Sarah Glewis, Michael Michael, Howard Gurney, Ian Olver, Nicholas Zdenkowski, Stephen Ackland, Craig Kukard, Madawa Jayawardana, S Sandun M Silva, Marliese Alexander, Jeanne Tie, Peter Galettis, Jennifer H Martin
{"title":"使用治疗药物监测(PREDICT-5FU)进行 5-氟尿嘧啶治疗的可行性和人群暴露:多中心临床试验。","authors":"Sarah Glewis, Michael Michael, Howard Gurney, Ian Olver, Nicholas Zdenkowski, Stephen Ackland, Craig Kukard, Madawa Jayawardana, S Sandun M Silva, Marliese Alexander, Jeanne Tie, Peter Galettis, Jennifer H Martin","doi":"10.1002/bcp.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>PREDICT-5FU aimed to document 5-fluorouracil (5FU) exposure in a cancer population and to evaluate the feasibility of 5FU and capecitabine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in patients receiving standard doses and schedules.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multicentre, prospective, observational single-arm study. Eligible adult patients received 5FU (infusional ≥24 h) or capecitabine. Patients were treated for gastrointestinal, breast and head-and-neck cancers at four Australian hospitals. TDM was performed in consecutive cycles until target area under the curve (AUC) was reached. Pharmacogenetic testing was performed for all patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty patients (24 males, 26 females) were recruited. Median age was 63 years; common diagnoses were lower gastrointestinal cancers 40% (20/50) and metastatic disease 80% (40/50). The majority received 5FU (38/50, 76%) over 46 h. Only 36% of 5FU patients achieved target AUC when dosed based on body surface area; 61% were below and 3% above target range. Post TDM-adjusted dosing, target AUC was achieved in 58% of patients (22% absolute increase vs. BSA dosing, p = 0.03), within median three cycles (range 1-5). DPYD variant allele carriers (3/4) had upfront reduced dosing due to heterozygosity; all were below the target AUC and one experienced Grade 3 toxicity. There was no correlation between dihydrouracil: uracil ratio [UH2/U] or uracilemia [U] and DPYD genotype. TDM results were reported with an average of 4 days from sampling.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TDM dosing is feasible and increases the proportion of patients reaching target AUC. Findings are relevant across all cancers treated with 5FU, and particularly for DPYD variant allele carriers receiving upfront dose reductions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility and population exposure of 5-fluorouracil using therapeutic drug monitoring (PREDICT-5FU): A multicentre clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Glewis, Michael Michael, Howard Gurney, Ian Olver, Nicholas Zdenkowski, Stephen Ackland, Craig Kukard, Madawa Jayawardana, S Sandun M Silva, Marliese Alexander, Jeanne Tie, Peter Galettis, Jennifer H Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bcp.70006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>PREDICT-5FU aimed to document 5-fluorouracil (5FU) exposure in a cancer population and to evaluate the feasibility of 5FU and capecitabine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in patients receiving standard doses and schedules.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multicentre, prospective, observational single-arm study. Eligible adult patients received 5FU (infusional ≥24 h) or capecitabine. Patients were treated for gastrointestinal, breast and head-and-neck cancers at four Australian hospitals. TDM was performed in consecutive cycles until target area under the curve (AUC) was reached. Pharmacogenetic testing was performed for all patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty patients (24 males, 26 females) were recruited. Median age was 63 years; common diagnoses were lower gastrointestinal cancers 40% (20/50) and metastatic disease 80% (40/50). The majority received 5FU (38/50, 76%) over 46 h. Only 36% of 5FU patients achieved target AUC when dosed based on body surface area; 61% were below and 3% above target range. Post TDM-adjusted dosing, target AUC was achieved in 58% of patients (22% absolute increase vs. BSA dosing, p = 0.03), within median three cycles (range 1-5). DPYD variant allele carriers (3/4) had upfront reduced dosing due to heterozygosity; all were below the target AUC and one experienced Grade 3 toxicity. There was no correlation between dihydrouracil: uracil ratio [UH2/U] or uracilemia [U] and DPYD genotype. TDM results were reported with an average of 4 days from sampling.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TDM dosing is feasible and increases the proportion of patients reaching target AUC. Findings are relevant across all cancers treated with 5FU, and particularly for DPYD variant allele carriers receiving upfront dose reductions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70006\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Feasibility and population exposure of 5-fluorouracil using therapeutic drug monitoring (PREDICT-5FU): A multicentre clinical trial.
Aim: PREDICT-5FU aimed to document 5-fluorouracil (5FU) exposure in a cancer population and to evaluate the feasibility of 5FU and capecitabine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in patients receiving standard doses and schedules.
Methods: Multicentre, prospective, observational single-arm study. Eligible adult patients received 5FU (infusional ≥24 h) or capecitabine. Patients were treated for gastrointestinal, breast and head-and-neck cancers at four Australian hospitals. TDM was performed in consecutive cycles until target area under the curve (AUC) was reached. Pharmacogenetic testing was performed for all patients.
Results: Fifty patients (24 males, 26 females) were recruited. Median age was 63 years; common diagnoses were lower gastrointestinal cancers 40% (20/50) and metastatic disease 80% (40/50). The majority received 5FU (38/50, 76%) over 46 h. Only 36% of 5FU patients achieved target AUC when dosed based on body surface area; 61% were below and 3% above target range. Post TDM-adjusted dosing, target AUC was achieved in 58% of patients (22% absolute increase vs. BSA dosing, p = 0.03), within median three cycles (range 1-5). DPYD variant allele carriers (3/4) had upfront reduced dosing due to heterozygosity; all were below the target AUC and one experienced Grade 3 toxicity. There was no correlation between dihydrouracil: uracil ratio [UH2/U] or uracilemia [U] and DPYD genotype. TDM results were reported with an average of 4 days from sampling.
Conclusion: TDM dosing is feasible and increases the proportion of patients reaching target AUC. Findings are relevant across all cancers treated with 5FU, and particularly for DPYD variant allele carriers receiving upfront dose reductions.
期刊介绍:
Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.