Yvonne Wells, Jo-Anne Rayner, Deirdre Fetherstonhaugh, Linda McAuliffe
{"title":"最显著的改变:疗养院预测绩效评估","authors":"Yvonne Wells, Jo-Anne Rayner, Deirdre Fetherstonhaugh, Linda McAuliffe","doi":"10.1111/jep.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Rationale</h3>\n \n <p>Due to their frailty, older people living in nursing homes are at risk of harm if the care provided is not evidence-based and high quality. The performance measures routinely collected to measure quality care in public sector nursing homes in Victoria, Australia, are currently acute care focused and collected ‘after the fact’, so there is a need for predictive performance measures that identify circumstances that reflect poor-quality care that will cause harm to residents.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims and Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the readiness of public sector nursing homes in Victoria, Australia to introduce predictive performance measures in aged care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A qualitative descriptive design was used to evaluate the introduction of eight predictive performance measures in six geographically diverse public sector nursing homes in Victoria, Australia. After implementing the performance measures interviews with staff were undertaken which were used to create 18 most significant change stories. The stories were workshopped by key stakeholders, to detect subtle changes in nursing home staff behaviours and clinical practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In the workshop, using the most significant change methodology six themes from the stories, each with sub-themes were identified which reflect the preparedness of nursing homes for the introduction of predictive performance measures, revealing ‘gaps’ in aged care practice, and the need for improvements. These included <i>staff-identified strategies</i>, <i>changes in practice</i>, <i>gaps in aged care practice</i>, <i>areas for improvement</i>, and <i>the need for improvement plans</i>, which prompted changes in staff behaviours and better care for residents.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The study highlights the value and adaptability of using the most significant change methodology to evaluate complex interventions. This method enriches analysis by emphasising individual experiences, and the dynamics of organisational change. It highlighted subtle changes in aged care practice that would have been difficult to measure including staff behaviour, organisational culture, and the role of leadership in improving care quality for residents.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Most Significant Change: An Evaluation of Predictive Performance Measures in Nursing Homes\",\"authors\":\"Yvonne Wells, Jo-Anne Rayner, Deirdre Fetherstonhaugh, Linda McAuliffe\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jep.70017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Rationale</h3>\\n \\n <p>Due to their frailty, older people living in nursing homes are at risk of harm if the care provided is not evidence-based and high quality. The performance measures routinely collected to measure quality care in public sector nursing homes in Victoria, Australia, are currently acute care focused and collected ‘after the fact’, so there is a need for predictive performance measures that identify circumstances that reflect poor-quality care that will cause harm to residents.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims and Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>To evaluate the readiness of public sector nursing homes in Victoria, Australia to introduce predictive performance measures in aged care.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A qualitative descriptive design was used to evaluate the introduction of eight predictive performance measures in six geographically diverse public sector nursing homes in Victoria, Australia. After implementing the performance measures interviews with staff were undertaken which were used to create 18 most significant change stories. The stories were workshopped by key stakeholders, to detect subtle changes in nursing home staff behaviours and clinical practice.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In the workshop, using the most significant change methodology six themes from the stories, each with sub-themes were identified which reflect the preparedness of nursing homes for the introduction of predictive performance measures, revealing ‘gaps’ in aged care practice, and the need for improvements. These included <i>staff-identified strategies</i>, <i>changes in practice</i>, <i>gaps in aged care practice</i>, <i>areas for improvement</i>, and <i>the need for improvement plans</i>, which prompted changes in staff behaviours and better care for residents.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study highlights the value and adaptability of using the most significant change methodology to evaluate complex interventions. This method enriches analysis by emphasising individual experiences, and the dynamics of organisational change. It highlighted subtle changes in aged care practice that would have been difficult to measure including staff behaviour, organisational culture, and the role of leadership in improving care quality for residents.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70017\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Most Significant Change: An Evaluation of Predictive Performance Measures in Nursing Homes
Rationale
Due to their frailty, older people living in nursing homes are at risk of harm if the care provided is not evidence-based and high quality. The performance measures routinely collected to measure quality care in public sector nursing homes in Victoria, Australia, are currently acute care focused and collected ‘after the fact’, so there is a need for predictive performance measures that identify circumstances that reflect poor-quality care that will cause harm to residents.
Aims and Objectives
To evaluate the readiness of public sector nursing homes in Victoria, Australia to introduce predictive performance measures in aged care.
Methods
A qualitative descriptive design was used to evaluate the introduction of eight predictive performance measures in six geographically diverse public sector nursing homes in Victoria, Australia. After implementing the performance measures interviews with staff were undertaken which were used to create 18 most significant change stories. The stories were workshopped by key stakeholders, to detect subtle changes in nursing home staff behaviours and clinical practice.
Results
In the workshop, using the most significant change methodology six themes from the stories, each with sub-themes were identified which reflect the preparedness of nursing homes for the introduction of predictive performance measures, revealing ‘gaps’ in aged care practice, and the need for improvements. These included staff-identified strategies, changes in practice, gaps in aged care practice, areas for improvement, and the need for improvement plans, which prompted changes in staff behaviours and better care for residents.
Conclusions
The study highlights the value and adaptability of using the most significant change methodology to evaluate complex interventions. This method enriches analysis by emphasising individual experiences, and the dynamics of organisational change. It highlighted subtle changes in aged care practice that would have been difficult to measure including staff behaviour, organisational culture, and the role of leadership in improving care quality for residents.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.