能插管,不能通气:一种处理插管后通气和氧合问题的算法。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Kjetil Fosse, Magnus Salomonsen, Sven Erik Gisvold, Bjørnar Gundersen, Trond Nordseth
{"title":"能插管,不能通气:一种处理插管后通气和氧合问题的算法。","authors":"Kjetil Fosse, Magnus Salomonsen, Sven Erik Gisvold, Bjørnar Gundersen, Trond Nordseth","doi":"10.1111/aas.70007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and methods: </strong>Few guidelines address how to handle unanticipated ventilatory problems and hypoxemia in a successfully intubated patient. We will refer to this situation as \"can intubate-cannot ventilate.\" The situation may occur immediately after intubation or later during general anaesthesia. The aim of this paper is to describe an algorithm for handling this situation. In an intubated patient, the airway can be considered a continuum from the ventilator to the alveoli, and the problem is somewhere along this route: Ventilator → Hoses → Filter → Tracheal tube (TT) → Tracheae → Bronchi → Bronchioles → Alveoli. The proposed algorithm is based on clinical experience and has not been externally validated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The first critical decision to be made is whether the TT has been placed correctly in the trachea or not. Positive wave-formed capnography is the primary marker for correct intubation. Video and/or direct laryngoscopy can be used for further verification. The patient should be disconnected from the ventilator and manually ventilated with bag-valve and 100% oxygen. An open tube should then be verified by applying a suction catheter through the tube. If these measures do not improve the situation, a fibreoptic scope should be inserted to further assess possible causes of difficult ventilation. If no obvious treatable cause is detected at this point, bronchospasm, anaphylaxis, or pneumothorax should be ruled out or treated. Further handling should focus on optimizing gas exchange in the lungs and considering more advanced treatment options to improve oxygenation and circulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We have proposed an algorithm to handle unanticipated problems with ventilation and oxygenation in a patient who has been successfully intubated. Equipment failure and a blocked TT should be ruled out before diagnosing and treating medical or surgical causes of ventilatory problems.</p><p><strong>Editorial comment: </strong>This article presents a logical approach to the time-sensitive and critical situation where, for some reason, after intubation, ventilation of the lungs is not succeeding. The authors propose steps for a systematic approach, and recognition of different possible explanations for ventilation not working is informative.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":"69 3","pages":"e70007"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11848235/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can intubate, cannot ventilate: A proposed algorithm to handle problems with ventilation and oxygenation after intubation.\",\"authors\":\"Kjetil Fosse, Magnus Salomonsen, Sven Erik Gisvold, Bjørnar Gundersen, Trond Nordseth\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aas.70007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and methods: </strong>Few guidelines address how to handle unanticipated ventilatory problems and hypoxemia in a successfully intubated patient. We will refer to this situation as \\\"can intubate-cannot ventilate.\\\" The situation may occur immediately after intubation or later during general anaesthesia. The aim of this paper is to describe an algorithm for handling this situation. In an intubated patient, the airway can be considered a continuum from the ventilator to the alveoli, and the problem is somewhere along this route: Ventilator → Hoses → Filter → Tracheal tube (TT) → Tracheae → Bronchi → Bronchioles → Alveoli. The proposed algorithm is based on clinical experience and has not been externally validated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The first critical decision to be made is whether the TT has been placed correctly in the trachea or not. Positive wave-formed capnography is the primary marker for correct intubation. Video and/or direct laryngoscopy can be used for further verification. The patient should be disconnected from the ventilator and manually ventilated with bag-valve and 100% oxygen. An open tube should then be verified by applying a suction catheter through the tube. If these measures do not improve the situation, a fibreoptic scope should be inserted to further assess possible causes of difficult ventilation. If no obvious treatable cause is detected at this point, bronchospasm, anaphylaxis, or pneumothorax should be ruled out or treated. Further handling should focus on optimizing gas exchange in the lungs and considering more advanced treatment options to improve oxygenation and circulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We have proposed an algorithm to handle unanticipated problems with ventilation and oxygenation in a patient who has been successfully intubated. Equipment failure and a blocked TT should be ruled out before diagnosing and treating medical or surgical causes of ventilatory problems.</p><p><strong>Editorial comment: </strong>This article presents a logical approach to the time-sensitive and critical situation where, for some reason, after intubation, ventilation of the lungs is not succeeding. The authors propose steps for a systematic approach, and recognition of different possible explanations for ventilation not working is informative.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\"69 3\",\"pages\":\"e70007\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11848235/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70007\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和方法:很少有指南涉及如何处理成功插管患者的意外通气问题和低氧血症。我们将这种情况称为“可以插管-不能通气”。这种情况可能在插管后立即发生,也可能在全身麻醉后发生。本文的目的是描述一种处理这种情况的算法。在插管患者中,气道可被视为从呼吸机到肺泡的连续体,问题发生在这条路线上的某个地方:呼吸机→软管→过滤器→气管管(TT)→气管→支气管→细支气管→肺泡。该算法基于临床经验,尚未经过外部验证。结果:TT是否正确放置在气管内是第一个关键决策。阳性波形造影是正确插管的主要标志。视频和/或直接喉镜检查可用于进一步验证。应断开患者与呼吸机的连接,使用气囊阀和100%氧气进行人工通气。打开的导管应该通过插管进行验证。如果这些措施不能改善情况,则应插入纤维镜以进一步评估通气困难的可能原因。如果此时没有发现明显的可治疗的原因,支气管痉挛、过敏反应或气胸应排除或治疗。进一步的处理应侧重于优化肺部的气体交换,并考虑更先进的治疗方案,以改善氧合和循环。结论:我们提出了一种算法来处理气管插管成功的患者在通气和氧合方面的意外问题。在诊断和治疗通气问题的内科或外科原因之前,应排除设备故障和TT阻塞。编辑评论:这篇文章提出了一个合乎逻辑的方法,时间敏感和危急情况下,由于某种原因,插管后,肺通气不成功。作者提出了系统方法的步骤,并认识到通风不起作用的不同可能解释是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can intubate, cannot ventilate: A proposed algorithm to handle problems with ventilation and oxygenation after intubation.

Background and methods: Few guidelines address how to handle unanticipated ventilatory problems and hypoxemia in a successfully intubated patient. We will refer to this situation as "can intubate-cannot ventilate." The situation may occur immediately after intubation or later during general anaesthesia. The aim of this paper is to describe an algorithm for handling this situation. In an intubated patient, the airway can be considered a continuum from the ventilator to the alveoli, and the problem is somewhere along this route: Ventilator → Hoses → Filter → Tracheal tube (TT) → Tracheae → Bronchi → Bronchioles → Alveoli. The proposed algorithm is based on clinical experience and has not been externally validated.

Results: The first critical decision to be made is whether the TT has been placed correctly in the trachea or not. Positive wave-formed capnography is the primary marker for correct intubation. Video and/or direct laryngoscopy can be used for further verification. The patient should be disconnected from the ventilator and manually ventilated with bag-valve and 100% oxygen. An open tube should then be verified by applying a suction catheter through the tube. If these measures do not improve the situation, a fibreoptic scope should be inserted to further assess possible causes of difficult ventilation. If no obvious treatable cause is detected at this point, bronchospasm, anaphylaxis, or pneumothorax should be ruled out or treated. Further handling should focus on optimizing gas exchange in the lungs and considering more advanced treatment options to improve oxygenation and circulation.

Conclusions: We have proposed an algorithm to handle unanticipated problems with ventilation and oxygenation in a patient who has been successfully intubated. Equipment failure and a blocked TT should be ruled out before diagnosing and treating medical or surgical causes of ventilatory problems.

Editorial comment: This article presents a logical approach to the time-sensitive and critical situation where, for some reason, after intubation, ventilation of the lungs is not succeeding. The authors propose steps for a systematic approach, and recognition of different possible explanations for ventilation not working is informative.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信