左室射血分数降低的慢性全闭塞患者逆行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一项单中心回顾性队列研究

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Song Wen, Chang Dai, Zehan Huang, Jing Wang, Feng Wang, Kaize Wu, Dunliang Ma, Feihuang Han, Jiquan Xiao, Yuqing Huang, Shulin Wu, Bin Zhang
{"title":"左室射血分数降低的慢性全闭塞患者逆行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一项单中心回顾性队列研究","authors":"Song Wen, Chang Dai, Zehan Huang, Jing Wang, Feng Wang, Kaize Wu, Dunliang Ma, Feihuang Han, Jiquan Xiao, Yuqing Huang, Shulin Wu, Bin Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s00380-025-02526-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data on the safety and prognostic implications of retrograde percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and chronic total occlusion (CTO) are unclear. This study aimed to assess the procedural results and long-term outcomes of retrograde CTO PCI in individuals with reduced LVEF (≤ 40%).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 836 consecutive patients who underwent elective retrograde CTO PCI at a single center between January 2011 and April 2023. Patients and lesion characteristics, procedural details and results, and long-term outcomes were compared between patients with reduced (LVEF ≤ 40%) and preserved left ventricular systolic function (LVEF > 40%) based on echocardiographic assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline LVEF ≤ 40% was presented in 156 (18.7%) patients. The collateral channel (CC) tracking success was high (overall 93.5%) and similar among the groups (94.2% vs. 93.4%, p = 0.835), as well as retrograde technical success (87.8% vs. 89.9%, p = 0.548) and recanalization success (87.8% vs. 91.5%, p = 0.281). Procedure complications were low and similar between the groups (all p > 0.05). Clinical follow-up was available in 767 (91.2%) patients with a medium follow-up of 1041 (531-1511) days. In patients with lower LVEF, the incidence of MACE was higher (23.2% vs. 14.9%, p = 0.021), mainly the all-cause mortality (15.4% vs. 4.1%, p < 0.001) and cardiac death (12.2% vs. 2.5%, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed that age (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.04, p = 0.008), LVEF ≤ 40% (HR: 1.21, 95%CI: 1.01-1.45, p = 0.039), and revascularization success (HR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.22-0.66, p < 0.001) were independently associated with MACE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Retrograde PCI may represent a safe and efficient management strategy for patients with reduced LVEF and CTO. Furthermore, our study demonstrated that successful CTO recanalization was associated with a significant survival benefit, regardless of left ventricular systolic function.</p>","PeriodicalId":12940,"journal":{"name":"Heart and Vessels","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrograde percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusions in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: a single-center retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Song Wen, Chang Dai, Zehan Huang, Jing Wang, Feng Wang, Kaize Wu, Dunliang Ma, Feihuang Han, Jiquan Xiao, Yuqing Huang, Shulin Wu, Bin Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00380-025-02526-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data on the safety and prognostic implications of retrograde percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and chronic total occlusion (CTO) are unclear. This study aimed to assess the procedural results and long-term outcomes of retrograde CTO PCI in individuals with reduced LVEF (≤ 40%).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 836 consecutive patients who underwent elective retrograde CTO PCI at a single center between January 2011 and April 2023. Patients and lesion characteristics, procedural details and results, and long-term outcomes were compared between patients with reduced (LVEF ≤ 40%) and preserved left ventricular systolic function (LVEF > 40%) based on echocardiographic assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline LVEF ≤ 40% was presented in 156 (18.7%) patients. The collateral channel (CC) tracking success was high (overall 93.5%) and similar among the groups (94.2% vs. 93.4%, p = 0.835), as well as retrograde technical success (87.8% vs. 89.9%, p = 0.548) and recanalization success (87.8% vs. 91.5%, p = 0.281). Procedure complications were low and similar between the groups (all p > 0.05). Clinical follow-up was available in 767 (91.2%) patients with a medium follow-up of 1041 (531-1511) days. In patients with lower LVEF, the incidence of MACE was higher (23.2% vs. 14.9%, p = 0.021), mainly the all-cause mortality (15.4% vs. 4.1%, p < 0.001) and cardiac death (12.2% vs. 2.5%, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed that age (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.04, p = 0.008), LVEF ≤ 40% (HR: 1.21, 95%CI: 1.01-1.45, p = 0.039), and revascularization success (HR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.22-0.66, p < 0.001) were independently associated with MACE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Retrograde PCI may represent a safe and efficient management strategy for patients with reduced LVEF and CTO. Furthermore, our study demonstrated that successful CTO recanalization was associated with a significant survival benefit, regardless of left ventricular systolic function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart and Vessels\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart and Vessels\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-025-02526-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart and Vessels","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-025-02526-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于低左室射血分数(LVEF)和慢性全闭塞(CTO)患者逆行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的安全性和预后意义的数据尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估LVEF降低(≤40%)患者行逆行CTO PCI的手术结果和长期预后。方法:我们对2011年1月至2023年4月在同一中心连续接受选择性逆行CTO PCI的836例患者进行了回顾性分析。比较超声心动图评价的左室收缩功能降低(LVEF≤40%)和左室收缩功能保持(LVEF > 40%)患者及病变特征、手术细节和结果及长期预后。结果:156例(18.7%)患者基线LVEF≤40%。侧支通道(CC)跟踪成功率高(总体为93.5%),各组间相似(94.2%对93.4%,p = 0.835),以及逆行技术成功率(87.8%对89.9%,p = 0.548)和再通成功率(87.8%对91.5%,p = 0.281)。两组手术并发症发生率低且相似(p < 0.05)。临床随访767例(91.2%)患者,中期随访1041(531-1511)天。在LVEF较低的患者中,MACE的发生率较高(23.2% vs. 14.9%, p = 0.021),主要是全因死亡率(15.4% vs. 4.1%), p结论:对于LVEF降低和CTO患者,逆行PCI可能是一种安全有效的治疗策略。此外,我们的研究表明,无论左心室收缩功能如何,成功的CTO再通与显著的生存益处相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retrograde percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusions in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

Background: Data on the safety and prognostic implications of retrograde percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and chronic total occlusion (CTO) are unclear. This study aimed to assess the procedural results and long-term outcomes of retrograde CTO PCI in individuals with reduced LVEF (≤ 40%).

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 836 consecutive patients who underwent elective retrograde CTO PCI at a single center between January 2011 and April 2023. Patients and lesion characteristics, procedural details and results, and long-term outcomes were compared between patients with reduced (LVEF ≤ 40%) and preserved left ventricular systolic function (LVEF > 40%) based on echocardiographic assessment.

Results: Baseline LVEF ≤ 40% was presented in 156 (18.7%) patients. The collateral channel (CC) tracking success was high (overall 93.5%) and similar among the groups (94.2% vs. 93.4%, p = 0.835), as well as retrograde technical success (87.8% vs. 89.9%, p = 0.548) and recanalization success (87.8% vs. 91.5%, p = 0.281). Procedure complications were low and similar between the groups (all p > 0.05). Clinical follow-up was available in 767 (91.2%) patients with a medium follow-up of 1041 (531-1511) days. In patients with lower LVEF, the incidence of MACE was higher (23.2% vs. 14.9%, p = 0.021), mainly the all-cause mortality (15.4% vs. 4.1%, p < 0.001) and cardiac death (12.2% vs. 2.5%, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed that age (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.04, p = 0.008), LVEF ≤ 40% (HR: 1.21, 95%CI: 1.01-1.45, p = 0.039), and revascularization success (HR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.22-0.66, p < 0.001) were independently associated with MACE.

Conclusions: Retrograde PCI may represent a safe and efficient management strategy for patients with reduced LVEF and CTO. Furthermore, our study demonstrated that successful CTO recanalization was associated with a significant survival benefit, regardless of left ventricular systolic function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart and Vessels
Heart and Vessels 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
211
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Heart and Vessels is an English-language journal that provides a forum of original ideas, excellent methods, and fascinating techniques on cardiovascular disease fields. All papers submitted for publication are evaluated only with regard to scientific quality and relevance to the heart and vessels. Contributions from those engaged in practical medicine, as well as from those involved in basic research, are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信