IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Clarisse Dibao-Dina, Nasri Lydia, Dagot Céline, Fouquet Jean-Philippe, Rideau Sophie, Dumas Vincent, Neff Guillaume, Payen Véronique, Rube-Millon Delphine, Lemaile Marie, Nkodo Jacques-Alexis, Camus Vincent, Fougère Bertrand, Giraudeau Bruno, Beauchamp Dominique, Foucault Fruchard Laura, Renoux Cécile, Robert Jean
{"title":"Identifying the needs of natural caregivers caring for a person with dementia: a mixed method study.","authors":"Clarisse Dibao-Dina, Nasri Lydia, Dagot Céline, Fouquet Jean-Philippe, Rideau Sophie, Dumas Vincent, Neff Guillaume, Payen Véronique, Rube-Millon Delphine, Lemaile Marie, Nkodo Jacques-Alexis, Camus Vincent, Fougère Bertrand, Giraudeau Bruno, Beauchamp Dominique, Foucault Fruchard Laura, Renoux Cécile, Robert Jean","doi":"10.1186/s12875-025-02724-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many available interventions to reduce challenges of natural caregivers of people living with dementia have limited efficacy since they do not meet the caregiver's individual needs. This study aims to evaluate caregivers' needs with the future goal of developing a tailored, multicomponent intervention to ease caregiver challenges through appropriate caregiver-centred interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mixed method study using a convergent design with quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis performed at similar times. For the cross-sectional quantitative study, questionnaires were sent to natural adult caregivers of a person with dementia identified by local healthcare professionals and general practitioners exercising in a rural and an urban department. For the qualitative descriptive study, individual caregiver interviews and healthcare professional focus groups were conducted in two primary healthcare territories in both departments. Data about screening for caregiver challenges and any help provided to the caregiver were collected. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and qualitative data underwent thematic analysis using the grounded theory approach. Quantitative and qualitative results were described using a narrative discussion approach, then results were combined on a theme-by-theme basis using the weaving approach enabling integrated analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 199 general practitioners and 67 caregivers participated in the quantitative study. In the qualitative study, 10 caregivers from the urban area and 12 caregivers from the rural area participated in the individual interviews, and 9 healthcare professionals participated in the focus groups. Our broad categories of caregiver needs were identified: awareness and early diagnosis, information and training, practical, coordinated support, and psychological support. The integrated analysis highlighted areas for improvement in meeting these needs, especially a better identification of the caregiver role, caregiver distress, better information about what the caregiver has to expect in terms of the disease's progression and daily management, ways to improve awareness in general population, acceptation of practical support and its coordination and adaptation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Identified needs were concordant with those in the literature. The mixed method used enabled expectations to be explored by analysing together the points of view of both patients and healthcare professionals in order to identify ways of improving their care.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"26 1","pages":"48"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846302/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02724-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:现有的许多旨在减轻痴呆症患者的自然照顾者所面临的挑战的干预措施效果有限,因为它们不能满足照顾者的个人需求。本研究旨在评估照护者的需求,未来目标是开发一种量身定制的多成分干预措施,通过以照护者为中心的适当干预措施来缓解照护者面临的挑战:方法:混合方法研究,采用聚合设计,定量和定性数据的收集和分析在相同的时间进行。在横断面定量研究中,向由当地医疗保健专业人员和在农村和城市部门工作的全科医生确定的痴呆症患者的自然成年照顾者发送了调查问卷。在定性描述研究中,我们在这两个部门的两个初级医疗保健地区进行了护理人员个人访谈和医疗保健专业人员焦点小组。研究收集了有关护理挑战筛查和向护理人员提供帮助的数据。定量数据采用描述性统计方法进行分析,定性数据则采用基础理论方法进行主题分析。定量和定性结果采用叙事讨论法进行描述,然后采用编织法将结果按主题进行合并,以便进行综合分析:共有 199 名全科医生和 67 名护理人员参与了定量研究。在定性研究中,10 名来自城市地区的护理人员和 12 名来自农村地区的护理人员参加了个人访谈,9 名医疗保健专业人员参加了焦点小组。我们确定了护理人员需求的几大类:认识和早期诊断、信息和培训、实际协调支持以及心理支持。综合分析强调了在满足这些需求方面需要改进的地方,特别是更好地确定护理者的角色、护理者的痛苦、更好地了解护理者在疾病进展和日常管理方面的预期、提高普通人群认识的方法、接受实际支持及其协调和适应:结论:所确定的需求与文献中的需求一致。所采用的混合方法通过分析患者和医护人员的观点,探讨了他们的期望,从而确定了改善护理的方法:试验注册:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identifying the needs of natural caregivers caring for a person with dementia: a mixed method study.

Background: Many available interventions to reduce challenges of natural caregivers of people living with dementia have limited efficacy since they do not meet the caregiver's individual needs. This study aims to evaluate caregivers' needs with the future goal of developing a tailored, multicomponent intervention to ease caregiver challenges through appropriate caregiver-centred interventions.

Methods: Mixed method study using a convergent design with quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis performed at similar times. For the cross-sectional quantitative study, questionnaires were sent to natural adult caregivers of a person with dementia identified by local healthcare professionals and general practitioners exercising in a rural and an urban department. For the qualitative descriptive study, individual caregiver interviews and healthcare professional focus groups were conducted in two primary healthcare territories in both departments. Data about screening for caregiver challenges and any help provided to the caregiver were collected. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and qualitative data underwent thematic analysis using the grounded theory approach. Quantitative and qualitative results were described using a narrative discussion approach, then results were combined on a theme-by-theme basis using the weaving approach enabling integrated analysis.

Results: A total of 199 general practitioners and 67 caregivers participated in the quantitative study. In the qualitative study, 10 caregivers from the urban area and 12 caregivers from the rural area participated in the individual interviews, and 9 healthcare professionals participated in the focus groups. Our broad categories of caregiver needs were identified: awareness and early diagnosis, information and training, practical, coordinated support, and psychological support. The integrated analysis highlighted areas for improvement in meeting these needs, especially a better identification of the caregiver role, caregiver distress, better information about what the caregiver has to expect in terms of the disease's progression and daily management, ways to improve awareness in general population, acceptation of practical support and its coordination and adaptation.

Conclusions: Identified needs were concordant with those in the literature. The mixed method used enabled expectations to be explored by analysing together the points of view of both patients and healthcare professionals in order to identify ways of improving their care.

Trial registration: Not applicable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信