excel and Access are widely used in introductory courses designed to teach the fundamentals of spreadsheet and relational database modeling skills in various disciplines. To achieve the targeted learning outcomes, instructors of these courses strive to provide students with guided, frequent, and incrementally fruitful practice with the software. Instructors often can facilitate such practice using the actual software or by employing a virtually simulated version of the software integrated into a learning management system. This article presents the results of a study that compared the effectiveness of using actual versus simulated Excel and Access environments as alternative or complementary instructional platforms in an introductory undergraduate course in information systems. The underlying study distinguished between instructor-led guidance using the actual software and autonomous self-paced instructions provided in the simulated environment while using multiple objective and subjective learning assessment tools. The mixed impacts of these scenarios promote a hybrid learning approach that uses both strategies to most effectively enhance students’ competency in Excel and Access.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Decision Sciences-Journal of Innovative Education\",\"volume\":\"23 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Decision Sciences-Journal of Innovative Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dsji.70002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decision Sciences-Journal of Innovative Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dsji.70002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Microsoft Excel和Access在入门课程中被广泛使用,这些课程旨在教授各种学科的电子表格和关系数据库建模技能的基础知识。为了达到目标的学习效果,这些课程的讲师努力为学生提供指导,频繁的,以及增量的富有成效的软件实践。教师通常可以使用实际的软件或通过使用集成到学习管理系统中的软件的虚拟模拟版本来促进这种实践。本文介绍了一项研究的结果,该研究比较了在信息系统入门本科课程中使用实际与模拟Excel和Access环境作为替代或补充教学平台的有效性。基础研究区分了使用实际软件的教师主导指导和使用多种客观和主观学习评估工具在模拟环境中提供的自主自定进度指导。这些场景的混合影响促进了混合学习方法,使用这两种策略来最有效地提高学生在Excel和Access中的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of teaching Excel and Access using actual and simulated platforms – A comparative study

Microsoft Excel and Access are widely used in introductory courses designed to teach the fundamentals of spreadsheet and relational database modeling skills in various disciplines. To achieve the targeted learning outcomes, instructors of these courses strive to provide students with guided, frequent, and incrementally fruitful practice with the software. Instructors often can facilitate such practice using the actual software or by employing a virtually simulated version of the software integrated into a learning management system. This article presents the results of a study that compared the effectiveness of using actual versus simulated Excel and Access environments as alternative or complementary instructional platforms in an introductory undergraduate course in information systems. The underlying study distinguished between instructor-led guidance using the actual software and autonomous self-paced instructions provided in the simulated environment while using multiple objective and subjective learning assessment tools. The mixed impacts of these scenarios promote a hybrid learning approach that uses both strategies to most effectively enhance students’ competency in Excel and Access.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Decision Sciences-Journal of Innovative Education
Decision Sciences-Journal of Innovative Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
36.80%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信