生态系统有机物分解呼吸商数的控制因素

IF 3.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Konstantinos-Marios Vaziourakis, Liam Heffernan, Elizabeth Jakobsson, Charlotte Grasset, Dolly Kothawala, Lars Tranvik
{"title":"生态系统有机物分解呼吸商数的控制因素","authors":"Konstantinos-Marios Vaziourakis,&nbsp;Liam Heffernan,&nbsp;Elizabeth Jakobsson,&nbsp;Charlotte Grasset,&nbsp;Dolly Kothawala,&nbsp;Lars Tranvik","doi":"10.1007/s10533-025-01217-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is substantial variation in estimates of the respiratory quotient (RQ), i.e., molar ratio of produced CO<sub>2</sub> and consumed O<sub>2</sub> during microbial mineralization of organic matter (OM). While several studies have examined RQ's controlling factors in terrestrial or aquatic ecosystems, there are no broader cross-ecosystem comparisons, and there is a lack of general understanding of the extrinsic (environmental) and intrinsic (organic matter composition) controls on RQ. In this study, we examine RQ across a broad range of environments, including soils, aquatic sediments, lake and coastal water. We measured CO<sub>2</sub> production and O<sub>2</sub> consumption using membrane inlet mass spectrometry (MIMS). We also assessed the microbial metabolic profiles using BIOLOG EcoPlates and determined the energy content of the natural OM with bomb calorimetry and its elemental composition. We show that RQ differs significantly between the ecosystem types and strongly deviates from the frequently assumed value of 1. In addition, microbial mineralization across the different studied ecosystems is correlated with the bulk energy content of the OM (kJ g<sup>−1</sup> organic carbon). Finally, RQ was correlated to the metabolic profiles of microorganisms, as estimated based on BIOLOG EcoPlates. We argue that an increased use of cross-ecosystem experimental studies will enhance the understanding of the factors controlling carbon cycling.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8901,"journal":{"name":"Biogeochemistry","volume":"168 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10533-025-01217-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Controls on the respiratory quotient of organic matter decomposition across ecosystems\",\"authors\":\"Konstantinos-Marios Vaziourakis,&nbsp;Liam Heffernan,&nbsp;Elizabeth Jakobsson,&nbsp;Charlotte Grasset,&nbsp;Dolly Kothawala,&nbsp;Lars Tranvik\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10533-025-01217-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>There is substantial variation in estimates of the respiratory quotient (RQ), i.e., molar ratio of produced CO<sub>2</sub> and consumed O<sub>2</sub> during microbial mineralization of organic matter (OM). While several studies have examined RQ's controlling factors in terrestrial or aquatic ecosystems, there are no broader cross-ecosystem comparisons, and there is a lack of general understanding of the extrinsic (environmental) and intrinsic (organic matter composition) controls on RQ. In this study, we examine RQ across a broad range of environments, including soils, aquatic sediments, lake and coastal water. We measured CO<sub>2</sub> production and O<sub>2</sub> consumption using membrane inlet mass spectrometry (MIMS). We also assessed the microbial metabolic profiles using BIOLOG EcoPlates and determined the energy content of the natural OM with bomb calorimetry and its elemental composition. We show that RQ differs significantly between the ecosystem types and strongly deviates from the frequently assumed value of 1. In addition, microbial mineralization across the different studied ecosystems is correlated with the bulk energy content of the OM (kJ g<sup>−1</sup> organic carbon). Finally, RQ was correlated to the metabolic profiles of microorganisms, as estimated based on BIOLOG EcoPlates. We argue that an increased use of cross-ecosystem experimental studies will enhance the understanding of the factors controlling carbon cycling.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biogeochemistry\",\"volume\":\"168 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10533-025-01217-8.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biogeochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10533-025-01217-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biogeochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10533-025-01217-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

呼吸商(RQ),即微生物矿化有机物(OM)过程中产生的CO2和消耗的O2的摩尔比,在估计上有很大的差异。虽然一些研究已经检查了陆地或水生生态系统中RQ的控制因素,但没有更广泛的跨生态系统比较,并且缺乏对RQ的外在(环境)和内在(有机质组成)控制的一般理解。在这项研究中,我们在广泛的环境中研究RQ,包括土壤、水生沉积物、湖泊和沿海水域。我们使用膜入口质谱法(MIMS)测量CO2产量和O2消耗。我们还使用BIOLOG EcoPlates评估了微生物代谢谱,并使用弹量热法测定了天然OM的能量含量及其元素组成。研究表明,不同生态系统类型之间的RQ差异显著,并且严重偏离了通常假设的值1。此外,不同生态系统的微生物矿化与有机质(kJ g−1有机碳)的体积能量含量相关。最后,RQ与微生物的代谢谱相关,根据BIOLOG EcoPlates估计。我们认为,增加跨生态系统实验研究的使用将增强对控制碳循环因素的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Controls on the respiratory quotient of organic matter decomposition across ecosystems

There is substantial variation in estimates of the respiratory quotient (RQ), i.e., molar ratio of produced CO2 and consumed O2 during microbial mineralization of organic matter (OM). While several studies have examined RQ's controlling factors in terrestrial or aquatic ecosystems, there are no broader cross-ecosystem comparisons, and there is a lack of general understanding of the extrinsic (environmental) and intrinsic (organic matter composition) controls on RQ. In this study, we examine RQ across a broad range of environments, including soils, aquatic sediments, lake and coastal water. We measured CO2 production and O2 consumption using membrane inlet mass spectrometry (MIMS). We also assessed the microbial metabolic profiles using BIOLOG EcoPlates and determined the energy content of the natural OM with bomb calorimetry and its elemental composition. We show that RQ differs significantly between the ecosystem types and strongly deviates from the frequently assumed value of 1. In addition, microbial mineralization across the different studied ecosystems is correlated with the bulk energy content of the OM (kJ g−1 organic carbon). Finally, RQ was correlated to the metabolic profiles of microorganisms, as estimated based on BIOLOG EcoPlates. We argue that an increased use of cross-ecosystem experimental studies will enhance the understanding of the factors controlling carbon cycling.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biogeochemistry
Biogeochemistry 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
3.2 months
期刊介绍: Biogeochemistry publishes original and synthetic papers dealing with biotic controls on the chemistry of the environment, or with the geochemical control of the structure and function of ecosystems. Cycles are considered, either of individual elements or of specific classes of natural or anthropogenic compounds in ecosystems. Particular emphasis is given to coupled interactions of element cycles. The journal spans from the molecular to global scales to elucidate the mechanisms driving patterns in biogeochemical cycles through space and time. Studies on both natural and artificial ecosystems are published when they contribute to a general understanding of biogeochemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信