平衡盐溶液与生理盐水作为小儿感染性休克复苏液:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Sudha Chandelia, Suresh Kumar Angurana, Shankar Prasad, Mithlesh Kumar Tiwari, Muralidharan Jayashree, Karthi Nallasamy, Arun Bansal
{"title":"平衡盐溶液与生理盐水作为小儿感染性休克复苏液:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Sudha Chandelia, Suresh Kumar Angurana, Shankar Prasad, Mithlesh Kumar Tiwari, Muralidharan Jayashree, Karthi Nallasamy, Arun Bansal","doi":"10.1177/08850666251315705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveFluid resuscitation is an important intervention in children with septic shock. The composition of resuscitation fluid is a matter of debate. Our aim was to study the effects of balanced salt solution <b>(</b>BSS) versus normal saline (NS) for resuscitation in pediatric septic shock.Data sourcesWe searched MEDLINE, Embase, LILAC, Cochrane Collaboration, ClinicalTrials.gov, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform.Study selectionTwo independent authors screened title and abstracts and then full papers of included studies.Data extractionTwo authors extracted data from full papers independently. Random-effects model was used for analysis of RCTs. We used Cochrane's risk of bias tool for assessing the quality of studies. Primary outcome was mortality and secondary outcomes were rates of acute kidney injury (AKI), need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), and adverse effects (hyperchloremia, metabolic acidosis, and fluid overload); and duration of PICU and hospital stay.Data synthesisFive RCTs with 992 children were included. Resuscitation with BSS versus NS was not associated with reduction in mortality (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.45-1.50, p = 0.52; RCTs = 5); with similar results on sensitivity analysis (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.41-1.41, p = 0.52; 4 RCTs = 4). However, resuscitation with BSS was associated with lower rates of AKI (sensitivity analysis RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.50-0.82, p = 0.0004; RCTs = 3); lesser need for RRT (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.35-0.76, p = 0.0008; RCTs = 2); and lower rate of hyperchloremia (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.62-0.87, p = 0.0002; RCTs = 3). The data is scant for other secondary outcomes (metabolic acidosis, fluid overload, and duration of PICU and hospital stay) to make any suggestions. The overall 'risk of bias' was low and unclear in most domains.ConclusionUse of BSS as resuscitation fluid in pediatric septic shock was not associated with reduction in mortality. However, BSS was associated with decreased risk of AKI, need of RRT and hyperchloremia.Clinical Trial Registration (if any)PROSPERO (CRD42022332208).</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"8850666251315705"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balanced Salt Solution Versus Normal Saline as Resuscitation Fluid in Pediatric Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Sudha Chandelia, Suresh Kumar Angurana, Shankar Prasad, Mithlesh Kumar Tiwari, Muralidharan Jayashree, Karthi Nallasamy, Arun Bansal\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08850666251315705\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveFluid resuscitation is an important intervention in children with septic shock. The composition of resuscitation fluid is a matter of debate. Our aim was to study the effects of balanced salt solution <b>(</b>BSS) versus normal saline (NS) for resuscitation in pediatric septic shock.Data sourcesWe searched MEDLINE, Embase, LILAC, Cochrane Collaboration, ClinicalTrials.gov, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform.Study selectionTwo independent authors screened title and abstracts and then full papers of included studies.Data extractionTwo authors extracted data from full papers independently. Random-effects model was used for analysis of RCTs. We used Cochrane's risk of bias tool for assessing the quality of studies. Primary outcome was mortality and secondary outcomes were rates of acute kidney injury (AKI), need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), and adverse effects (hyperchloremia, metabolic acidosis, and fluid overload); and duration of PICU and hospital stay.Data synthesisFive RCTs with 992 children were included. Resuscitation with BSS versus NS was not associated with reduction in mortality (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.45-1.50, p = 0.52; RCTs = 5); with similar results on sensitivity analysis (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.41-1.41, p = 0.52; 4 RCTs = 4). However, resuscitation with BSS was associated with lower rates of AKI (sensitivity analysis RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.50-0.82, p = 0.0004; RCTs = 3); lesser need for RRT (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.35-0.76, p = 0.0008; RCTs = 2); and lower rate of hyperchloremia (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.62-0.87, p = 0.0002; RCTs = 3). The data is scant for other secondary outcomes (metabolic acidosis, fluid overload, and duration of PICU and hospital stay) to make any suggestions. The overall 'risk of bias' was low and unclear in most domains.ConclusionUse of BSS as resuscitation fluid in pediatric septic shock was not associated with reduction in mortality. However, BSS was associated with decreased risk of AKI, need of RRT and hyperchloremia.Clinical Trial Registration (if any)PROSPERO (CRD42022332208).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8850666251315705\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666251315705\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666251315705","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:液体复苏是儿童感染性休克的重要干预措施。复苏液的成分是一个有争议的问题。我们的目的是研究平衡盐溶液(BSS)与生理盐水(NS)在小儿感染性休克复苏中的作用。数据来源:检索MEDLINE、Embase、LILAC、Cochrane Collaboration、ClinicalTrials.gov和世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台。研究选择:两位独立作者筛选纳入研究的标题和摘要,然后是全文。数据提取:两位作者独立从全文中提取数据。随机对照试验采用随机效应模型进行分析。我们使用Cochrane的偏倚风险工具来评估研究的质量。主要结局是死亡率,次要结局是急性肾损伤(AKI)的发生率、肾脏替代治疗(RRT)的需要和不良反应(高氯血症、代谢性酸中毒和体液超载);PICU和住院时间。数据综合:纳入5项随机对照试验,共992名儿童。与NS相比,BSS复苏与死亡率降低无关(RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.45-1.50, p = 0.52;rct = 5);敏感性分析结果相似(RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.41-1.41, p = 0.52;4项随机对照试验= 4)。然而,BSS复苏与AKI发生率较低相关(敏感性分析RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.50-0.82, p = 0.0004;rct = 3);较低的RRT需求(RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.35-0.76, p = 0.0008;rct = 2);高氯血症发生率较低(RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.62 ~ 0.87, p = 0.0002;rct = 3)。其他次要结局(代谢性酸中毒、体液超载、PICU和住院时间)的数据不足,无法提出任何建议。在大多数领域,总体“偏倚风险”较低且不明确。结论:在小儿感染性休克中使用BSS作为复苏液与死亡率的降低无关。然而,BSS与AKI风险降低、RRT需要和高氯血症相关。临床试验注册(如有):PROSPERO (CRD42022332208)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Balanced Salt Solution Versus Normal Saline as Resuscitation Fluid in Pediatric Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

ObjectiveFluid resuscitation is an important intervention in children with septic shock. The composition of resuscitation fluid is a matter of debate. Our aim was to study the effects of balanced salt solution (BSS) versus normal saline (NS) for resuscitation in pediatric septic shock.Data sourcesWe searched MEDLINE, Embase, LILAC, Cochrane Collaboration, ClinicalTrials.gov, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform.Study selectionTwo independent authors screened title and abstracts and then full papers of included studies.Data extractionTwo authors extracted data from full papers independently. Random-effects model was used for analysis of RCTs. We used Cochrane's risk of bias tool for assessing the quality of studies. Primary outcome was mortality and secondary outcomes were rates of acute kidney injury (AKI), need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), and adverse effects (hyperchloremia, metabolic acidosis, and fluid overload); and duration of PICU and hospital stay.Data synthesisFive RCTs with 992 children were included. Resuscitation with BSS versus NS was not associated with reduction in mortality (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.45-1.50, p = 0.52; RCTs = 5); with similar results on sensitivity analysis (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.41-1.41, p = 0.52; 4 RCTs = 4). However, resuscitation with BSS was associated with lower rates of AKI (sensitivity analysis RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.50-0.82, p = 0.0004; RCTs = 3); lesser need for RRT (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.35-0.76, p = 0.0008; RCTs = 2); and lower rate of hyperchloremia (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.62-0.87, p = 0.0002; RCTs = 3). The data is scant for other secondary outcomes (metabolic acidosis, fluid overload, and duration of PICU and hospital stay) to make any suggestions. The overall 'risk of bias' was low and unclear in most domains.ConclusionUse of BSS as resuscitation fluid in pediatric septic shock was not associated with reduction in mortality. However, BSS was associated with decreased risk of AKI, need of RRT and hyperchloremia.Clinical Trial Registration (if any)PROSPERO (CRD42022332208).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信