美国医疗保险计划对药物基因检测的医疗政策决定。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jai N Patel, Lena Chaihorsky, Olivia M Dong, Christine Y Lu, Chad Moretz, Emily Reese, Wrenda Teeple, Benjamin Brown, Sara Rogers
{"title":"美国医疗保险计划对药物基因检测的医疗政策决定。","authors":"Jai N Patel, Lena Chaihorsky, Olivia M Dong, Christine Y Lu, Chad Moretz, Emily Reese, Wrenda Teeple, Benjamin Brown, Sara Rogers","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2025.89683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate medical policy determinations for pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing for 65 clinically relevant drug-gene pairs and evidence cited to support determinations across major US health plans and laboratory benefit managers (LBMs).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Landscape analysis of available PGx medical policies to determine coverage status of certain drug-gene pairs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PGx medical policies as of February 1, 2024, were ascertained through Policy Reporter for top national insurers, LBMs, and the Palmetto GBA Molecular Diagnostic Services (MolDX) Program, which determines whether a molecular diagnostic test is covered by Medicare. Data elements included date of last policy update, coverage status for each drug-gene pair, and evidence cited for or against coverage. A drug-gene pair was considered covered if the policy indicated that a PGx test was deemed medically necessary and/or meets coverage criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Policies from 8 insurers, 3 LBMs, and MolDX were available and reviewed. MolDX covered all 65 individual drug-gene pairs, followed by Avalon Healthcare Solutions (n = 50) and UnitedHealthcare (n = 45); these 3 also covered multigene panels. Eight policies covered 10 or fewer drug-gene pairs. HLA-B*57:01 testing prior to abacavir initiation and HLA-B*15:02 testing prior to carbamazepine initiation were covered across all policies. Drug-gene pairs with Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines and/or included in the FDA's Table of Pharmacogenetic Associations Section 1 were more commonly covered. Society guidelines were the most frequently cited evidence (413 times), and cost-effectiveness studies were infrequently cited (43 times).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found significant variability in medical policy determinations and evidence cited for clinically relevant PGx tests among major US health insurers and LBMs. A collaborative effort between payers and the PGx community to standardize evidence evaluation may lead to more consistent coverage and improve patient access to PGx tests meeting evidence requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":"31 2","pages":"e47-e55"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medical policy determinations for pharmacogenetic tests among US health plans.\",\"authors\":\"Jai N Patel, Lena Chaihorsky, Olivia M Dong, Christine Y Lu, Chad Moretz, Emily Reese, Wrenda Teeple, Benjamin Brown, Sara Rogers\",\"doi\":\"10.37765/ajmc.2025.89683\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate medical policy determinations for pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing for 65 clinically relevant drug-gene pairs and evidence cited to support determinations across major US health plans and laboratory benefit managers (LBMs).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Landscape analysis of available PGx medical policies to determine coverage status of certain drug-gene pairs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PGx medical policies as of February 1, 2024, were ascertained through Policy Reporter for top national insurers, LBMs, and the Palmetto GBA Molecular Diagnostic Services (MolDX) Program, which determines whether a molecular diagnostic test is covered by Medicare. Data elements included date of last policy update, coverage status for each drug-gene pair, and evidence cited for or against coverage. A drug-gene pair was considered covered if the policy indicated that a PGx test was deemed medically necessary and/or meets coverage criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Policies from 8 insurers, 3 LBMs, and MolDX were available and reviewed. MolDX covered all 65 individual drug-gene pairs, followed by Avalon Healthcare Solutions (n = 50) and UnitedHealthcare (n = 45); these 3 also covered multigene panels. Eight policies covered 10 or fewer drug-gene pairs. HLA-B*57:01 testing prior to abacavir initiation and HLA-B*15:02 testing prior to carbamazepine initiation were covered across all policies. Drug-gene pairs with Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines and/or included in the FDA's Table of Pharmacogenetic Associations Section 1 were more commonly covered. Society guidelines were the most frequently cited evidence (413 times), and cost-effectiveness studies were infrequently cited (43 times).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found significant variability in medical policy determinations and evidence cited for clinically relevant PGx tests among major US health insurers and LBMs. A collaborative effort between payers and the PGx community to standardize evidence evaluation may lead to more consistent coverage and improve patient access to PGx tests meeting evidence requirements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Managed Care\",\"volume\":\"31 2\",\"pages\":\"e47-e55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Managed Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2025.89683\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2025.89683","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估65对临床相关药物基因对的药物遗传学(PGx)检测的医疗政策决定,并引用证据支持美国主要健康计划和实验室福利管理(lbm)的决定。研究设计:对现有的PGx医疗政策进行景观分析,以确定某些药物基因对的覆盖状况。方法:截至2024年2月1日,PGx医疗政策通过政策报告确定了顶级国家保险公司,lbm和Palmetto GBA分子诊断服务(MolDX)计划,该计划确定了分子诊断测试是否被医疗保险覆盖。数据元素包括上次政策更新的日期、每个药物基因对的覆盖状态以及支持或反对覆盖的证据。如果政策表明PGx测试被认为是医学上必要的和/或符合覆盖标准,则认为药物基因对被覆盖。结果:来自8家保险公司、3家lbm和MolDX的保单可供查阅。MolDX涵盖了所有65对药物基因对,其次是Avalon Healthcare Solutions (n = 50)和UnitedHealthcare (n = 45);这3个也涵盖了多基因组。8项政策涵盖了10对或更少的药物基因对。所有政策都涵盖了阿巴卡韦起始前的HLA-B*57:01检测和卡马西平起始前的HLA-B*15:02检测。与临床药理学实施联盟指南和/或列入FDA药理学关联表第1节的药物基因对更常被涵盖。社会指南是最常被引用的证据(413次),而成本效益研究很少被引用(43次)。结论:我们发现美国主要健康保险公司和lbm在医疗政策决定和临床相关PGx测试中引用的证据方面存在显著差异。支付方和PGx社区之间的协作努力将证据评估标准化,可能会导致更一致的覆盖范围,并改善患者获得符合证据要求的PGx检测的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Medical policy determinations for pharmacogenetic tests among US health plans.

Objectives: To evaluate medical policy determinations for pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing for 65 clinically relevant drug-gene pairs and evidence cited to support determinations across major US health plans and laboratory benefit managers (LBMs).

Study design: Landscape analysis of available PGx medical policies to determine coverage status of certain drug-gene pairs.

Methods: PGx medical policies as of February 1, 2024, were ascertained through Policy Reporter for top national insurers, LBMs, and the Palmetto GBA Molecular Diagnostic Services (MolDX) Program, which determines whether a molecular diagnostic test is covered by Medicare. Data elements included date of last policy update, coverage status for each drug-gene pair, and evidence cited for or against coverage. A drug-gene pair was considered covered if the policy indicated that a PGx test was deemed medically necessary and/or meets coverage criteria.

Results: Policies from 8 insurers, 3 LBMs, and MolDX were available and reviewed. MolDX covered all 65 individual drug-gene pairs, followed by Avalon Healthcare Solutions (n = 50) and UnitedHealthcare (n = 45); these 3 also covered multigene panels. Eight policies covered 10 or fewer drug-gene pairs. HLA-B*57:01 testing prior to abacavir initiation and HLA-B*15:02 testing prior to carbamazepine initiation were covered across all policies. Drug-gene pairs with Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines and/or included in the FDA's Table of Pharmacogenetic Associations Section 1 were more commonly covered. Society guidelines were the most frequently cited evidence (413 times), and cost-effectiveness studies were infrequently cited (43 times).

Conclusions: We found significant variability in medical policy determinations and evidence cited for clinically relevant PGx tests among major US health insurers and LBMs. A collaborative effort between payers and the PGx community to standardize evidence evaluation may lead to more consistent coverage and improve patient access to PGx tests meeting evidence requirements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Managed Care
American Journal of Managed Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信