医药供应链管理仿真模型的系统综述:现状和新趋势。

Hellen Nabayiga, Robert Van Der Meer, Mouhamad Shaker Ali Agha
{"title":"医药供应链管理仿真模型的系统综述:现状和新趋势。","authors":"Hellen Nabayiga,&nbsp;Robert Van Der Meer,&nbsp;Mouhamad Shaker Ali Agha","doi":"10.1016/j.dajour.2025.100555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Simulation modelling has widely been applied in healthcare supply chain management, focusing on blood and vaccine supply chains with less attention on the medicine supply chains. This study presents a systematic review of studies applying simulation methods, namely agent-based modelling, discrete event simulation, and system dynamics, to address problems in the medicine supply chain. We adopt the Search, Appraisal, Synthesis, and Analysis (SALSA) approach to collect data from three databases (Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed) from 2000 to 2023. 320 journal publications qualified for the initial screening and filtration and were extracted for further analysis. Only 31 studies met the inclusion criteria, with the first publication identified in 2010 and the last in 2023. The paper shows the usefulness of applying simulation in identifying medicine supply chain bottlenecks pertaining to stockouts (19%, n <span><math><mo>=</mo></math></span> 6), and falsified or counterfeit (16%, n <span><math><mo>=</mo></math></span> 5). System dynamics was the most applied approach with 42% (n <span><math><mo>=</mo></math></span> 13) and 6% (n <span><math><mo>=</mo></math></span> 2) employing a hybrid simulation approach. 32% (n <span><math><mo>=</mo></math></span> 10) of the studies reported verification and validation at either a conceptual or operational level with insufficient data from the real-world system reported as a challenge. The study suggests a gradually increasing interest in simulation applications in medicine supply chains informing decision-making. Combining multiple simulation approaches is recommended to address complex medicine supply chain issues, such as availability. In order to understand the usefulness of the model in decision-making, more effort is needed to validate developed models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100357,"journal":{"name":"Decision Analytics Journal","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100555"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of simulation models in medicine supply chain management: Current state and emerging trends.\",\"authors\":\"Hellen Nabayiga,&nbsp;Robert Van Der Meer,&nbsp;Mouhamad Shaker Ali Agha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dajour.2025.100555\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Simulation modelling has widely been applied in healthcare supply chain management, focusing on blood and vaccine supply chains with less attention on the medicine supply chains. This study presents a systematic review of studies applying simulation methods, namely agent-based modelling, discrete event simulation, and system dynamics, to address problems in the medicine supply chain. We adopt the Search, Appraisal, Synthesis, and Analysis (SALSA) approach to collect data from three databases (Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed) from 2000 to 2023. 320 journal publications qualified for the initial screening and filtration and were extracted for further analysis. Only 31 studies met the inclusion criteria, with the first publication identified in 2010 and the last in 2023. The paper shows the usefulness of applying simulation in identifying medicine supply chain bottlenecks pertaining to stockouts (19%, n <span><math><mo>=</mo></math></span> 6), and falsified or counterfeit (16%, n <span><math><mo>=</mo></math></span> 5). System dynamics was the most applied approach with 42% (n <span><math><mo>=</mo></math></span> 13) and 6% (n <span><math><mo>=</mo></math></span> 2) employing a hybrid simulation approach. 32% (n <span><math><mo>=</mo></math></span> 10) of the studies reported verification and validation at either a conceptual or operational level with insufficient data from the real-world system reported as a challenge. The study suggests a gradually increasing interest in simulation applications in medicine supply chains informing decision-making. Combining multiple simulation approaches is recommended to address complex medicine supply chain issues, such as availability. In order to understand the usefulness of the model in decision-making, more effort is needed to validate developed models.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Decision Analytics Journal\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100555\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Decision Analytics Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772662225000116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decision Analytics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772662225000116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

仿真建模在医疗保健供应链管理中得到了广泛的应用,主要集中在血液和疫苗供应链上,而对药品供应链的关注较少。本研究系统回顾了应用模拟方法的研究,即基于主体的建模、离散事件模拟和系统动力学,以解决药品供应链中的问题。我们采用搜索、评估、综合和分析(SALSA)方法从三个数据库(Scopus、Web of Science和PubMed)中收集2000年至2023年的数据。320份期刊出版物符合初步筛选和过滤条件,并被提取出来进行进一步分析。只有31项研究符合纳入标准,其中第一篇发表于2010年,最后一篇发表于2023年。该论文表明,在识别与缺货(19%,n = 6)和伪造或假冒(16%,n = 5)有关的药品供应链瓶颈方面,应用模拟是有用的。系统动力学是应用最多的方法,42% (n = 13)和6% (n = 2)采用混合模拟方法。32% (n = 10)的研究报告在概念或操作层面进行了验证和确认,来自现实世界系统的数据不足被认为是一个挑战。该研究表明,人们对模拟应用于医药供应链决策的兴趣逐渐增加。建议结合多种模拟方法来解决复杂的药品供应链问题,例如可用性。为了理解模型在决策中的有用性,需要更多的工作来验证开发的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A systematic review of simulation models in medicine supply chain management: Current state and emerging trends.
Simulation modelling has widely been applied in healthcare supply chain management, focusing on blood and vaccine supply chains with less attention on the medicine supply chains. This study presents a systematic review of studies applying simulation methods, namely agent-based modelling, discrete event simulation, and system dynamics, to address problems in the medicine supply chain. We adopt the Search, Appraisal, Synthesis, and Analysis (SALSA) approach to collect data from three databases (Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed) from 2000 to 2023. 320 journal publications qualified for the initial screening and filtration and were extracted for further analysis. Only 31 studies met the inclusion criteria, with the first publication identified in 2010 and the last in 2023. The paper shows the usefulness of applying simulation in identifying medicine supply chain bottlenecks pertaining to stockouts (19%, n = 6), and falsified or counterfeit (16%, n = 5). System dynamics was the most applied approach with 42% (n = 13) and 6% (n = 2) employing a hybrid simulation approach. 32% (n = 10) of the studies reported verification and validation at either a conceptual or operational level with insufficient data from the real-world system reported as a challenge. The study suggests a gradually increasing interest in simulation applications in medicine supply chains informing decision-making. Combining multiple simulation approaches is recommended to address complex medicine supply chain issues, such as availability. In order to understand the usefulness of the model in decision-making, more effort is needed to validate developed models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信