一次和多次剖宫产术后疼痛严重程度的比较:一项前瞻性队列研究。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Zemedkun Getahun, Mebratu Kebede, Mebratu Tilla, Gedion Asnak, Margherita Iuzzolino, Alemu Urmale, Hailemariam Getachew, Abebayehu Zemedkun, Tsegaye Demeke, Milion Abdi, Ashagire Sintayehu, Getahun Dendir
{"title":"一次和多次剖宫产术后疼痛严重程度的比较:一项前瞻性队列研究。","authors":"Zemedkun Getahun, Mebratu Kebede, Mebratu Tilla, Gedion Asnak, Margherita Iuzzolino, Alemu Urmale, Hailemariam Getachew, Abebayehu Zemedkun, Tsegaye Demeke, Milion Abdi, Ashagire Sintayehu, Getahun Dendir","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-02951-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The cesarean section was associated with moderate to severe postoperative pain. Uncertain differences exist between parturient who undergo a primary cesarean section and a repeat cesarean section in terms of post-operative pain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the degree of postoperative pain in patients who had primary and repeat cesarean sections.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An institutional-based prospective cohort study was conducted on 336 patients who fulfilled eligibility criteria and underwent caesarian section under spinal anesthesia. Study participants were selected by a systematic random sampling technique. An independent sample t test and a Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare symmetric and asymmetric data, respectively. Time to first analgesic request was analyzed using log rank Kaplan-Meier survival curves and cox-regression for covariates. Comparisons of categorical variables between groups were done using the chi-square test. The significance was determined at a P value of < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a high Risk of moderate to severe postoperative pain in repeated caesarean section compared to primary caesarean section in both incisional pain (RR, 1.364[95% CI, 1.12-1.66], p = 0.002) and visceral pain (RR, 1.66[95% CI, 1.40-1.66], p = 0.001). In comparison to the primiparas, parturient with repeated cesarean sections had highest post-operative pain severity in NRS with median NRS of 5(IQR, 3-5) at the 4th hour (p < 0.001) for the incisional pain and 6(IQR, 5-7) at the 8th hour for visceral pain, respectively, for the repeated group. The primiparas group had a longer median time to first rescue analgesic administration (median [minute], 875.7[95% CI, 750.3-1001]; P < 0.001)) than the repeated group (median [minute], 534.8 [95% CI, 426.8-642.8]; P < 0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to primary CS, repeated cesarean had a high incidence of moderate to severe postoperative pain, both visceral and incisional; within 48-h. In future endeavors of crafting postoperative analgesic plans, it is imperative to take into account individual variations and distinctions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"97"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846434/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of postoperative pain severity between primary and repeated cesarean section: a prospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Zemedkun Getahun, Mebratu Kebede, Mebratu Tilla, Gedion Asnak, Margherita Iuzzolino, Alemu Urmale, Hailemariam Getachew, Abebayehu Zemedkun, Tsegaye Demeke, Milion Abdi, Ashagire Sintayehu, Getahun Dendir\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12871-025-02951-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The cesarean section was associated with moderate to severe postoperative pain. Uncertain differences exist between parturient who undergo a primary cesarean section and a repeat cesarean section in terms of post-operative pain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the degree of postoperative pain in patients who had primary and repeat cesarean sections.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An institutional-based prospective cohort study was conducted on 336 patients who fulfilled eligibility criteria and underwent caesarian section under spinal anesthesia. Study participants were selected by a systematic random sampling technique. An independent sample t test and a Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare symmetric and asymmetric data, respectively. Time to first analgesic request was analyzed using log rank Kaplan-Meier survival curves and cox-regression for covariates. Comparisons of categorical variables between groups were done using the chi-square test. The significance was determined at a P value of < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a high Risk of moderate to severe postoperative pain in repeated caesarean section compared to primary caesarean section in both incisional pain (RR, 1.364[95% CI, 1.12-1.66], p = 0.002) and visceral pain (RR, 1.66[95% CI, 1.40-1.66], p = 0.001). In comparison to the primiparas, parturient with repeated cesarean sections had highest post-operative pain severity in NRS with median NRS of 5(IQR, 3-5) at the 4th hour (p < 0.001) for the incisional pain and 6(IQR, 5-7) at the 8th hour for visceral pain, respectively, for the repeated group. The primiparas group had a longer median time to first rescue analgesic administration (median [minute], 875.7[95% CI, 750.3-1001]; P < 0.001)) than the repeated group (median [minute], 534.8 [95% CI, 426.8-642.8]; P < 0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to primary CS, repeated cesarean had a high incidence of moderate to severe postoperative pain, both visceral and incisional; within 48-h. In future endeavors of crafting postoperative analgesic plans, it is imperative to take into account individual variations and distinctions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846434/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-02951-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-02951-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:剖宫产术与中度至重度术后疼痛相关。初次剖宫产和再次剖宫产在术后疼痛方面存在不确定的差异。目的:比较初次剖宫产与再次剖宫产患者术后疼痛程度。方法:对336例符合条件并在脊髓麻醉下剖宫产的患者进行前瞻性队列研究。研究对象采用系统随机抽样方法进行选择。分别采用独立样本t检验和Mann-Whitney U检验比较对称和非对称数据。使用对数阶Kaplan-Meier生存曲线和协变量的cox回归分析首次镇痛要求的时间。组间分类变量比较采用卡方检验。结果:在切口疼痛(RR, 1.364[95% CI, 1.12-1.66], P = 0.002)和内脏疼痛(RR, 1.66[95% CI, 1.40-1.66], P = 0.001)方面,重复剖宫产术后出现中度至重度疼痛的风险均高于首次剖宫产。与初产妇相比,重复剖宫产的产妇术后疼痛严重程度最高,第4小时的中位NRS为5(IQR, 3-5) (p)。结论:与初次剖宫产相比,重复剖宫产术后内脏和切口的中至重度疼痛发生率较高;在48小时之内。在未来制定术后镇痛计划的努力中,必须考虑到个体的差异和区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of postoperative pain severity between primary and repeated cesarean section: a prospective cohort study.

Background: The cesarean section was associated with moderate to severe postoperative pain. Uncertain differences exist between parturient who undergo a primary cesarean section and a repeat cesarean section in terms of post-operative pain.

Objective: To compare the degree of postoperative pain in patients who had primary and repeat cesarean sections.

Method: An institutional-based prospective cohort study was conducted on 336 patients who fulfilled eligibility criteria and underwent caesarian section under spinal anesthesia. Study participants were selected by a systematic random sampling technique. An independent sample t test and a Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare symmetric and asymmetric data, respectively. Time to first analgesic request was analyzed using log rank Kaplan-Meier survival curves and cox-regression for covariates. Comparisons of categorical variables between groups were done using the chi-square test. The significance was determined at a P value of < 0.05.

Results: There was a high Risk of moderate to severe postoperative pain in repeated caesarean section compared to primary caesarean section in both incisional pain (RR, 1.364[95% CI, 1.12-1.66], p = 0.002) and visceral pain (RR, 1.66[95% CI, 1.40-1.66], p = 0.001). In comparison to the primiparas, parturient with repeated cesarean sections had highest post-operative pain severity in NRS with median NRS of 5(IQR, 3-5) at the 4th hour (p < 0.001) for the incisional pain and 6(IQR, 5-7) at the 8th hour for visceral pain, respectively, for the repeated group. The primiparas group had a longer median time to first rescue analgesic administration (median [minute], 875.7[95% CI, 750.3-1001]; P < 0.001)) than the repeated group (median [minute], 534.8 [95% CI, 426.8-642.8]; P < 0.001.

Conclusions: Compared to primary CS, repeated cesarean had a high incidence of moderate to severe postoperative pain, both visceral and incisional; within 48-h. In future endeavors of crafting postoperative analgesic plans, it is imperative to take into account individual variations and distinctions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信