IF 1.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Journal of clinical medicine research Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.14740/jocmr6159
Anas Elgenidy, Ahmed Yasser Shaban, Khaled Saad, Yasser Hamed, Ahmed Elhadi Rhab, Mohamed Khalafalla Darwish, Alaa Essam Kamal, Mohamed Salem Abdelkader, Hamza Anas Marzouk, Mohamed Mahmoud Gomaa, Hassan Ahmed Hashem, Amira Elhoufey, Hamad Ghaleb Dailah, Rami A Metwally, Noran ElBazzar, Nevin Shalaby
{"title":"Impact of Prior Metformin Use on Stroke Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Updated Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Anas Elgenidy, Ahmed Yasser Shaban, Khaled Saad, Yasser Hamed, Ahmed Elhadi Rhab, Mohamed Khalafalla Darwish, Alaa Essam Kamal, Mohamed Salem Abdelkader, Hamza Anas Marzouk, Mohamed Mahmoud Gomaa, Hassan Ahmed Hashem, Amira Elhoufey, Hamad Ghaleb Dailah, Rami A Metwally, Noran ElBazzar, Nevin Shalaby","doi":"10.14740/jocmr6159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Metformin is a commonly prescribed oral hypoglycemic agent for diabetic patients. Its effect in reducing the incidence of stroke has already been proven. We aimed to explore the impact of prior metformin use on stroke outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify relevant studies involving stroke patients with a history of metformin use and comparing them to non-metformin users. We analyzed the following outcomes: modified Rankin Scale (mRS), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), mortality, or length of hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven studies, with 13,825 participants, were included. The metformin group showed higher favorable mRS 0 - 2 than the non-metformin group (risk ratio (RR) = 1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09 - 1.19, P value < 0.01). Also, significantly lower mortality rates were seen in the metformin group (RR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.46 - 0.63, P value ≤ 0.01). NIHSS at discharge was lower in the metformin group than the non-metformin group (mean difference (MD) = -0.46, 95% CI: -0.82 - -0.11, P value < 0.01). The mRS 3 - 6 indicates less favorable outcomes were higher in the non-metformin group (RR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.77 - 0.93). At the same time, NIHSS at admission showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups. These results indicate that metformin has a beneficial impact on the severity of stroke.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pre-stroke metformin therapy is associated with better post-stroke clinical outcomes and lower mortality rates. These results highlight the potential neuroprotective role of metformin and emphasize its role as an adjunctive treatment in stroke management. Further research is required to understand its mechanism better.</p>","PeriodicalId":94329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical medicine research","volume":"17 2","pages":"76-88"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11835556/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical medicine research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr6159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:二甲双胍是糖尿病患者常用的口服降糖药。其降低中风发病率的效果已得到证实。我们旨在探讨既往服用二甲双胍对中风预后的影响:方法:我们在 Web of Science、PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane Library 中进行了检索,以确定涉及有二甲双胍使用史的中风患者的相关研究,并将其与非二甲双胍使用者进行比较。我们分析了以下结果:改良Rankin量表(mRS)、美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)、死亡率或住院时间:结果:共纳入 11 项研究,13825 名参与者。二甲双胍组的 mRS 0 - 2 良好率高于非二甲双胍组(风险比 (RR) = 1.14,95% 置信区间 (CI):1.09 - 1.19,P 值 < 0.01)。此外,二甲双胍组的死亡率也明显较低(RR = 0.54,95% CI:0.46 - 0.63,P 值≤ 0.01)。二甲双胍组出院时的 NIHSS 低于非二甲双胍组(平均差 (MD) = -0.46,95% CI:-0.82 --0.11,P 值<0.01)。非二甲双胍组患者的 mRS 3 - 6 表示较差的结果(RR = 0.85,95% CI:0.77 - 0.93)。同时,入院时的 NIHSS 在两组间无统计学差异。这些结果表明,二甲双胍对脑卒中的严重程度有有益影响:结论:卒中前服用二甲双胍可改善卒中后的临床预后,降低死亡率。这些结果突显了二甲双胍潜在的神经保护作用,并强调了其在中风治疗中的辅助作用。要更好地了解其作用机制,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Prior Metformin Use on Stroke Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Updated Meta-Analysis.

Background: Metformin is a commonly prescribed oral hypoglycemic agent for diabetic patients. Its effect in reducing the incidence of stroke has already been proven. We aimed to explore the impact of prior metformin use on stroke outcomes.

Methods: The Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify relevant studies involving stroke patients with a history of metformin use and comparing them to non-metformin users. We analyzed the following outcomes: modified Rankin Scale (mRS), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), mortality, or length of hospitalization.

Results: Eleven studies, with 13,825 participants, were included. The metformin group showed higher favorable mRS 0 - 2 than the non-metformin group (risk ratio (RR) = 1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09 - 1.19, P value < 0.01). Also, significantly lower mortality rates were seen in the metformin group (RR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.46 - 0.63, P value ≤ 0.01). NIHSS at discharge was lower in the metformin group than the non-metformin group (mean difference (MD) = -0.46, 95% CI: -0.82 - -0.11, P value < 0.01). The mRS 3 - 6 indicates less favorable outcomes were higher in the non-metformin group (RR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.77 - 0.93). At the same time, NIHSS at admission showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups. These results indicate that metformin has a beneficial impact on the severity of stroke.

Conclusions: Pre-stroke metformin therapy is associated with better post-stroke clinical outcomes and lower mortality rates. These results highlight the potential neuroprotective role of metformin and emphasize its role as an adjunctive treatment in stroke management. Further research is required to understand its mechanism better.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信