上半规管近开裂和完全开裂:临床结果比较分析。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Hong-Ho Yang, Cheikh Mballo, Isaac Yang, Quinton S Gopen
{"title":"上半规管近开裂和完全开裂:临床结果比较分析。","authors":"Hong-Ho Yang, Cheikh Mballo, Isaac Yang, Quinton S Gopen","doi":"10.3171/2024.9.JNS241347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Superior canal dehiscence is a pathological aperture of the otic capsule overlying the superior semicircular canal. Currently, two disease subtypes are recognized by experts: frank dehiscence (FD) and near dehiscence (ND). This investigation compares the clinical manifestation and surgical outcomes between patients with FDs and those with NDs, in hopes of delineating their distinctions in pathophysiology and optimal management strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors conducted a cohort study of consecutive middle cranial fossa repairs performed at their institution between 2011 and 2022. FDs were defined as clear dehiscence of the otic capsule, and NDs were defined as focal dehiscence or very thin bony labyrinth (< 0.1 mm) on CT imaging. Multivariable regression models were constructed to assess the relationship of dehiscence subtype with audiometric and symptomatologic baseline presentation and postrepair outcomes. Models were adjusted for demographics, history factors, and follow-up duration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 421 repairs included, 100 (24%) were for NDs and 321 (76%) were for FDs. At 250 Hz, FDs and NDs had a comparable baseline air-bone gap (ABG) (adjusted mean 23.8 dB vs 11.1 dB; adjusted β [aβ] 12.8, 95% CI -0.4 to 25.9) and exhibited a similar degree of narrowing postrepair (-11.7 vs -5.5; aβ -6.2, 95% CI -16.8 to 4.5). At 500 Hz, FDs had a wider baseline ABG (15.4 vs 6.4; aβ 9.1, 95% CI 4.3-13.8) but exhibited numerically greater narrowing postrepair (-6.1 vs 1.1; aβ -7.2, 95% CI -11.4 to -3.0). Despite similar baseline symptomatology, patients with FDs reported lower resolution rates of hearing loss (adjusted OR [aOR] 0.43, 95% CI 0.20-0.94) and higher postoperative onset rates of dizziness (aOR 5.12, 95% CI 1.06-24.76) and vertigo (aOR 8.56, 95% CI 1.11-66.16). Resolution rates for autophony and hyperacusis were similarly high (> 60%) among both cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to patients with NDs, those with FDs presented with a wider low-frequency ABG but similar symptom profile at baseline. Postsurgery, patients with FDs demonstrated numerically greater ABG narrowing but reported higher rates of dizziness, vertigo, and persistent hearing loss. Nevertheless, surgery yielded objective and subjective benefits among both patients with FDs and those with NDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Near and frank dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal: a comparative analysis of clinical outcome.\",\"authors\":\"Hong-Ho Yang, Cheikh Mballo, Isaac Yang, Quinton S Gopen\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2024.9.JNS241347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Superior canal dehiscence is a pathological aperture of the otic capsule overlying the superior semicircular canal. Currently, two disease subtypes are recognized by experts: frank dehiscence (FD) and near dehiscence (ND). This investigation compares the clinical manifestation and surgical outcomes between patients with FDs and those with NDs, in hopes of delineating their distinctions in pathophysiology and optimal management strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors conducted a cohort study of consecutive middle cranial fossa repairs performed at their institution between 2011 and 2022. FDs were defined as clear dehiscence of the otic capsule, and NDs were defined as focal dehiscence or very thin bony labyrinth (< 0.1 mm) on CT imaging. Multivariable regression models were constructed to assess the relationship of dehiscence subtype with audiometric and symptomatologic baseline presentation and postrepair outcomes. Models were adjusted for demographics, history factors, and follow-up duration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 421 repairs included, 100 (24%) were for NDs and 321 (76%) were for FDs. At 250 Hz, FDs and NDs had a comparable baseline air-bone gap (ABG) (adjusted mean 23.8 dB vs 11.1 dB; adjusted β [aβ] 12.8, 95% CI -0.4 to 25.9) and exhibited a similar degree of narrowing postrepair (-11.7 vs -5.5; aβ -6.2, 95% CI -16.8 to 4.5). At 500 Hz, FDs had a wider baseline ABG (15.4 vs 6.4; aβ 9.1, 95% CI 4.3-13.8) but exhibited numerically greater narrowing postrepair (-6.1 vs 1.1; aβ -7.2, 95% CI -11.4 to -3.0). Despite similar baseline symptomatology, patients with FDs reported lower resolution rates of hearing loss (adjusted OR [aOR] 0.43, 95% CI 0.20-0.94) and higher postoperative onset rates of dizziness (aOR 5.12, 95% CI 1.06-24.76) and vertigo (aOR 8.56, 95% CI 1.11-66.16). Resolution rates for autophony and hyperacusis were similarly high (> 60%) among both cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to patients with NDs, those with FDs presented with a wider low-frequency ABG but similar symptom profile at baseline. Postsurgery, patients with FDs demonstrated numerically greater ABG narrowing but reported higher rates of dizziness, vertigo, and persistent hearing loss. Nevertheless, surgery yielded objective and subjective benefits among both patients with FDs and those with NDs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.9.JNS241347\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.9.JNS241347","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Near and frank dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal: a comparative analysis of clinical outcome.

Objective: Superior canal dehiscence is a pathological aperture of the otic capsule overlying the superior semicircular canal. Currently, two disease subtypes are recognized by experts: frank dehiscence (FD) and near dehiscence (ND). This investigation compares the clinical manifestation and surgical outcomes between patients with FDs and those with NDs, in hopes of delineating their distinctions in pathophysiology and optimal management strategies.

Methods: The authors conducted a cohort study of consecutive middle cranial fossa repairs performed at their institution between 2011 and 2022. FDs were defined as clear dehiscence of the otic capsule, and NDs were defined as focal dehiscence or very thin bony labyrinth (< 0.1 mm) on CT imaging. Multivariable regression models were constructed to assess the relationship of dehiscence subtype with audiometric and symptomatologic baseline presentation and postrepair outcomes. Models were adjusted for demographics, history factors, and follow-up duration.

Results: Among 421 repairs included, 100 (24%) were for NDs and 321 (76%) were for FDs. At 250 Hz, FDs and NDs had a comparable baseline air-bone gap (ABG) (adjusted mean 23.8 dB vs 11.1 dB; adjusted β [aβ] 12.8, 95% CI -0.4 to 25.9) and exhibited a similar degree of narrowing postrepair (-11.7 vs -5.5; aβ -6.2, 95% CI -16.8 to 4.5). At 500 Hz, FDs had a wider baseline ABG (15.4 vs 6.4; aβ 9.1, 95% CI 4.3-13.8) but exhibited numerically greater narrowing postrepair (-6.1 vs 1.1; aβ -7.2, 95% CI -11.4 to -3.0). Despite similar baseline symptomatology, patients with FDs reported lower resolution rates of hearing loss (adjusted OR [aOR] 0.43, 95% CI 0.20-0.94) and higher postoperative onset rates of dizziness (aOR 5.12, 95% CI 1.06-24.76) and vertigo (aOR 8.56, 95% CI 1.11-66.16). Resolution rates for autophony and hyperacusis were similarly high (> 60%) among both cohorts.

Conclusions: Compared to patients with NDs, those with FDs presented with a wider low-frequency ABG but similar symptom profile at baseline. Postsurgery, patients with FDs demonstrated numerically greater ABG narrowing but reported higher rates of dizziness, vertigo, and persistent hearing loss. Nevertheless, surgery yielded objective and subjective benefits among both patients with FDs and those with NDs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信