基于氮的近端传感和数据融合用于管理区划定

IF 1.5 Q3 AGRONOMY
Md Tawhid Hossain, Marco Donat, Ines Astrid Tougma, Sonoko D. Bellingrath-Kimura, Kathrin Grahmann
{"title":"基于氮的近端传感和数据融合用于管理区划定","authors":"Md Tawhid Hossain,&nbsp;Marco Donat,&nbsp;Ines Astrid Tougma,&nbsp;Sonoko D. Bellingrath-Kimura,&nbsp;Kathrin Grahmann","doi":"10.1002/agg2.70051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Delineation of management zones (MZ) based on soil mineral nitrogen (SMN) dynamics can enhance site-specific management, reduce nitrate leaching, and improve nutrient efficiency. We tested proximal sensing as an alternative to standard laboratory methods to capture the spatial variability of SMN, nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>), and soil moisture (SM) and combined these data with topographic and remote sensing inputs to delineate MZ using data fusion and <i>k</i>-means clustering. Two conventionally managed fields with winter oilseed rape (<i>Brassica napus</i> L.) and winter barley (<i>Hordeum vulgare</i> L.) were chosen for Field-A and Field-B. Fresh soil samples were analyzed in the laboratory using KCl extraction, while global positioning system-labeled data from a proximal soil sensor (FarmLab) were accessed via cloud storage. FarmLab estimated NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> and SMN were higher than laboratory results (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), whereas SM showed no significant difference between the two methods. Bland–Altman analysis, which assesses the limit of agreement between methods to ensure consistency, revealed significant discrepancies in NO₃⁻ estimated by both methods, particularly in Field-B, with limits of agreement ranging from −17.40 to 29.66 mg kg<sup>−1</sup>. Results of <i>k</i>-means clustering, a method for grouping data into similar categories, were evaluated using 11 feature sets, which combine data from multiple sources (laboratory and FarmLab data, satellites, and topographic data) to create a comprehensive dataset for analysis at different time points in autumn and spring. The results showed that the optimal clustering result varied depending on the field and date. Feature sets with topographic variables performed well in Field-A, while feature sets with remote sensing, topography, and FarmLab data improved MZ in Field-B. This study demonstrates how the FarmLab device can capture within-field SMN variability and examines the similarities and differences between both methods (laboratory and FarmLab). Despite discrepancies between methods, FarmLab showed the potential of integrating in-season NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> and SMN data with topographic and remote sensing data to delineate MZ. This approach can be scaled up to farm and landscape scale, allowing farmers to leverage proximal and remote sensing data for in-season SMN monitoring, which enables efficient nutrient management and promotes sustainable farming practices with economic and environmental benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.70051","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nitrogen-based proximal sensing and data fusion for management zone delineation\",\"authors\":\"Md Tawhid Hossain,&nbsp;Marco Donat,&nbsp;Ines Astrid Tougma,&nbsp;Sonoko D. Bellingrath-Kimura,&nbsp;Kathrin Grahmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/agg2.70051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Delineation of management zones (MZ) based on soil mineral nitrogen (SMN) dynamics can enhance site-specific management, reduce nitrate leaching, and improve nutrient efficiency. We tested proximal sensing as an alternative to standard laboratory methods to capture the spatial variability of SMN, nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>), and soil moisture (SM) and combined these data with topographic and remote sensing inputs to delineate MZ using data fusion and <i>k</i>-means clustering. Two conventionally managed fields with winter oilseed rape (<i>Brassica napus</i> L.) and winter barley (<i>Hordeum vulgare</i> L.) were chosen for Field-A and Field-B. Fresh soil samples were analyzed in the laboratory using KCl extraction, while global positioning system-labeled data from a proximal soil sensor (FarmLab) were accessed via cloud storage. FarmLab estimated NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> and SMN were higher than laboratory results (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), whereas SM showed no significant difference between the two methods. Bland–Altman analysis, which assesses the limit of agreement between methods to ensure consistency, revealed significant discrepancies in NO₃⁻ estimated by both methods, particularly in Field-B, with limits of agreement ranging from −17.40 to 29.66 mg kg<sup>−1</sup>. Results of <i>k</i>-means clustering, a method for grouping data into similar categories, were evaluated using 11 feature sets, which combine data from multiple sources (laboratory and FarmLab data, satellites, and topographic data) to create a comprehensive dataset for analysis at different time points in autumn and spring. The results showed that the optimal clustering result varied depending on the field and date. Feature sets with topographic variables performed well in Field-A, while feature sets with remote sensing, topography, and FarmLab data improved MZ in Field-B. This study demonstrates how the FarmLab device can capture within-field SMN variability and examines the similarities and differences between both methods (laboratory and FarmLab). Despite discrepancies between methods, FarmLab showed the potential of integrating in-season NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> and SMN data with topographic and remote sensing data to delineate MZ. This approach can be scaled up to farm and landscape scale, allowing farmers to leverage proximal and remote sensing data for in-season SMN monitoring, which enables efficient nutrient management and promotes sustainable farming practices with economic and environmental benefits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.70051\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agg2.70051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agg2.70051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于土壤矿质氮(SMN)动态的管理区(MZ)划定可以加强场地管理,减少硝态氮淋失,提高养分效率。我们测试了近端遥感作为标准实验室方法的替代方案,以捕获SMN、硝态氮(NO3−)和土壤湿度(SM)的空间变异性,并将这些数据与地形和遥感输入相结合,使用数据融合和k-means聚类来描绘MZ。a区和b区采用常规管理方式,分别种植冬季油菜(Brassica napus L.)和冬季大麦(Hordeum vulgare L.)。新鲜土壤样本在实验室中使用KCl提取进行分析,而来自近端土壤传感器(FarmLab)的全球定位系统标记数据通过云存储访问。FarmLab估计的NO3 -和SMN高于实验室结果(p <;0.05),而SM在两种方法间无显著差异。Bland-Altman分析评估了两种方法之间的一致性限制,揭示了两种方法估计的NO₃⁻的显著差异,特别是在b区,一致性的限制范围从- 17.40到29.66 mg kg - 1。k-means聚类(一种将数据分组到相似类别的方法)的结果使用11个特征集进行评估,这些特征集结合了来自多个来源的数据(实验室和FarmLab数据、卫星和地形数据),创建了一个综合数据集,用于在秋季和春季的不同时间点进行分析。结果表明,最佳聚类结果随场地和日期的不同而不同。具有地形变量的特征集在Field-A中表现良好,而具有遥感、地形和FarmLab数据的特征集提高了Field-B的MZ。本研究展示了FarmLab设备如何捕获场内SMN变异性,并检查了两种方法(实验室和FarmLab)之间的异同。尽管方法之间存在差异,但FarmLab表明,将季节NO3−和SMN数据与地形和遥感数据相结合,可以划定MZ。这种方法可以扩大到农场和景观规模,使农民能够利用近端和遥感数据进行季节性SMN监测,从而实现有效的养分管理,并促进具有经济和环境效益的可持续农业实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Nitrogen-based proximal sensing and data fusion for management zone delineation

Nitrogen-based proximal sensing and data fusion for management zone delineation

Nitrogen-based proximal sensing and data fusion for management zone delineation

Nitrogen-based proximal sensing and data fusion for management zone delineation

Nitrogen-based proximal sensing and data fusion for management zone delineation

Delineation of management zones (MZ) based on soil mineral nitrogen (SMN) dynamics can enhance site-specific management, reduce nitrate leaching, and improve nutrient efficiency. We tested proximal sensing as an alternative to standard laboratory methods to capture the spatial variability of SMN, nitrate (NO3), and soil moisture (SM) and combined these data with topographic and remote sensing inputs to delineate MZ using data fusion and k-means clustering. Two conventionally managed fields with winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) and winter barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) were chosen for Field-A and Field-B. Fresh soil samples were analyzed in the laboratory using KCl extraction, while global positioning system-labeled data from a proximal soil sensor (FarmLab) were accessed via cloud storage. FarmLab estimated NO3 and SMN were higher than laboratory results (p < 0.05), whereas SM showed no significant difference between the two methods. Bland–Altman analysis, which assesses the limit of agreement between methods to ensure consistency, revealed significant discrepancies in NO₃⁻ estimated by both methods, particularly in Field-B, with limits of agreement ranging from −17.40 to 29.66 mg kg−1. Results of k-means clustering, a method for grouping data into similar categories, were evaluated using 11 feature sets, which combine data from multiple sources (laboratory and FarmLab data, satellites, and topographic data) to create a comprehensive dataset for analysis at different time points in autumn and spring. The results showed that the optimal clustering result varied depending on the field and date. Feature sets with topographic variables performed well in Field-A, while feature sets with remote sensing, topography, and FarmLab data improved MZ in Field-B. This study demonstrates how the FarmLab device can capture within-field SMN variability and examines the similarities and differences between both methods (laboratory and FarmLab). Despite discrepancies between methods, FarmLab showed the potential of integrating in-season NO3 and SMN data with topographic and remote sensing data to delineate MZ. This approach can be scaled up to farm and landscape scale, allowing farmers to leverage proximal and remote sensing data for in-season SMN monitoring, which enables efficient nutrient management and promotes sustainable farming practices with economic and environmental benefits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信