关节镜下骨Bankart桥治疗骨Bankart病变后至少10年的临床和功能结果。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Maximilian Hinz MD , Bradley M. Kruckeberg MD , Caleb S. Davis MD , Mark E. Cinque MD , Marilee P. Horan MPH , Amelia Drumm BA , Matthew T. Provencher MD, MBA, MC USNR (Ret) (CAPT) , Peter J. Millett MD, MSc
{"title":"关节镜下骨Bankart桥治疗骨Bankart病变后至少10年的临床和功能结果。","authors":"Maximilian Hinz MD ,&nbsp;Bradley M. Kruckeberg MD ,&nbsp;Caleb S. Davis MD ,&nbsp;Mark E. Cinque MD ,&nbsp;Marilee P. Horan MPH ,&nbsp;Amelia Drumm BA ,&nbsp;Matthew T. Provencher MD, MBA, MC USNR (Ret) (CAPT) ,&nbsp;Peter J. Millett MD, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2025.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Shoulder dislocations may lead to anterior glenoid rim fractures. An all-arthroscopic double-row repair, referred to as the bony Bankart bridge (BBB), has been proposed with superior biomechanical properties when compared to single-row repair techniques. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the minimum 10-year clinical and functional outcomes following BBB.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic BBB for the treatment of shoulder instability with an associated bony Bankart lesion by a single surgeon between December 2007 and February 2013 were eligible for inclusion. Preoperatively and minimum 10 years postoperatively, patient-reported outcome measures (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary, satisfaction with the postoperative result [1-10 scale with “10” indicating maximum satisfaction], and visual analog scale for pain), return to sport rates, and instability recurrence and revision surgery rates were evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eleven patients (100% male) with a mean age at the time of surgery of 48.0 (interquartile range: 31.0-62.0) years were evaluated 14.0 (11.0-14.0) years postoperatively. At long-term follow-up, significant improvements in shoulder function (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score: 74.9 [30.8-90.8] vs. 100 [98.3-100], <em>P</em> &lt; .001; Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand: 13.6 [10.0-63.6] vs. 0.0 [0.0-6.8], <em>P</em> = .002; Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation: 50.0 [19.0-90.0] vs. 96.0 [89.0-99.0], <em>P</em> = .002) and physical health (12-Item Short-Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary: 44.1 [35.1-55.7] vs. 57.3 [56.5-58.5], <em>P</em> &lt; .001) were observed. Median satisfaction with the postoperative outcome was high (10 [5.0-10]). Pain levels were low (visual analog scale for pain: 0 [0-0]). Ten patients reported their postoperative sporting activity level with the majority patients reporting sporting activity levels equal to or above (70.0%) their preinjury level. One patient (9.1%) reported a shoulder redislocation during follow-up. No patients underwent further surgery for instability or post-traumatic osteoarthritis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The arthroscopic BBB for patients with bony Bankart lesions is associated with excellent shoulder function, low pain levels, and high return to sport rates at long-term follow-up. One patient suffered a shoulder redislocation, but did not require revision surgery. No patients underwent further surgery for post-traumatic osteoarthritis during follow-up.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":"34 6","pages":"Pages S57-S63"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimum 10-year clinical and functional outcomes after arthroscopic bony Bankart bridge for the treatment of bony Bankart lesions\",\"authors\":\"Maximilian Hinz MD ,&nbsp;Bradley M. Kruckeberg MD ,&nbsp;Caleb S. Davis MD ,&nbsp;Mark E. Cinque MD ,&nbsp;Marilee P. Horan MPH ,&nbsp;Amelia Drumm BA ,&nbsp;Matthew T. Provencher MD, MBA, MC USNR (Ret) (CAPT) ,&nbsp;Peter J. Millett MD, MSc\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jse.2025.02.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Shoulder dislocations may lead to anterior glenoid rim fractures. An all-arthroscopic double-row repair, referred to as the bony Bankart bridge (BBB), has been proposed with superior biomechanical properties when compared to single-row repair techniques. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the minimum 10-year clinical and functional outcomes following BBB.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic BBB for the treatment of shoulder instability with an associated bony Bankart lesion by a single surgeon between December 2007 and February 2013 were eligible for inclusion. Preoperatively and minimum 10 years postoperatively, patient-reported outcome measures (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary, satisfaction with the postoperative result [1-10 scale with “10” indicating maximum satisfaction], and visual analog scale for pain), return to sport rates, and instability recurrence and revision surgery rates were evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eleven patients (100% male) with a mean age at the time of surgery of 48.0 (interquartile range: 31.0-62.0) years were evaluated 14.0 (11.0-14.0) years postoperatively. At long-term follow-up, significant improvements in shoulder function (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score: 74.9 [30.8-90.8] vs. 100 [98.3-100], <em>P</em> &lt; .001; Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand: 13.6 [10.0-63.6] vs. 0.0 [0.0-6.8], <em>P</em> = .002; Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation: 50.0 [19.0-90.0] vs. 96.0 [89.0-99.0], <em>P</em> = .002) and physical health (12-Item Short-Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary: 44.1 [35.1-55.7] vs. 57.3 [56.5-58.5], <em>P</em> &lt; .001) were observed. Median satisfaction with the postoperative outcome was high (10 [5.0-10]). Pain levels were low (visual analog scale for pain: 0 [0-0]). Ten patients reported their postoperative sporting activity level with the majority patients reporting sporting activity levels equal to or above (70.0%) their preinjury level. One patient (9.1%) reported a shoulder redislocation during follow-up. No patients underwent further surgery for instability or post-traumatic osteoarthritis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The arthroscopic BBB for patients with bony Bankart lesions is associated with excellent shoulder function, low pain levels, and high return to sport rates at long-term follow-up. One patient suffered a shoulder redislocation, but did not require revision surgery. No patients underwent further surgery for post-traumatic osteoarthritis during follow-up.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery\",\"volume\":\"34 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages S57-S63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1058274625001636\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1058274625001636","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肩关节脱位可导致前盂缘骨折。与单排修复技术相比,全关节镜双排修复技术被称为骨Bankart桥(BBB),具有优越的生物力学性能。本研究的目的是评估BBB后至少10年的临床和功能结果。方法:2007年12月至2013年2月期间,同一位外科医生连续接受关节镜下BBB治疗肩关节不稳定伴骨Bankart病变的所有患者均符合纳入条件。术前和术后至少10年,患者报告的结果测量(美国肩肘外科医生[as]评分,臂、肩和手残疾简短版问卷[QuickDASH],单一评估数字评估[SANE], 12项简短健康调查物理成分摘要[pc -12]),对术后结果的满意度[1-10量表,“10”表示最大满意度],以及疼痛的视觉模拟量表[VAS]),评估恢复运动率、不稳定复发率和翻修手术率。结果:11例患者(100%为男性),手术时平均年龄为48.0岁(四分位数范围31.0 ~ 62.0岁),术后14.0岁(11.0 ~ 14.0)。在长期随访中,肩关节功能显著改善(as评分:74.9 [30.8-90.8]vs. 100 [98.3-100], P < 0.001;QuickDASH: 13.6(10.0 - -63.6)和0.0 (0.0 - -6.8),P = .002;体格健康(pss12: 44.1[35.1-55.7]对57.3 [56.5-58.5],P < 0.001)。术后结果满意度中位数较高(10[5.0-10])。疼痛程度低(VAS疼痛评分:0[0-0])。10例患者报告其术后运动水平,大多数患者报告其运动水平等于或高于损伤前水平(70.0%)。1例患者(9.1%)在随访期间报告肩部再脱位。没有患者因不稳定或创伤后骨关节炎(pta)接受进一步手术。结论:在长期随访中,关节镜下BBB治疗骨性Bankart病变患者具有良好的肩关节功能、低疼痛水平和高运动恢复率。一名患者肩部再次脱位,但不需要翻修手术。随访期间无患者接受进一步手术治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Minimum 10-year clinical and functional outcomes after arthroscopic bony Bankart bridge for the treatment of bony Bankart lesions

Background

Shoulder dislocations may lead to anterior glenoid rim fractures. An all-arthroscopic double-row repair, referred to as the bony Bankart bridge (BBB), has been proposed with superior biomechanical properties when compared to single-row repair techniques. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the minimum 10-year clinical and functional outcomes following BBB.

Methods

All consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic BBB for the treatment of shoulder instability with an associated bony Bankart lesion by a single surgeon between December 2007 and February 2013 were eligible for inclusion. Preoperatively and minimum 10 years postoperatively, patient-reported outcome measures (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary, satisfaction with the postoperative result [1-10 scale with “10” indicating maximum satisfaction], and visual analog scale for pain), return to sport rates, and instability recurrence and revision surgery rates were evaluated.

Results

Eleven patients (100% male) with a mean age at the time of surgery of 48.0 (interquartile range: 31.0-62.0) years were evaluated 14.0 (11.0-14.0) years postoperatively. At long-term follow-up, significant improvements in shoulder function (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score: 74.9 [30.8-90.8] vs. 100 [98.3-100], P < .001; Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand: 13.6 [10.0-63.6] vs. 0.0 [0.0-6.8], P = .002; Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation: 50.0 [19.0-90.0] vs. 96.0 [89.0-99.0], P = .002) and physical health (12-Item Short-Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary: 44.1 [35.1-55.7] vs. 57.3 [56.5-58.5], P < .001) were observed. Median satisfaction with the postoperative outcome was high (10 [5.0-10]). Pain levels were low (visual analog scale for pain: 0 [0-0]). Ten patients reported their postoperative sporting activity level with the majority patients reporting sporting activity levels equal to or above (70.0%) their preinjury level. One patient (9.1%) reported a shoulder redislocation during follow-up. No patients underwent further surgery for instability or post-traumatic osteoarthritis.

Conclusion

The arthroscopic BBB for patients with bony Bankart lesions is associated with excellent shoulder function, low pain levels, and high return to sport rates at long-term follow-up. One patient suffered a shoulder redislocation, but did not require revision surgery. No patients underwent further surgery for post-traumatic osteoarthritis during follow-up.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信