经右颈外静脉置管与经右头臂静脉置管对套管导管丢失患者通畅率的比较。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Renal Failure Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1080/0886022X.2025.2457516
Jun Yin, Fengping Wang
{"title":"经右颈外静脉置管与经右头臂静脉置管对套管导管丢失患者通畅率的比较。","authors":"Jun Yin, Fengping Wang","doi":"10.1080/0886022X.2025.2457516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study is to compare the patency rates of catheter placement <i>via</i> cannulation of right external jugular vein (EJV) versus the right brachiocephalic (BCV) in patients experiencing tunneled-cuffed catheter (TCC) loss.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 30 patients admitted to our department due to TCC loss. Among them, 11 patients underwent catheter reinsertion <i>via</i> the right EJV, while 19 patients underwent catheter reinsertion <i>via</i> the right BCV. We collected and compared the data of these patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both groups of patients, there were no cases of pneumothorax, severe adjacent artery injury, or mediastinal hematoma observed. The one-year primary patency rates of the catheters in the EVJ group and the BCV group were 54.55% and 36.84%, and the primary patency rates of two years were found to be 27.27% and 21.05% respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the patency rates at both 1 and 2 years (<i>p</i> = 0.55, <i>p</i> = 0.71).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the face of patients experiencing TCC loss, the practice of replacing dialysis catheters via the right EJV and right BCV routes emerges as a safe and efficacious alternative strategy. Notably, no difference in catheter patency rates is observed between these divergent access routes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20839,"journal":{"name":"Renal Failure","volume":"47 1","pages":"2457516"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11849010/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the patency rates of catheter placement <i>via</i> the right external jugular vein route versus the right brachiocephalic vein route in patients experiencing tunneled-cuffed catheter loss.\",\"authors\":\"Jun Yin, Fengping Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0886022X.2025.2457516\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study is to compare the patency rates of catheter placement <i>via</i> cannulation of right external jugular vein (EJV) versus the right brachiocephalic (BCV) in patients experiencing tunneled-cuffed catheter (TCC) loss.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 30 patients admitted to our department due to TCC loss. Among them, 11 patients underwent catheter reinsertion <i>via</i> the right EJV, while 19 patients underwent catheter reinsertion <i>via</i> the right BCV. We collected and compared the data of these patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both groups of patients, there were no cases of pneumothorax, severe adjacent artery injury, or mediastinal hematoma observed. The one-year primary patency rates of the catheters in the EVJ group and the BCV group were 54.55% and 36.84%, and the primary patency rates of two years were found to be 27.27% and 21.05% respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the patency rates at both 1 and 2 years (<i>p</i> = 0.55, <i>p</i> = 0.71).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the face of patients experiencing TCC loss, the practice of replacing dialysis catheters via the right EJV and right BCV routes emerges as a safe and efficacious alternative strategy. Notably, no difference in catheter patency rates is observed between these divergent access routes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renal Failure\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"2457516\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11849010/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renal Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2025.2457516\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renal Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2025.2457516","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:本研究的目的是比较通过右颈外静脉(EJV)置管与右头臂静脉(BCV)置管在隧道套管导管(TCC)丢失患者中的通畅率。方法:对30例因TCC丢失而入院的患者进行回顾性分析。其中11例患者经右EJV重新置管,19例患者经右BCV重新置管。我们收集并比较了这些患者的资料。结果:两组患者均无气胸、严重邻近动脉损伤、纵隔血肿。EVJ组和BCV组1年初诊通畅率分别为54.55%和36.84%,2年初诊通畅率分别为27.27%和21.05%。1年和2年通畅率差异无统计学意义(p = 0.55, p = 0.71)。结论:面对TCC丢失的患者,通过右侧EJV和右侧BCV路径更换透析导管的做法是一种安全有效的替代策略。值得注意的是,在这些不同的通路之间,导管通畅率没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the patency rates of catheter placement via the right external jugular vein route versus the right brachiocephalic vein route in patients experiencing tunneled-cuffed catheter loss.

Introduction: The aim of this study is to compare the patency rates of catheter placement via cannulation of right external jugular vein (EJV) versus the right brachiocephalic (BCV) in patients experiencing tunneled-cuffed catheter (TCC) loss.

Method: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 30 patients admitted to our department due to TCC loss. Among them, 11 patients underwent catheter reinsertion via the right EJV, while 19 patients underwent catheter reinsertion via the right BCV. We collected and compared the data of these patients.

Results: In both groups of patients, there were no cases of pneumothorax, severe adjacent artery injury, or mediastinal hematoma observed. The one-year primary patency rates of the catheters in the EVJ group and the BCV group were 54.55% and 36.84%, and the primary patency rates of two years were found to be 27.27% and 21.05% respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the patency rates at both 1 and 2 years (p = 0.55, p = 0.71).

Conclusion: In the face of patients experiencing TCC loss, the practice of replacing dialysis catheters via the right EJV and right BCV routes emerges as a safe and efficacious alternative strategy. Notably, no difference in catheter patency rates is observed between these divergent access routes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Renal Failure
Renal Failure 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
13.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Renal Failure primarily concentrates on acute renal injury and its consequence, but also addresses advances in the fields of chronic renal failure, hypertension, and renal transplantation. Bringing together both clinical and experimental aspects of renal failure, this publication presents timely, practical information on pathology and pathophysiology of acute renal failure; nephrotoxicity of drugs and other substances; prevention, treatment, and therapy of renal failure; renal failure in association with transplantation, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信