为澳大利亚医疗保健制定基于共识的自然处方框架:德尔菲研究

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Hope Foley, Eric Brymer, Matthew Leach, Thomas Astell-Burt, Xiaoqi Feng, Helen Clark, Vinathe Sharma-Brymer, James R. Baker
{"title":"为澳大利亚医疗保健制定基于共识的自然处方框架:德尔菲研究","authors":"Hope Foley,&nbsp;Eric Brymer,&nbsp;Matthew Leach,&nbsp;Thomas Astell-Burt,&nbsp;Xiaoqi Feng,&nbsp;Helen Clark,&nbsp;Vinathe Sharma-Brymer,&nbsp;James R. Baker","doi":"10.1155/hsc/9529532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> With growing interest in nature-based interventions for health, establishing implementation frameworks for prescribing nature in diverse settings is crucial. This study aims to develop and validate a nature prescribing framework tailored for the Australian healthcare context, employing a Delphi methodology to harness expert consensus.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> The study utilised a two-round Delphi technique to gather insights from experts across various health and environmental sectors. Participants included healthcare providers, managers and policymakers engaged in or knowledgeable about nature prescribing. The initial framework, which was informed by earlier interviews with parties who prescribe or provide nature-based health interventions, was refined through the Delphi process, aiming for consensus on implementation criteria and associated practices.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> Sixteen experts participated in the first Delphi round, with 13 completing the second round. Participants reached consensus on five essential domains of the nature prescribing framework, which included Community: consultation and customisation, Systems: building partnerships and networks, Prescribers: cultivating awareness and capacity, Providing prescriptions: psychosocial foundations and External settings: interfacing social and natural environments. Perceived barriers and enablers to application were considered within the framework, including contextual and environmental factors, awareness and capacity among prescribers and public, and the role of infrastructure support.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> The nature prescribing framework offers a structured approach to integrating nature-based activities into health practices, addressing both individual and community health needs. It is adaptable to various Australian settings, promoting broader implementation of nature-based prescriptions. Future research should focus on implementing and evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of the framework in diverse demographic and geographic contexts.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48195,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Care in the Community","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hsc/9529532","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing a Consensus-Based Nature Prescribing Framework for Australian Healthcare: A Delphi Study\",\"authors\":\"Hope Foley,&nbsp;Eric Brymer,&nbsp;Matthew Leach,&nbsp;Thomas Astell-Burt,&nbsp;Xiaoqi Feng,&nbsp;Helen Clark,&nbsp;Vinathe Sharma-Brymer,&nbsp;James R. Baker\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/hsc/9529532\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p><b>Background:</b> With growing interest in nature-based interventions for health, establishing implementation frameworks for prescribing nature in diverse settings is crucial. This study aims to develop and validate a nature prescribing framework tailored for the Australian healthcare context, employing a Delphi methodology to harness expert consensus.</p>\\n <p><b>Methods:</b> The study utilised a two-round Delphi technique to gather insights from experts across various health and environmental sectors. Participants included healthcare providers, managers and policymakers engaged in or knowledgeable about nature prescribing. The initial framework, which was informed by earlier interviews with parties who prescribe or provide nature-based health interventions, was refined through the Delphi process, aiming for consensus on implementation criteria and associated practices.</p>\\n <p><b>Results:</b> Sixteen experts participated in the first Delphi round, with 13 completing the second round. Participants reached consensus on five essential domains of the nature prescribing framework, which included Community: consultation and customisation, Systems: building partnerships and networks, Prescribers: cultivating awareness and capacity, Providing prescriptions: psychosocial foundations and External settings: interfacing social and natural environments. Perceived barriers and enablers to application were considered within the framework, including contextual and environmental factors, awareness and capacity among prescribers and public, and the role of infrastructure support.</p>\\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> The nature prescribing framework offers a structured approach to integrating nature-based activities into health practices, addressing both individual and community health needs. It is adaptable to various Australian settings, promoting broader implementation of nature-based prescriptions. Future research should focus on implementing and evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of the framework in diverse demographic and geographic contexts.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health & Social Care in the Community\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hsc/9529532\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health & Social Care in the Community\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hsc/9529532\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Social Care in the Community","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hsc/9529532","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随着人们对基于自然的保健干预措施的兴趣日益浓厚,建立在不同环境中规定自然的实施框架至关重要。本研究旨在开发和验证为澳大利亚医疗环境量身定制的自然处方框架,采用德尔菲方法来利用专家共识。方法:该研究利用两轮德尔菲技术收集来自各个卫生和环境部门的专家的见解。参与者包括从事或了解自然处方的医疗保健提供者、管理人员和政策制定者。最初的框架是根据早先与规定或提供基于自然的卫生干预措施的各方的访谈得出的,并通过德尔菲程序加以完善,旨在就实施标准和相关做法达成共识。结果:16位专家参与了第一轮德尔菲,13位专家完成了第二轮德尔菲。与会者就自然处方框架的五个基本领域达成共识,其中包括社区:咨询和定制;系统:建立伙伴关系和网络;开处方者:培养认识和能力;提供处方:心理社会基础;外部环境:连接社会和自然环境。在框架内考虑了可感知的应用障碍和推动因素,包括上下文和环境因素、处方者和公众的意识和能力,以及基础设施支持的作用。结论:自然处方框架提供了一种结构化的方法,将基于自然的活动纳入卫生实践,满足个人和社区的卫生需求。它适用于澳大利亚的各种环境,促进更广泛地实施基于自然的处方。未来的研究应侧重于在不同人口和地理背景下实施和评估该框架的可行性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Developing a Consensus-Based Nature Prescribing Framework for Australian Healthcare: A Delphi Study

Developing a Consensus-Based Nature Prescribing Framework for Australian Healthcare: A Delphi Study

Background: With growing interest in nature-based interventions for health, establishing implementation frameworks for prescribing nature in diverse settings is crucial. This study aims to develop and validate a nature prescribing framework tailored for the Australian healthcare context, employing a Delphi methodology to harness expert consensus.

Methods: The study utilised a two-round Delphi technique to gather insights from experts across various health and environmental sectors. Participants included healthcare providers, managers and policymakers engaged in or knowledgeable about nature prescribing. The initial framework, which was informed by earlier interviews with parties who prescribe or provide nature-based health interventions, was refined through the Delphi process, aiming for consensus on implementation criteria and associated practices.

Results: Sixteen experts participated in the first Delphi round, with 13 completing the second round. Participants reached consensus on five essential domains of the nature prescribing framework, which included Community: consultation and customisation, Systems: building partnerships and networks, Prescribers: cultivating awareness and capacity, Providing prescriptions: psychosocial foundations and External settings: interfacing social and natural environments. Perceived barriers and enablers to application were considered within the framework, including contextual and environmental factors, awareness and capacity among prescribers and public, and the role of infrastructure support.

Conclusion: The nature prescribing framework offers a structured approach to integrating nature-based activities into health practices, addressing both individual and community health needs. It is adaptable to various Australian settings, promoting broader implementation of nature-based prescriptions. Future research should focus on implementing and evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of the framework in diverse demographic and geographic contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: Health and Social Care in the community is an essential journal for anyone involved in nursing, social work, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, general practice, health psychology, health economy, primary health care and the promotion of health. It is an international peer-reviewed journal supporting interdisciplinary collaboration on policy and practice within health and social care in the community. The journal publishes: - Original research papers in all areas of health and social care - Topical health and social care review articles - Policy and practice evaluations - Book reviews - Special issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信