导管消融改善心房纤颤介导的心肌病的通气效率。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Nikhil Ahluwalia, David Bruce, Ashley Ashdown, Fabrizio Focacci, Hakam Abbass, Shohreh Honarbakhsh, Anthony Chow, Mehul Dhinoja, Ross J Hunter, Steffen Petersen, Guy Lloyd, Richard J Schilling
{"title":"导管消融改善心房纤颤介导的心肌病的通气效率。","authors":"Nikhil Ahluwalia, David Bruce, Ashley Ashdown, Fabrizio Focacci, Hakam Abbass, Shohreh Honarbakhsh, Anthony Chow, Mehul Dhinoja, Ross J Hunter, Steffen Petersen, Guy Lloyd, Richard J Schilling","doi":"10.1111/jce.16606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exercise Oscillatory Ventilation (EOV) and a steep ventilatory efficiency (VE/VCO2) slope are features of ventilatory inefficiency on cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), both associated with poor prognosis in patients with heart failure (HF). The prevalence in patients with co-existent atrial fibrillation (AF) and the impact of catheter ablation (CA) is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To characterize ventilatory inefficiency in patients with persistent AF and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (LVSD) and assess the impact of CA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with persistent AF and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) < 50% undergoing first-time CA were prospectively enrolled. Echocardiography and CPET were performed at baseline and 6 months post-CA. EOV was defined using the Kremser-Corrà criteria, and VE/VCO2 slope gradient > 30 was considered abnormal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 53 participants were enrolled (mean LVEF of 34 ± 9%). A total of 10 (19.2%) exhibited EOV at baseline. These patients had larger indexed left atrial (41.6 ± 13.1 mL/m<sup>2</sup> vs. 33.3 ± 9.3 mL/m<sup>2</sup>, p = 0.03) and ventricular volumes [65.7 mL/m<sup>2</sup> (57.1, 89.0) vs. 46.7 mL/m<sup>2</sup> (39.8, 61.4), p = 0.03]. The partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (P<sub>ET</sub>CO<sub>2</sub>) at peak exercise increased (33.7 ± 6.1 mmHg to 41.2 ± 5.8 mmHg, p < 0.001) and correlated with improvement in HF symptoms (p = -0.003) and objective HF markers. A total of 25 (48.1%) had an abnormal VE/VCO2 gradient. The EOV pattern resolved in eight (80%) participants due to a reduction in EOV burden (71.1 ± 11.9% vs. 48.8 ± 14.8%, p = 0.006) and the component amplitude of minute ventilation cycles (2.6 L/min (2.5,3.2) vs 2.2 L/min (1.8,2.6), p = 0.028). Fewer patients had an abnormal VE/VCO2 gradient after CA [25 (48.1%) vs. 16 (34.0%), p = 0.004].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ventilatory inefficiency is common in patients with AF and LVSD. CA improves both EOV and VE/VCO2 in AF-induced cardiomyopathy. Improvement in P<sub>ET</sub>CO<sub>2</sub> is also seen and correlates with HF symptom burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Catheter Ablation Improves Ventilatory Efficiency in Atrial Fibrillation-Mediated Cardiomyopathy.\",\"authors\":\"Nikhil Ahluwalia, David Bruce, Ashley Ashdown, Fabrizio Focacci, Hakam Abbass, Shohreh Honarbakhsh, Anthony Chow, Mehul Dhinoja, Ross J Hunter, Steffen Petersen, Guy Lloyd, Richard J Schilling\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jce.16606\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exercise Oscillatory Ventilation (EOV) and a steep ventilatory efficiency (VE/VCO2) slope are features of ventilatory inefficiency on cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), both associated with poor prognosis in patients with heart failure (HF). The prevalence in patients with co-existent atrial fibrillation (AF) and the impact of catheter ablation (CA) is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To characterize ventilatory inefficiency in patients with persistent AF and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (LVSD) and assess the impact of CA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with persistent AF and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) < 50% undergoing first-time CA were prospectively enrolled. Echocardiography and CPET were performed at baseline and 6 months post-CA. EOV was defined using the Kremser-Corrà criteria, and VE/VCO2 slope gradient > 30 was considered abnormal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 53 participants were enrolled (mean LVEF of 34 ± 9%). A total of 10 (19.2%) exhibited EOV at baseline. These patients had larger indexed left atrial (41.6 ± 13.1 mL/m<sup>2</sup> vs. 33.3 ± 9.3 mL/m<sup>2</sup>, p = 0.03) and ventricular volumes [65.7 mL/m<sup>2</sup> (57.1, 89.0) vs. 46.7 mL/m<sup>2</sup> (39.8, 61.4), p = 0.03]. The partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (P<sub>ET</sub>CO<sub>2</sub>) at peak exercise increased (33.7 ± 6.1 mmHg to 41.2 ± 5.8 mmHg, p < 0.001) and correlated with improvement in HF symptoms (p = -0.003) and objective HF markers. A total of 25 (48.1%) had an abnormal VE/VCO2 gradient. The EOV pattern resolved in eight (80%) participants due to a reduction in EOV burden (71.1 ± 11.9% vs. 48.8 ± 14.8%, p = 0.006) and the component amplitude of minute ventilation cycles (2.6 L/min (2.5,3.2) vs 2.2 L/min (1.8,2.6), p = 0.028). Fewer patients had an abnormal VE/VCO2 gradient after CA [25 (48.1%) vs. 16 (34.0%), p = 0.004].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ventilatory inefficiency is common in patients with AF and LVSD. CA improves both EOV and VE/VCO2 in AF-induced cardiomyopathy. Improvement in P<sub>ET</sub>CO<sub>2</sub> is also seen and correlates with HF symptom burden.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16606\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16606","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:运动振荡通气(EOV)和较大的通气效率(VE/VCO2)斜率是心肺运动试验(CPET)通气效率低下的特征,两者都与心力衰竭(HF)患者的预后不良有关。并发心房颤动(AF)患者的患病率和导管消融(CA)的影响尚不清楚。目的:探讨持续性房颤合并左室收缩功能不全(LVSD)患者通气效率低下的特征,并评估ca的影响。方法:持续性房颤合并左室射血分数(LVEF) 30为异常。结果:共纳入53例受试者(平均LVEF为34±9%)。共有10例(19.2%)在基线时表现为EOV。这些患者的左心房指数(41.6±13.1 mL/m2 vs. 33.3±9.3 mL/m2, p = 0.03)和心室容积较大[65.7 mL/m2 (57.1, 89.0) vs. 46.7 mL/m2 (39.8, 61.4), p = 0.03]。运动高峰时潮末二氧化碳分压(PETCO2)升高(33.7±6.1 mmHg)至41.2±5.8 mmHg, p结论:房颤合并LVSD患者通气效率低下。CA可改善af诱导心肌病患者的EOV和VE/VCO2。PETCO2的改善也与HF症状负担相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Catheter Ablation Improves Ventilatory Efficiency in Atrial Fibrillation-Mediated Cardiomyopathy.

Background: Exercise Oscillatory Ventilation (EOV) and a steep ventilatory efficiency (VE/VCO2) slope are features of ventilatory inefficiency on cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), both associated with poor prognosis in patients with heart failure (HF). The prevalence in patients with co-existent atrial fibrillation (AF) and the impact of catheter ablation (CA) is unknown.

Objectives: To characterize ventilatory inefficiency in patients with persistent AF and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (LVSD) and assess the impact of CA.

Methods: Patients with persistent AF and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) < 50% undergoing first-time CA were prospectively enrolled. Echocardiography and CPET were performed at baseline and 6 months post-CA. EOV was defined using the Kremser-Corrà criteria, and VE/VCO2 slope gradient > 30 was considered abnormal.

Results: A total of 53 participants were enrolled (mean LVEF of 34 ± 9%). A total of 10 (19.2%) exhibited EOV at baseline. These patients had larger indexed left atrial (41.6 ± 13.1 mL/m2 vs. 33.3 ± 9.3 mL/m2, p = 0.03) and ventricular volumes [65.7 mL/m2 (57.1, 89.0) vs. 46.7 mL/m2 (39.8, 61.4), p = 0.03]. The partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (PETCO2) at peak exercise increased (33.7 ± 6.1 mmHg to 41.2 ± 5.8 mmHg, p < 0.001) and correlated with improvement in HF symptoms (p = -0.003) and objective HF markers. A total of 25 (48.1%) had an abnormal VE/VCO2 gradient. The EOV pattern resolved in eight (80%) participants due to a reduction in EOV burden (71.1 ± 11.9% vs. 48.8 ± 14.8%, p = 0.006) and the component amplitude of minute ventilation cycles (2.6 L/min (2.5,3.2) vs 2.2 L/min (1.8,2.6), p = 0.028). Fewer patients had an abnormal VE/VCO2 gradient after CA [25 (48.1%) vs. 16 (34.0%), p = 0.004].

Conclusions: Ventilatory inefficiency is common in patients with AF and LVSD. CA improves both EOV and VE/VCO2 in AF-induced cardiomyopathy. Improvement in PETCO2 is also seen and correlates with HF symptom burden.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.80%
发文量
433
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信