最显著的改变:疗养院预测绩效评估

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Yvonne Wells, Jo-Anne Rayner, Deirdre Fetherstonhaugh, Linda McAuliffe
{"title":"最显著的改变:疗养院预测绩效评估","authors":"Yvonne Wells,&nbsp;Jo-Anne Rayner,&nbsp;Deirdre Fetherstonhaugh,&nbsp;Linda McAuliffe","doi":"10.1111/jep.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Rationale</h3>\n \n <p>Due to their frailty, older people living in nursing homes are at risk of harm if the care provided is not evidence-based and high quality. The performance measures routinely collected to measure quality care in public sector nursing homes in Victoria, Australia, are currently acute care focused and collected ‘after the fact’, so there is a need for predictive performance measures that identify circumstances that reflect poor-quality care that will cause harm to residents.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims and Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the readiness of public sector nursing homes in Victoria, Australia to introduce predictive performance measures in aged care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A qualitative descriptive design was used to evaluate the introduction of eight predictive performance measures in six geographically diverse public sector nursing homes in Victoria, Australia. After implementing the performance measures interviews with staff were undertaken which were used to create 18 most significant change stories. The stories were workshopped by key stakeholders, to detect subtle changes in nursing home staff behaviours and clinical practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In the workshop, using the most significant change methodology six themes from the stories, each with sub-themes were identified which reflect the preparedness of nursing homes for the introduction of predictive performance measures, revealing ‘gaps’ in aged care practice, and the need for improvements. These included <i>staff-identified strategies</i>, <i>changes in practice</i>, <i>gaps in aged care practice</i>, <i>areas for improvement</i>, and <i>the need for improvement plans</i>, which prompted changes in staff behaviours and better care for residents.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The study highlights the value and adaptability of using the most significant change methodology to evaluate complex interventions. This method enriches analysis by emphasising individual experiences, and the dynamics of organisational change. It highlighted subtle changes in aged care practice that would have been difficult to measure including staff behaviour, organisational culture, and the role of leadership in improving care quality for residents.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Most Significant Change: An Evaluation of Predictive Performance Measures in Nursing Homes\",\"authors\":\"Yvonne Wells,&nbsp;Jo-Anne Rayner,&nbsp;Deirdre Fetherstonhaugh,&nbsp;Linda McAuliffe\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jep.70017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Rationale</h3>\\n \\n <p>Due to their frailty, older people living in nursing homes are at risk of harm if the care provided is not evidence-based and high quality. The performance measures routinely collected to measure quality care in public sector nursing homes in Victoria, Australia, are currently acute care focused and collected ‘after the fact’, so there is a need for predictive performance measures that identify circumstances that reflect poor-quality care that will cause harm to residents.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims and Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>To evaluate the readiness of public sector nursing homes in Victoria, Australia to introduce predictive performance measures in aged care.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A qualitative descriptive design was used to evaluate the introduction of eight predictive performance measures in six geographically diverse public sector nursing homes in Victoria, Australia. After implementing the performance measures interviews with staff were undertaken which were used to create 18 most significant change stories. The stories were workshopped by key stakeholders, to detect subtle changes in nursing home staff behaviours and clinical practice.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In the workshop, using the most significant change methodology six themes from the stories, each with sub-themes were identified which reflect the preparedness of nursing homes for the introduction of predictive performance measures, revealing ‘gaps’ in aged care practice, and the need for improvements. These included <i>staff-identified strategies</i>, <i>changes in practice</i>, <i>gaps in aged care practice</i>, <i>areas for improvement</i>, and <i>the need for improvement plans</i>, which prompted changes in staff behaviours and better care for residents.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study highlights the value and adaptability of using the most significant change methodology to evaluate complex interventions. This method enriches analysis by emphasising individual experiences, and the dynamics of organisational change. It highlighted subtle changes in aged care practice that would have been difficult to measure including staff behaviour, organisational culture, and the role of leadership in improving care quality for residents.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70017\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由:由于老年人身体虚弱,如果养老院提供的护理不是基于证据和高质量的,他们就有受到伤害的风险。在澳大利亚维多利亚州的公共部门养老院中,常规收集的绩效指标用于衡量护理质量,目前以急症护理为重点,并在“事后”收集,因此需要预测性绩效指标来识别反映低质量护理会对居民造成伤害的情况。目的和目标评估维多利亚州公共部门养老院的准备情况,澳大利亚在老年护理中引入预测性绩效措施。方法采用定性描述性设计来评估澳大利亚维多利亚州六个地理位置不同的公共部门养老院引入的八项预测性绩效措施。在实施绩效衡量标准后,对工作人员进行了访谈,用于创建18个最重要的变化故事。这些故事由主要利益相关者制作,以检测养老院工作人员行为和临床实践的细微变化。在研讨会上,使用最重要的变化方法,从故事中确定了六个主题,每个主题都有子主题,这些主题反映了养老院为引入预测性绩效指标所做的准备,揭示了老年护理实践中的“差距”,以及改进的需要。这些包括工作人员确定的策略,实践中的变化,老年护理实践中的差距,改进的领域,以及改进计划的需求,这促使工作人员行为的变化和对居民的更好照顾。结论本研究强调了采用最显著变化方法评价复杂干预措施的价值和适应性。这种方法通过强调个人经验和组织变化的动态来丰富分析。它强调了老年护理实践中难以衡量的微妙变化,包括员工行为、组织文化和领导在提高居民护理质量方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Most Significant Change: An Evaluation of Predictive Performance Measures in Nursing Homes

Rationale

Due to their frailty, older people living in nursing homes are at risk of harm if the care provided is not evidence-based and high quality. The performance measures routinely collected to measure quality care in public sector nursing homes in Victoria, Australia, are currently acute care focused and collected ‘after the fact’, so there is a need for predictive performance measures that identify circumstances that reflect poor-quality care that will cause harm to residents.

Aims and Objectives

To evaluate the readiness of public sector nursing homes in Victoria, Australia to introduce predictive performance measures in aged care.

Methods

A qualitative descriptive design was used to evaluate the introduction of eight predictive performance measures in six geographically diverse public sector nursing homes in Victoria, Australia. After implementing the performance measures interviews with staff were undertaken which were used to create 18 most significant change stories. The stories were workshopped by key stakeholders, to detect subtle changes in nursing home staff behaviours and clinical practice.

Results

In the workshop, using the most significant change methodology six themes from the stories, each with sub-themes were identified which reflect the preparedness of nursing homes for the introduction of predictive performance measures, revealing ‘gaps’ in aged care practice, and the need for improvements. These included staff-identified strategies, changes in practice, gaps in aged care practice, areas for improvement, and the need for improvement plans, which prompted changes in staff behaviours and better care for residents.

Conclusions

The study highlights the value and adaptability of using the most significant change methodology to evaluate complex interventions. This method enriches analysis by emphasising individual experiences, and the dynamics of organisational change. It highlighted subtle changes in aged care practice that would have been difficult to measure including staff behaviour, organisational culture, and the role of leadership in improving care quality for residents.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信