不确定性条件下的战略性仓储投资与运营:行为经济学分析

IF 6.7 2区 计算机科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Qisheng Huang;Jin Xu;Peng Sun;Bo Liu;Ting Wu;Costas Courcoubetis
{"title":"不确定性条件下的战略性仓储投资与运营:行为经济学分析","authors":"Qisheng Huang;Jin Xu;Peng Sun;Bo Liu;Ting Wu;Costas Courcoubetis","doi":"10.1109/TNSE.2025.3528554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we propose a two-stage Stackelberg game to investigate the strategic storage investment and operation interaction between the storage aggregator and consumers under demand uncertainty. In the first stage, the storage aggregator makes the storage investment and pricing decisions to maximize its profit. After observing the storage aggregator's decisions, each consumer makes its own storage operation decisions to minimize its electricity bill. Different from previous studies that mainly assumed a risk-neutral consumer based on the expected utility theory (EUT), we propose a prospect theory (PT) model to capture consumers' risk preferences. To solve the PT-based non-convex problem, we exploit the unimodal structure of the objective function and characterize the equilibrium solutions. Theoretical and numerical results show that the consumers' risk preferences have significant impacts on the equilibrium solutions: 1) a PT-consumer with a low reference point is more willing to use energy storage to reduce risk compared with the EUT benchmark; 2) a PT consumer is more willing to use the energy storage when the probability of high demand is small, due to the probability distortion; 3) the consumers with a lower level of risk preference are easier to be affected by the increase of storage investment cost.","PeriodicalId":54229,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering","volume":"12 2","pages":"1329-1342"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategic Storage Investment and Operation Under Uncertainty: Behavioral Economics Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Qisheng Huang;Jin Xu;Peng Sun;Bo Liu;Ting Wu;Costas Courcoubetis\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TNSE.2025.3528554\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we propose a two-stage Stackelberg game to investigate the strategic storage investment and operation interaction between the storage aggregator and consumers under demand uncertainty. In the first stage, the storage aggregator makes the storage investment and pricing decisions to maximize its profit. After observing the storage aggregator's decisions, each consumer makes its own storage operation decisions to minimize its electricity bill. Different from previous studies that mainly assumed a risk-neutral consumer based on the expected utility theory (EUT), we propose a prospect theory (PT) model to capture consumers' risk preferences. To solve the PT-based non-convex problem, we exploit the unimodal structure of the objective function and characterize the equilibrium solutions. Theoretical and numerical results show that the consumers' risk preferences have significant impacts on the equilibrium solutions: 1) a PT-consumer with a low reference point is more willing to use energy storage to reduce risk compared with the EUT benchmark; 2) a PT consumer is more willing to use the energy storage when the probability of high demand is small, due to the probability distortion; 3) the consumers with a lower level of risk preference are easier to be affected by the increase of storage investment cost.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"1329-1342\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10839137/\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10839137/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了一个两阶段Stackelberg博弈模型来研究需求不确定性下储能聚合商与消费者之间的储能战略投资和运营交互。在第一阶段,存储聚合器进行存储投资和定价决策,以实现其利润最大化。在观察存储聚合器的决策后,每个用户做出自己的存储操作决策,以最小化其电费。不同于以往的研究主要基于期望效用理论(EUT)假设风险中性的消费者,本文提出了一个前景理论(PT)模型来捕捉消费者的风险偏好。为了解决基于pt的非凸问题,我们利用目标函数的单峰结构并对平衡解进行表征。理论和数值结果表明,消费者的风险偏好对均衡解决方案有显著影响:1)与EUT基准相比,低参考点的pt消费者更愿意使用储能来降低风险;2)由于概率失真,当高需求概率较小时,PT消费者更愿意使用储能;3)风险偏好水平较低的消费者更容易受到仓储投资成本增加的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strategic Storage Investment and Operation Under Uncertainty: Behavioral Economics Analysis
In this paper, we propose a two-stage Stackelberg game to investigate the strategic storage investment and operation interaction between the storage aggregator and consumers under demand uncertainty. In the first stage, the storage aggregator makes the storage investment and pricing decisions to maximize its profit. After observing the storage aggregator's decisions, each consumer makes its own storage operation decisions to minimize its electricity bill. Different from previous studies that mainly assumed a risk-neutral consumer based on the expected utility theory (EUT), we propose a prospect theory (PT) model to capture consumers' risk preferences. To solve the PT-based non-convex problem, we exploit the unimodal structure of the objective function and characterize the equilibrium solutions. Theoretical and numerical results show that the consumers' risk preferences have significant impacts on the equilibrium solutions: 1) a PT-consumer with a low reference point is more willing to use energy storage to reduce risk compared with the EUT benchmark; 2) a PT consumer is more willing to use the energy storage when the probability of high demand is small, due to the probability distortion; 3) the consumers with a lower level of risk preference are easier to be affected by the increase of storage investment cost.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering
IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering Engineering-Control and Systems Engineering
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
393
期刊介绍: The proposed journal, called the IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering (TNSE), is committed to timely publishing of peer-reviewed technical articles that deal with the theory and applications of network science and the interconnections among the elements in a system that form a network. In particular, the IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering publishes articles on understanding, prediction, and control of structures and behaviors of networks at the fundamental level. The types of networks covered include physical or engineered networks, information networks, biological networks, semantic networks, economic networks, social networks, and ecological networks. Aimed at discovering common principles that govern network structures, network functionalities and behaviors of networks, the journal seeks articles on understanding, prediction, and control of structures and behaviors of networks. Another trans-disciplinary focus of the IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering is the interactions between and co-evolution of different genres of networks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信