出售数字医疗的投资回报。

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Telemedicine reports Pub Date : 2025-01-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1089/tmr.2024.0069
Judd E Hollander, Gregg Meyer, Ralph Derrickson, Baligh Yehia, Anne Docimo
{"title":"出售数字医疗的投资回报。","authors":"Judd E Hollander, Gregg Meyer, Ralph Derrickson, Baligh Yehia, Anne Docimo","doi":"10.1089/tmr.2024.0069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advancing digital health requires a realistic conversation that moves past innovation and evaluates digital tools the same as any other device being introduced into the health system. There needs to be a focus on return on investment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of a symposium, we presented hypothetical pitches to an expert panel. The experts include representatives from health systems, payers, and investors. The pitches were related to remote patient monitoring, tele-triage in the emergency department, and comprehensive in-patient telemedicine program including virtual sitting and e-nursing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although each pitch led to a different discussion, there was uniform agreement that health systems should focus on whether the proposal helps solve an institutional problem; the payment model in which the product can be used (value-based, fee-for-service, or both) needs to be identified; fitting the new product into preexisting workflow (included electronic health system integration) is critical; there needs to be an understanding of whether patients and providers engage with it; and there needs to be a clear return on investment.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Navigating complex decision-making in health care requires a blend of strategic foresight, practical considerations, and a deep understanding of organizational dynamics. Rather than a specific strategic plan focused on digital or virtual care, there should be a focus on the enterprise strategic plan and how can digital enable that.</p>","PeriodicalId":94218,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":"6 1","pages":"44-49"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11839514/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selling the Return on Investment for Digital Health.\",\"authors\":\"Judd E Hollander, Gregg Meyer, Ralph Derrickson, Baligh Yehia, Anne Docimo\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/tmr.2024.0069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advancing digital health requires a realistic conversation that moves past innovation and evaluates digital tools the same as any other device being introduced into the health system. There needs to be a focus on return on investment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of a symposium, we presented hypothetical pitches to an expert panel. The experts include representatives from health systems, payers, and investors. The pitches were related to remote patient monitoring, tele-triage in the emergency department, and comprehensive in-patient telemedicine program including virtual sitting and e-nursing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although each pitch led to a different discussion, there was uniform agreement that health systems should focus on whether the proposal helps solve an institutional problem; the payment model in which the product can be used (value-based, fee-for-service, or both) needs to be identified; fitting the new product into preexisting workflow (included electronic health system integration) is critical; there needs to be an understanding of whether patients and providers engage with it; and there needs to be a clear return on investment.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Navigating complex decision-making in health care requires a blend of strategic foresight, practical considerations, and a deep understanding of organizational dynamics. Rather than a specific strategic plan focused on digital or virtual care, there should be a focus on the enterprise strategic plan and how can digital enable that.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine reports\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"44-49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11839514/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2024.0069\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2024.0069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:推进数字健康需要一个现实的对话,推动过去的创新和评估数字工具,就像任何其他设备被引入卫生系统一样。我们需要关注投资回报。方法:作为研讨会的一部分,我们向专家小组提出了假设的投球。专家包括来自卫生系统、支付方和投资者的代表。这些项目涉及远程病人监护、急诊部远程分诊以及包括虚拟坐诊和电子护理在内的综合住院远程医疗项目。结果:尽管每个提案都引发了不同的讨论,但一致认为卫生系统应该关注提案是否有助于解决制度问题;需要确定产品的付费模式(基于价值、按服务收费或两者兼而有之);将新产品融入现有工作流程(包括电子卫生系统集成)至关重要;需要了解患者和提供者是否参与其中;投资需要有明确的回报。讨论:在医疗保健中进行复杂的决策需要将战略远见、实际考虑和对组织动力学的深刻理解结合起来。与其制定一个专注于数字化或虚拟医疗的具体战略计划,不如将重点放在企业战略计划以及数字化如何实现这一目标上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Selling the Return on Investment for Digital Health.

Background: Advancing digital health requires a realistic conversation that moves past innovation and evaluates digital tools the same as any other device being introduced into the health system. There needs to be a focus on return on investment.

Methods: As part of a symposium, we presented hypothetical pitches to an expert panel. The experts include representatives from health systems, payers, and investors. The pitches were related to remote patient monitoring, tele-triage in the emergency department, and comprehensive in-patient telemedicine program including virtual sitting and e-nursing.

Results: Although each pitch led to a different discussion, there was uniform agreement that health systems should focus on whether the proposal helps solve an institutional problem; the payment model in which the product can be used (value-based, fee-for-service, or both) needs to be identified; fitting the new product into preexisting workflow (included electronic health system integration) is critical; there needs to be an understanding of whether patients and providers engage with it; and there needs to be a clear return on investment.

Discussion: Navigating complex decision-making in health care requires a blend of strategic foresight, practical considerations, and a deep understanding of organizational dynamics. Rather than a specific strategic plan focused on digital or virtual care, there should be a focus on the enterprise strategic plan and how can digital enable that.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信