初步研制一种测量病人心理安全的量表。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Paul J Hershberger, Timothy N Crawford, Angie Castle, Sarah K Hiett, Roselle Bea P Almazan, Khadijah C Collins, Jared M Burkert, David G Fields, Sarah G Yu, Katharine Conway
{"title":"初步研制一种测量病人心理安全的量表。","authors":"Paul J Hershberger, Timothy N Crawford, Angie Castle, Sarah K Hiett, Roselle Bea P Almazan, Khadijah C Collins, Jared M Burkert, David G Fields, Sarah G Yu, Katharine Conway","doi":"10.3122/jabfm.2023.230465R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Psychological safety is the perception that it is safe to express oneself without fear of ridicule. Better patient outcomes are associated with health care teams that experience psychological safety. However, the psychological safety of the patient has largely been ignored, even though it may affect patient forthrightness and adherence. We developed an initial Patient Psychological Safety Scale (PPSS) to assess patients' experience of psychological safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirteen items modified from team-focused measures of psychological safety comprised the initial version of the PPSS. To explore criterion validity, 8 items pertaining to nondisclosure of important information were used. A convenience sample of 100 patients from 4 primary care settings completed a survey comprised of the PPSS and nondisclosure questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated that the 13-item PPSS did not measure 1 factor. A subsequent exploratory factor analysis (EFA) identified 2 factors. A second CFA was conducted on a modified 9-item PPSS representing the 2 factors and retaining items with a factor loading of 0.40 or higher, and the results indicated a good fit. Internal reliability and validity for factors 1 (relationship comfort) (α = 0.95) and 2 (belonging) (α = 0.88) were strong. Although few respondents endorsed nondisclosure, there was a significant association between lower relationship comfort and nondisclosure of disagreement with clinician recommendation (median difference = 5.0, <i>P</i> = .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients' experience of psychological safety may affect clinical outcomes. The PPSS provides a starting point for further study of this potentially important variable.</p>","PeriodicalId":50018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","volume":"37 5","pages":"809-815"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Initial Development of a Scale to Measure Patient Psychological Safety.\",\"authors\":\"Paul J Hershberger, Timothy N Crawford, Angie Castle, Sarah K Hiett, Roselle Bea P Almazan, Khadijah C Collins, Jared M Burkert, David G Fields, Sarah G Yu, Katharine Conway\",\"doi\":\"10.3122/jabfm.2023.230465R1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Psychological safety is the perception that it is safe to express oneself without fear of ridicule. Better patient outcomes are associated with health care teams that experience psychological safety. However, the psychological safety of the patient has largely been ignored, even though it may affect patient forthrightness and adherence. We developed an initial Patient Psychological Safety Scale (PPSS) to assess patients' experience of psychological safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirteen items modified from team-focused measures of psychological safety comprised the initial version of the PPSS. To explore criterion validity, 8 items pertaining to nondisclosure of important information were used. A convenience sample of 100 patients from 4 primary care settings completed a survey comprised of the PPSS and nondisclosure questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated that the 13-item PPSS did not measure 1 factor. A subsequent exploratory factor analysis (EFA) identified 2 factors. A second CFA was conducted on a modified 9-item PPSS representing the 2 factors and retaining items with a factor loading of 0.40 or higher, and the results indicated a good fit. Internal reliability and validity for factors 1 (relationship comfort) (α = 0.95) and 2 (belonging) (α = 0.88) were strong. Although few respondents endorsed nondisclosure, there was a significant association between lower relationship comfort and nondisclosure of disagreement with clinician recommendation (median difference = 5.0, <i>P</i> = .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients' experience of psychological safety may affect clinical outcomes. The PPSS provides a starting point for further study of this potentially important variable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine\",\"volume\":\"37 5\",\"pages\":\"809-815\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2023.230465R1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2023.230465R1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心理安全是一种感觉,认为可以安全地表达自己,而不用担心被嘲笑。有心理安全感的医疗团队会给患者带来更好的治疗效果。然而,患者的心理安全在很大程度上被忽视了,即使它可能影响患者的直率和依从性。我们开发了一个初步的病人心理安全量表(PPSS)来评估病人的心理安全体验。方法:从以团队为中心的心理安全测量中修改的13个项目组成了初始版本的PPSS。为了探讨标准效度,使用了8个与重要信息不披露有关的项目。来自4个初级保健机构的100名患者的方便样本完成了由PPSS和保密问题组成的调查。结果:验证性因子分析(CFA)表明,13项PPSS未测量1个因子。随后的探索性因素分析(EFA)确定了2个因素。采用因子负荷为0.40及以上的修正后的9题PPSS进行二次检验,结果吻合良好。因子1(关系舒适度)和因子2(归属感)的内信度和效度均较强(α = 0.95)。虽然很少有受访者支持不公开,但较低的关系舒适度与不公开不同意临床医生建议之间存在显著关联(中位数差异= 5.0,P = 0.001)。结论:患者的心理安全体验可能影响临床结果。PPSS为进一步研究这个潜在的重要变量提供了一个起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Initial Development of a Scale to Measure Patient Psychological Safety.

Introduction: Psychological safety is the perception that it is safe to express oneself without fear of ridicule. Better patient outcomes are associated with health care teams that experience psychological safety. However, the psychological safety of the patient has largely been ignored, even though it may affect patient forthrightness and adherence. We developed an initial Patient Psychological Safety Scale (PPSS) to assess patients' experience of psychological safety.

Methods: Thirteen items modified from team-focused measures of psychological safety comprised the initial version of the PPSS. To explore criterion validity, 8 items pertaining to nondisclosure of important information were used. A convenience sample of 100 patients from 4 primary care settings completed a survey comprised of the PPSS and nondisclosure questions.

Results: A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated that the 13-item PPSS did not measure 1 factor. A subsequent exploratory factor analysis (EFA) identified 2 factors. A second CFA was conducted on a modified 9-item PPSS representing the 2 factors and retaining items with a factor loading of 0.40 or higher, and the results indicated a good fit. Internal reliability and validity for factors 1 (relationship comfort) (α = 0.95) and 2 (belonging) (α = 0.88) were strong. Although few respondents endorsed nondisclosure, there was a significant association between lower relationship comfort and nondisclosure of disagreement with clinician recommendation (median difference = 5.0, P = .001).

Conclusions: Patients' experience of psychological safety may affect clinical outcomes. The PPSS provides a starting point for further study of this potentially important variable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1988, the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine ( JABFM ) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM). Believing that the public and scientific communities are best served by open access to information, JABFM makes its articles available free of charge and without registration at www.jabfm.org. JABFM is indexed by Medline, Index Medicus, and other services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信