不同的浮游植物大小类别对生物和非生物因素的反应不同。

IF 5.1 Q1 ECOLOGY
ISME communications Pub Date : 2025-02-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/ismeco/ycae148
Stefanie Eyring, Ewa Merz, Marta Reyes, Pinelopi Ntetsika, Stuart R Dennis, Peter D F Isles, Sreenath Kyathanahally, Marco Baity-Jesi, Sze-Wing To, Agostino Merico, Francesco Pomati
{"title":"不同的浮游植物大小类别对生物和非生物因素的反应不同。","authors":"Stefanie Eyring, Ewa Merz, Marta Reyes, Pinelopi Ntetsika, Stuart R Dennis, Peter D F Isles, Sreenath Kyathanahally, Marco Baity-Jesi, Sze-Wing To, Agostino Merico, Francesco Pomati","doi":"10.1093/ismeco/ycae148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The interplay between abiotic (resource supply, temperature) and biotic (grazing) factors determines growth and loss processes in phytoplankton through resource competition and trophic interactions, which are mediated by morphological traits like size. Here, we study the relative importance of grazers, water physics, and chemistry on the daily net accumulation rates (ARs) of individual phytoplankton from natural communities, grouped into six size classes from circa 10 to 500 μm. Using a Random Forest modelling approach and 4 years of daily data from a lake, we find that water temperature is generally a pivotal control of all phytoplankton ARs. At the same time, nutrients and light are important for the smallest and the largest classes. Mesozooplankton abundance is a key predictor of the AR for small phytoplankton, with microzooplankton being important for the middle-size range. In our data, large and small phytoplankton have different (seasonal) blooming patterns: small forms are favoured by low temperature and grazing, and high phosphorus levels. Larger forms show positive ARs at high temperatures and low phosphorus (being relatively insensitive to zooplankton grazing). These results help us understand the opportunities and limitations of using size to explain and model phytoplankton responses to biotic and abiotic environmental change.</p>","PeriodicalId":73516,"journal":{"name":"ISME communications","volume":"5 1","pages":"ycae148"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11843441/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distinct phytoplankton size classes respond differently to biotic and abiotic factors.\",\"authors\":\"Stefanie Eyring, Ewa Merz, Marta Reyes, Pinelopi Ntetsika, Stuart R Dennis, Peter D F Isles, Sreenath Kyathanahally, Marco Baity-Jesi, Sze-Wing To, Agostino Merico, Francesco Pomati\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ismeco/ycae148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The interplay between abiotic (resource supply, temperature) and biotic (grazing) factors determines growth and loss processes in phytoplankton through resource competition and trophic interactions, which are mediated by morphological traits like size. Here, we study the relative importance of grazers, water physics, and chemistry on the daily net accumulation rates (ARs) of individual phytoplankton from natural communities, grouped into six size classes from circa 10 to 500 μm. Using a Random Forest modelling approach and 4 years of daily data from a lake, we find that water temperature is generally a pivotal control of all phytoplankton ARs. At the same time, nutrients and light are important for the smallest and the largest classes. Mesozooplankton abundance is a key predictor of the AR for small phytoplankton, with microzooplankton being important for the middle-size range. In our data, large and small phytoplankton have different (seasonal) blooming patterns: small forms are favoured by low temperature and grazing, and high phosphorus levels. Larger forms show positive ARs at high temperatures and low phosphorus (being relatively insensitive to zooplankton grazing). These results help us understand the opportunities and limitations of using size to explain and model phytoplankton responses to biotic and abiotic environmental change.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISME communications\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"ycae148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11843441/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISME communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ismeco/ycae148\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISME communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ismeco/ycae148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

非生物因素(资源供应、温度)和生物因素(放牧)之间的相互作用通过资源竞争和营养相互作用决定了浮游植物的生长和损失过程,而资源竞争和营养相互作用是由大小等形态特征介导的。本文研究了食草动物、水体物理和化学对天然浮游植物群落日净积累速率(ARs)的相对重要性,将浮游植物群落分为6个大小类别,范围约为10 ~ 500 μm。利用随机森林建模方法和湖泊4年的日常数据,我们发现水温通常是所有浮游植物ar的关键控制因素。同时,营养和光线对最小和最大的种类都很重要。中浮游动物丰度是小型浮游植物AR的关键预测因子,而微型浮游动物对中等大小的浮游植物非常重要。在我们的数据中,大型和小型浮游植物有不同的(季节性)开花模式:小型浮游植物受低温和放牧以及高磷水平的影响。较大的形态在高温和低磷条件下显示阳性ar(对浮游动物放牧相对不敏感)。这些结果有助于我们理解利用大小来解释和模拟浮游植物对生物和非生物环境变化的反应的机会和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Distinct phytoplankton size classes respond differently to biotic and abiotic factors.

The interplay between abiotic (resource supply, temperature) and biotic (grazing) factors determines growth and loss processes in phytoplankton through resource competition and trophic interactions, which are mediated by morphological traits like size. Here, we study the relative importance of grazers, water physics, and chemistry on the daily net accumulation rates (ARs) of individual phytoplankton from natural communities, grouped into six size classes from circa 10 to 500 μm. Using a Random Forest modelling approach and 4 years of daily data from a lake, we find that water temperature is generally a pivotal control of all phytoplankton ARs. At the same time, nutrients and light are important for the smallest and the largest classes. Mesozooplankton abundance is a key predictor of the AR for small phytoplankton, with microzooplankton being important for the middle-size range. In our data, large and small phytoplankton have different (seasonal) blooming patterns: small forms are favoured by low temperature and grazing, and high phosphorus levels. Larger forms show positive ARs at high temperatures and low phosphorus (being relatively insensitive to zooplankton grazing). These results help us understand the opportunities and limitations of using size to explain and model phytoplankton responses to biotic and abiotic environmental change.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信