Da Zhang , Guangqing Yang , Ting Li , Peng Xu , Penghui Su
{"title":"Model tests study of multi-layer geosynthetic-reinforced pile-supported embankments and evaluation of analytical design models","authors":"Da Zhang , Guangqing Yang , Ting Li , Peng Xu , Penghui Su","doi":"10.1016/j.trgeo.2025.101521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Single and multi-layer geosynthetic-reinforced pile-supported (GRPS) embankments are widely used in practice. Various analytical design models were developed to analyze GRPS embankments. However, engineering experience has shown that the performance of multi-layer GRPS embankments differs from that of single-layer GRPS embankments. The applicability of these analytical design models based on different assumptions has not been fully validated. This paper conducted the physical model test on multi-layer GRPS embankments to clarify their macroscopic mechanical properties. The performance of eight analytical design models under different relative embankment heights was assessed based on the results of the physical model test, using arching efficiency and reinforcement strain as comparison parameters. The results from the physical model test indicated that increasing the number of reinforcement layers in GRPS embankments can more significantly enhance their performance in terms of load transfer and deformation control, as compared to increasing the reinforcement strength of single-layer GRPS embankments. Unlike the membrane behavior exhibited by single-layer reinforcement, the mechanism of multi-layer reinforcement is closer to beam behavior due to the interlock between the reinforcements and the granular fill. Additionally, there is a positive correlation between the prediction accuracy of analytical design models and the relative embankment height, both in predicting the arching efficiency and the reinforcement strain. The accuracy of selected analytical design models in predicting reinforcement strain is found to be weaker in comparison to their predictive capabilities for arching efficiency. Finally, the EBGEO model has good performance, which is grounded in limit equilibrium theory, considers subsoil bearing capacity, and assumes a triangular distribution of the overburden load on the reinforcement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56013,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Geotechnics","volume":"51 ","pages":"Article 101521"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Geotechnics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214391225000406","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Model tests study of multi-layer geosynthetic-reinforced pile-supported embankments and evaluation of analytical design models
Single and multi-layer geosynthetic-reinforced pile-supported (GRPS) embankments are widely used in practice. Various analytical design models were developed to analyze GRPS embankments. However, engineering experience has shown that the performance of multi-layer GRPS embankments differs from that of single-layer GRPS embankments. The applicability of these analytical design models based on different assumptions has not been fully validated. This paper conducted the physical model test on multi-layer GRPS embankments to clarify their macroscopic mechanical properties. The performance of eight analytical design models under different relative embankment heights was assessed based on the results of the physical model test, using arching efficiency and reinforcement strain as comparison parameters. The results from the physical model test indicated that increasing the number of reinforcement layers in GRPS embankments can more significantly enhance their performance in terms of load transfer and deformation control, as compared to increasing the reinforcement strength of single-layer GRPS embankments. Unlike the membrane behavior exhibited by single-layer reinforcement, the mechanism of multi-layer reinforcement is closer to beam behavior due to the interlock between the reinforcements and the granular fill. Additionally, there is a positive correlation between the prediction accuracy of analytical design models and the relative embankment height, both in predicting the arching efficiency and the reinforcement strain. The accuracy of selected analytical design models in predicting reinforcement strain is found to be weaker in comparison to their predictive capabilities for arching efficiency. Finally, the EBGEO model has good performance, which is grounded in limit equilibrium theory, considers subsoil bearing capacity, and assumes a triangular distribution of the overburden load on the reinforcement.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Geotechnics is a journal dedicated to publishing high-quality, theoretical, and applied papers that cover all facets of geotechnics for transportation infrastructure such as roads, highways, railways, underground railways, airfields, and waterways. The journal places a special emphasis on case studies that present original work relevant to the sustainable construction of transportation infrastructure. The scope of topics it addresses includes the geotechnical properties of geomaterials for sustainable and rational design and construction, the behavior of compacted and stabilized geomaterials, the use of geosynthetics and reinforcement in constructed layers and interlayers, ground improvement and slope stability for transportation infrastructures, compaction technology and management, maintenance technology, the impact of climate, embankments for highways and high-speed trains, transition zones, dredging, underwater geotechnics for infrastructure purposes, and the modeling of multi-layered structures and supporting ground under dynamic and repeated loads.