支持亲近的人增加情感风险感知:纵向和实验研究。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Journal of Behavioral Medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-22 DOI:10.1007/s10865-025-00552-3
Molly Gonenne, Rebecca A Ferrer, Tristen K Inagaki
{"title":"支持亲近的人增加情感风险感知:纵向和实验研究。","authors":"Molly Gonenne, Rebecca A Ferrer, Tristen K Inagaki","doi":"10.1007/s10865-025-00552-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Risk perceptions are instrumental in predicting how people will process and react to threats. While social contexts have long been associated with changes in risk perception, whether and which social contexts alter risk perceptions is not well understood. This paper explores one such social context--support-giving--which has previous links to affect, cognition, and behavior, including how threats are processed. Using a tripartite model in which risk perceptions are split between deliberative (logical), affective (emotional), and experiential (lived) assessments, we used two studies, a longitudinal-correlational (Study 1) and experimental (Study 2), to explore whether support-giving relates to and impacts risk perceptions. Findings from Study 1 revealed that support-giving toward a close other at Time 1 was associated with an increase in affective risk perceptions at Time 2. Study 2 clarified the direction of this association, finding that there was an increase in affective and experiential risk perceptions for those randomly assigned to a support-giving condition, as compared to the control. Deliberative risk perceptions did not differ between conditions. Given that affective risk perceptions strongly predict behavior, support-giving may be a promising new avenue by which to inspire preventative behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":48329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"488-499"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Giving support to close others increases affective risk perceptions: longitudinal and experimental studies.\",\"authors\":\"Molly Gonenne, Rebecca A Ferrer, Tristen K Inagaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10865-025-00552-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Risk perceptions are instrumental in predicting how people will process and react to threats. While social contexts have long been associated with changes in risk perception, whether and which social contexts alter risk perceptions is not well understood. This paper explores one such social context--support-giving--which has previous links to affect, cognition, and behavior, including how threats are processed. Using a tripartite model in which risk perceptions are split between deliberative (logical), affective (emotional), and experiential (lived) assessments, we used two studies, a longitudinal-correlational (Study 1) and experimental (Study 2), to explore whether support-giving relates to and impacts risk perceptions. Findings from Study 1 revealed that support-giving toward a close other at Time 1 was associated with an increase in affective risk perceptions at Time 2. Study 2 clarified the direction of this association, finding that there was an increase in affective and experiential risk perceptions for those randomly assigned to a support-giving condition, as compared to the control. Deliberative risk perceptions did not differ between conditions. Given that affective risk perceptions strongly predict behavior, support-giving may be a promising new avenue by which to inspire preventative behavior.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavioral Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"488-499\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavioral Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-025-00552-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-025-00552-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

风险感知在预测人们将如何处理和应对威胁方面起着重要作用。虽然社会环境长期以来与风险感知的变化有关,但社会环境是否以及哪些社会环境会改变风险感知尚未得到很好的理解。本文探讨了一种这样的社会背景——给予支持——它与情感、认知和行为(包括如何处理威胁)有先前的联系。使用三方模型,其中风险感知分为审议(逻辑),情感(情感)和经验(生活)评估,我们使用了两项研究,纵向相关(研究1)和实验(研究2),以探索支持是否与风险感知相关并影响风险感知。研究1的发现表明,在时间1时给予亲密的人支持与时间2时情感风险感知的增加有关。研究2澄清了这种关联的方向,发现与对照组相比,被随机分配到给予支持条件的人在情感和经验上的风险感知都有所增加。审慎的风险感知在不同条件下没有差异。考虑到情感风险感知强烈地预测行为,给予支持可能是激发预防行为的一个有希望的新途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Giving support to close others increases affective risk perceptions: longitudinal and experimental studies.

Risk perceptions are instrumental in predicting how people will process and react to threats. While social contexts have long been associated with changes in risk perception, whether and which social contexts alter risk perceptions is not well understood. This paper explores one such social context--support-giving--which has previous links to affect, cognition, and behavior, including how threats are processed. Using a tripartite model in which risk perceptions are split between deliberative (logical), affective (emotional), and experiential (lived) assessments, we used two studies, a longitudinal-correlational (Study 1) and experimental (Study 2), to explore whether support-giving relates to and impacts risk perceptions. Findings from Study 1 revealed that support-giving toward a close other at Time 1 was associated with an increase in affective risk perceptions at Time 2. Study 2 clarified the direction of this association, finding that there was an increase in affective and experiential risk perceptions for those randomly assigned to a support-giving condition, as compared to the control. Deliberative risk perceptions did not differ between conditions. Given that affective risk perceptions strongly predict behavior, support-giving may be a promising new avenue by which to inspire preventative behavior.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Journal of Behavioral Medicine PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: The Journal of Behavioral Medicine is a broadly conceived interdisciplinary publication devoted to furthering understanding of physical health and illness through the knowledge, methods, and techniques of behavioral science. A significant function of the journal is the application of this knowledge to prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation and to the promotion of health at the individual, community, and population levels.The content of the journal spans all areas of basic and applied behavioral medicine research, conducted in and informed by all related disciplines including but not limited to: psychology, medicine, the public health sciences, sociology, anthropology, health economics, nursing, and biostatistics. Topics welcomed include but are not limited to: prevention of disease and health promotion; the effects of psychological stress on physical and psychological functioning; sociocultural influences on health and illness; adherence to medical regimens; the study of health related behaviors including tobacco use, substance use, sexual behavior, physical activity, and obesity; health services research; and behavioral factors in the prevention and treatment of somatic disorders.  Reports of interdisciplinary approaches to research are particularly welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信