Toru Yoshino, Zao Zhang, Ryota Sato, Stanley Lipkowitz, Takeo Fujii
{"title":"三阴性乳腺癌病理完全缓解对长期生存的影响。","authors":"Toru Yoshino, Zao Zhang, Ryota Sato, Stanley Lipkowitz, Takeo Fujii","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkaf022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pathological complete response has been used as a primary endpoint in neoadjuvant trials in early stage triple-negative breast cancer, and the Food and Drug Administration accepted pathological complete response as a surrogate endpoint for long-term survival outcomes in high-risk early stage breast cancer for new drug approval. However, there is insufficient trial-level data to robustly support pathological complete response as a surrogate for long-term survival in triple-negative breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review was performed to identify randomized clinical trials of neoadjuvant systemic therapy for patients with clinical stage I-III triple-negative breast cancer. Data of odds ratios (ORs) for pathological complete response and hazard ratios (HRs) for event-free survival and overall survival were extracted. Disease-free survival was used as an alternative when event-free survival data were unavailable. A linear regression model on a logarithmic scale, coefficient of difference, and 95% confidential interval (CI) were calculated to assess the trial-level association between odds ratio for pathological complete response and hazard ratio for overall survival and event-free survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight trials with 2342 patients were included. Three trials tested immune checkpoint inhibitors. Coefficient of difference (R2) was 0.2 for hazard ratio of event-free survival (95% CI = 0.17 to 0.22, P = .27), and R2 for hazard ratio of overall survival was 0.19 (95% CI = 0.17 to 0.22, P = .33).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is no strong evidence to support using pathological complete response as a surrogate marker for event-free survival or overall survival in early stage triple-negative breast cancer at the trial level. Because of the necessity of minimizing drug approval delay with reliable long-term outcome, further studies of surrogate markers in early stage triple-negative breast cancer are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11932712/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting surrogacy of pathological complete response for long-term survival in triple-negative breast cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Toru Yoshino, Zao Zhang, Ryota Sato, Stanley Lipkowitz, Takeo Fujii\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jncics/pkaf022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pathological complete response has been used as a primary endpoint in neoadjuvant trials in early stage triple-negative breast cancer, and the Food and Drug Administration accepted pathological complete response as a surrogate endpoint for long-term survival outcomes in high-risk early stage breast cancer for new drug approval. However, there is insufficient trial-level data to robustly support pathological complete response as a surrogate for long-term survival in triple-negative breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review was performed to identify randomized clinical trials of neoadjuvant systemic therapy for patients with clinical stage I-III triple-negative breast cancer. Data of odds ratios (ORs) for pathological complete response and hazard ratios (HRs) for event-free survival and overall survival were extracted. Disease-free survival was used as an alternative when event-free survival data were unavailable. A linear regression model on a logarithmic scale, coefficient of difference, and 95% confidential interval (CI) were calculated to assess the trial-level association between odds ratio for pathological complete response and hazard ratio for overall survival and event-free survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight trials with 2342 patients were included. Three trials tested immune checkpoint inhibitors. Coefficient of difference (R2) was 0.2 for hazard ratio of event-free survival (95% CI = 0.17 to 0.22, P = .27), and R2 for hazard ratio of overall survival was 0.19 (95% CI = 0.17 to 0.22, P = .33).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is no strong evidence to support using pathological complete response as a surrogate marker for event-free survival or overall survival in early stage triple-negative breast cancer at the trial level. Because of the necessity of minimizing drug approval delay with reliable long-term outcome, further studies of surrogate markers in early stage triple-negative breast cancer are warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JNCI Cancer Spectrum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11932712/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JNCI Cancer Spectrum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaf022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaf022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:病理完全缓解(pCR)已被用作早期三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)新辅助试验的主要终点,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)接受pCR作为高风险早期乳腺癌长期生存结局的替代终点,以批准新药。然而,没有足够的试验水平的数据来强有力地支持pCR作为TNBC长期生存的替代品。方法:通过系统的文献综述,确定新辅助全身治疗临床I-III期TNBC患者的随机临床试验。提取pCR的优势比(ORs)、无事件生存期(EFS)和总生存期(OS)的风险比(hr)数据。当无法获得EFS数据时,将无病生存期作为替代方法。计算对数尺度线性回归模型、差异系数和95%置信区间(CI),以评估pCR的OR与OS和EFS的HR之间的试验水平相关性。结果:8项试验共纳入2,342例患者。三个试验测试了免疫检查点抑制剂。EFS的HR差异系数(R2)为0.2 (95% CI, 0.17 ~ 0.22, P = 0.27), OS的HR差异系数(R2)为0.19 (95% CI, 0.17 ~ 0.22, P = 0.33)。结论:在试验水平上,没有强有力的证据支持将pCR作为早期TNBC中EFS或OS的替代标志物。由于有必要尽量减少药物批准延迟和可靠的长期结果,因此有必要进一步研究早期TNBC的替代标记物。
Revisiting surrogacy of pathological complete response for long-term survival in triple-negative breast cancer.
Background: Pathological complete response has been used as a primary endpoint in neoadjuvant trials in early stage triple-negative breast cancer, and the Food and Drug Administration accepted pathological complete response as a surrogate endpoint for long-term survival outcomes in high-risk early stage breast cancer for new drug approval. However, there is insufficient trial-level data to robustly support pathological complete response as a surrogate for long-term survival in triple-negative breast cancer.
Methods: A systematic literature review was performed to identify randomized clinical trials of neoadjuvant systemic therapy for patients with clinical stage I-III triple-negative breast cancer. Data of odds ratios (ORs) for pathological complete response and hazard ratios (HRs) for event-free survival and overall survival were extracted. Disease-free survival was used as an alternative when event-free survival data were unavailable. A linear regression model on a logarithmic scale, coefficient of difference, and 95% confidential interval (CI) were calculated to assess the trial-level association between odds ratio for pathological complete response and hazard ratio for overall survival and event-free survival.
Results: Eight trials with 2342 patients were included. Three trials tested immune checkpoint inhibitors. Coefficient of difference (R2) was 0.2 for hazard ratio of event-free survival (95% CI = 0.17 to 0.22, P = .27), and R2 for hazard ratio of overall survival was 0.19 (95% CI = 0.17 to 0.22, P = .33).
Conclusions: There is no strong evidence to support using pathological complete response as a surrogate marker for event-free survival or overall survival in early stage triple-negative breast cancer at the trial level. Because of the necessity of minimizing drug approval delay with reliable long-term outcome, further studies of surrogate markers in early stage triple-negative breast cancer are warranted.