伤口管理,愈合和早期假肢康复:第2部分-物理生物标志物的范围审查。

Q3 Medicine
Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.33137/cpoj.v7i2.43716
H Williams-Reid, A Johannesson, A Buis
{"title":"伤口管理,愈合和早期假肢康复:第2部分-物理生物标志物的范围审查。","authors":"H Williams-Reid, A Johannesson, A Buis","doi":"10.33137/cpoj.v7i2.43716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The timely provision of load-bearing prostheses significantly reduces healthcare costs and lowers post-amputation mortality risk. However, current methods for assessing residuum health remain subjective, underscoring the need for standardized, evidence-based approaches incorporating physical biomarkers to evaluate residual limb healing and determine readiness for prosthetic rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This review aimed to identify predictive, diagnostic, and indicative physical biomarkers of healing of the tissues and structures found in the residual limbs of adults with amputation.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A scoping review was conducted following Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and PRISMA-ScR guidance. Searches using \"biomarkers\", \"wound healing\", and \"amputation\" were performed on May 6, 2023, on Web of Science, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, PubMed, and CINAHL databases. Inclusion criteria were: 1) References to physical biomarkers and healing; 2) Residuum tissue healing; 3) Clear methodology with ethical approval; 4) Published from 2017 onwards. Articles were assessed for quality (QualSyst tool) and evidence level (JBI system), and categorized by study, wound, and model type. Physical biomarkers that were repeated not just within categories, but across more than one of the study categories were reported on.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The search strategy identified 3,306 sources, 157 of which met the inclusion criteria. Histology was the most frequently repeated physical biomarker used in 64 sources, offering crucial diagnostic insights into cellular healing processes. Additional repeated indicative and predictive physical biomarkers, including ankle-brachial index, oxygenation measures, perfusion, and blood pulse and pressure measurements, were reported in 25, 19, 13, and 12 sources, respectively, providing valuable data on tissue oxygenation and vascular health.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultimately, adopting a multifaceted approach that integrates a diverse array of physical biomarkers (accounting for physiological factors and comorbidities known to influence healing) may substantially enhance our understanding of the healing process and inform the development of effective rehabilitation strategies for individuals undergoing amputation.</p>","PeriodicalId":32763,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal","volume":"7 2","pages":"43716"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11844764/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wound management, healing, and early prosthetic rehabilitation: Part 2 - A scoping review of physical biomarkers.\",\"authors\":\"H Williams-Reid, A Johannesson, A Buis\",\"doi\":\"10.33137/cpoj.v7i2.43716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The timely provision of load-bearing prostheses significantly reduces healthcare costs and lowers post-amputation mortality risk. However, current methods for assessing residuum health remain subjective, underscoring the need for standardized, evidence-based approaches incorporating physical biomarkers to evaluate residual limb healing and determine readiness for prosthetic rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This review aimed to identify predictive, diagnostic, and indicative physical biomarkers of healing of the tissues and structures found in the residual limbs of adults with amputation.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A scoping review was conducted following Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and PRISMA-ScR guidance. Searches using \\\"biomarkers\\\", \\\"wound healing\\\", and \\\"amputation\\\" were performed on May 6, 2023, on Web of Science, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, PubMed, and CINAHL databases. Inclusion criteria were: 1) References to physical biomarkers and healing; 2) Residuum tissue healing; 3) Clear methodology with ethical approval; 4) Published from 2017 onwards. Articles were assessed for quality (QualSyst tool) and evidence level (JBI system), and categorized by study, wound, and model type. Physical biomarkers that were repeated not just within categories, but across more than one of the study categories were reported on.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The search strategy identified 3,306 sources, 157 of which met the inclusion criteria. Histology was the most frequently repeated physical biomarker used in 64 sources, offering crucial diagnostic insights into cellular healing processes. Additional repeated indicative and predictive physical biomarkers, including ankle-brachial index, oxygenation measures, perfusion, and blood pulse and pressure measurements, were reported in 25, 19, 13, and 12 sources, respectively, providing valuable data on tissue oxygenation and vascular health.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultimately, adopting a multifaceted approach that integrates a diverse array of physical biomarkers (accounting for physiological factors and comorbidities known to influence healing) may substantially enhance our understanding of the healing process and inform the development of effective rehabilitation strategies for individuals undergoing amputation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal\",\"volume\":\"7 2\",\"pages\":\"43716\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11844764/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v7i2.43716\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v7i2.43716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:及时提供负重假体可显著降低医疗费用并降低截肢后死亡风险。然而,目前评估残肢健康的方法仍然是主观的,强调需要标准化的、基于证据的方法,包括物理生物标志物来评估残肢愈合并确定假肢康复的准备情况。目的:本综述旨在确定截肢成人残肢组织和结构愈合的预测性、诊断性和指示性物理生物标志物。方法:根据乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)和PRISMA-ScR指南进行范围审查。使用“生物标志物”、“伤口愈合”和“截肢”于2023年5月6日在Web of Science、Ovid MEDLINE、Ovid Embase、Scopus、Cochrane、PubMed和CINAHL数据库上进行搜索。纳入标准为:1)参考物理生物标志物和愈合;2)残余组织愈合;3)方法明确,伦理认可;4) 2017年以后出版。对文章的质量(QualSyst工具)和证据水平(JBI系统)进行评估,并按研究、伤口和模型类型进行分类。物理生物标志物不仅在类别内重复,而且在多个研究类别中重复。结果:搜索策略确定了3306个来源,其中157个符合纳入标准。组织学是64个来源中使用频率最高的物理生物标志物,为细胞愈合过程提供了重要的诊断见解。其他重复性指示性和预测性物理生物标志物,包括踝-肱指数、氧合测量、灌注、脉搏和血压测量,分别在25、19、13和12个来源中报道,提供了关于组织氧合和血管健康的有价值数据。结论:最终,采用多方面的方法,整合各种物理生物标志物(考虑已知影响愈合的生理因素和合并症),可以大大提高我们对愈合过程的理解,并为截肢患者制定有效的康复策略提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Wound management, healing, and early prosthetic rehabilitation: Part 2 - A scoping review of physical biomarkers.

Background: The timely provision of load-bearing prostheses significantly reduces healthcare costs and lowers post-amputation mortality risk. However, current methods for assessing residuum health remain subjective, underscoring the need for standardized, evidence-based approaches incorporating physical biomarkers to evaluate residual limb healing and determine readiness for prosthetic rehabilitation.

Objectives: This review aimed to identify predictive, diagnostic, and indicative physical biomarkers of healing of the tissues and structures found in the residual limbs of adults with amputation.

Methodology: A scoping review was conducted following Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and PRISMA-ScR guidance. Searches using "biomarkers", "wound healing", and "amputation" were performed on May 6, 2023, on Web of Science, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, PubMed, and CINAHL databases. Inclusion criteria were: 1) References to physical biomarkers and healing; 2) Residuum tissue healing; 3) Clear methodology with ethical approval; 4) Published from 2017 onwards. Articles were assessed for quality (QualSyst tool) and evidence level (JBI system), and categorized by study, wound, and model type. Physical biomarkers that were repeated not just within categories, but across more than one of the study categories were reported on.

Findings: The search strategy identified 3,306 sources, 157 of which met the inclusion criteria. Histology was the most frequently repeated physical biomarker used in 64 sources, offering crucial diagnostic insights into cellular healing processes. Additional repeated indicative and predictive physical biomarkers, including ankle-brachial index, oxygenation measures, perfusion, and blood pulse and pressure measurements, were reported in 25, 19, 13, and 12 sources, respectively, providing valuable data on tissue oxygenation and vascular health.

Conclusion: Ultimately, adopting a multifaceted approach that integrates a diverse array of physical biomarkers (accounting for physiological factors and comorbidities known to influence healing) may substantially enhance our understanding of the healing process and inform the development of effective rehabilitation strategies for individuals undergoing amputation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Prosthetics  Orthotics Journal
Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信