Yinghao Li, Lei Yao, Yizhou Huang, Long Pang, Chunsen Zhang, Tao Li, Duan Wang, Kai Zhou, Jian Li, Xin Tang
{"title":"瘦素增强M1巨噬细胞极化,损害肌腱-骨修复大鼠模型","authors":"Yinghao Li, Lei Yao, Yizhou Huang, Long Pang, Chunsen Zhang, Tao Li, Duan Wang, Kai Zhou, Jian Li, Xin Tang","doi":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rotator cuff tears are common, affecting more than 60% of individuals older than 80 years, and they have been implicated in 70% of patients with shoulder pain. M1 polarization-related inflammation has been reported to be associated with poor healing outcomes of rotator cuff injury, and leptin, an adipokine, has been reported to be a potential activator of inflammation. However, whether leptin affects rotator cuff repair remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Questions/purposes: </strong>Using in vitro cell experiments and an in vivo rat rotator cuff tear model, we therefore asked: (1) Does leptin promote the M1 polarization of macrophages in vitro and in vivo? (2) Does leptin impair biomechanical strength, the histologic structure of the tendon-bone interface, bone mineral density (BMD), or gait in the rotator cuff tear scenario? (3) Does leptin promote M1 polarization by upregulating the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) pathway?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The impact of leptin on M1 macrophage polarization in vitro was determined by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), the Western blot test, and immunofluorescence staining. The effect of leptin on tendon-bone healing was assessed in an in vivo rat rotator cuff tear model by comparing a leptin group with a suture group in terms of gait, biomechanical tensile strength, the histologic structure of the tendon-bone interface, and BMD. In the in vivo experiments, 8-week-old male Sprague Dawley rats were used, adapting a previously developed rat rotator cuff tear model. The supraspinatus tendon was resected from the greater tuberosity bilaterally, and then the tendon was secured to its anatomical footprint using the transosseous single-row technique. In total, 30 rats were randomized into two groups (suture, leptin) by drawing lots (15 rats in each group). They were assessed at 2, 4, and 8 weeks after the surgery. In the suture group, 100 µL of normal saline was injected into the subacromial space after the deltoid muscle was restitched to the original position. In the leptin group, 100 µL of leptin solution (200 ng/mL) was injected into the subacromial space after the deltoid muscle was restitched to the original position. Biomechanical properties including maximal failure load, stiffness, and tensile failure stress were determined to assess the biomechanical strength at 4 and 8 weeks after the surgery. Histologic staining was conducted to compare the structure of the tendon-bone interface between treatment groups. Micro-MRI and micro-CT assessments were conducted to compare the overall healing outcome and BMD between treatment groups. Gait analysis was conducted to compare the stride length and strength between treatment groups. M1 macrophage polarization in vivo at the tendon-bone interface was assessed by immunofluorescence staining. Finally, to explore the underlying mechanism of the effects of leptin, Necrostatin-1 (Nec-1) was used to block the TNF signaling pathway in the in vitro macrophage study, and RT-PCR and Western blot were used to explore the underlying mechanism.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Leptin enhanced LPS-induced M1 polarization of macrophages in vitro, showing increased gene expression of CD86, Nos2, and TNF-α as well as increased protein expression of CD86, TNF-α, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and inducible NO synthase (iNOS). The in vivo polarization showed that the M1 polarization of macrophages at the tendon-bone interface was promoted. At 2 weeks postoperatively, there were more M1 cells in the leptin group (53 ± 5 versus 77 ± 8, mean difference 24 [95% confidence interval (CI) 11 to 37]; p = 0.002), although the proportion of M1 cells (ratio of the number of M1 cells to the total number of macrophages) was not higher (18.6% ± 2.9% versus 21.5% ± 1.7%, mean difference 2.9% [95% CI -2.8% to 8.7%]; p = 0.36). At 4 weeks postoperatively, the leptin group exhibited more M1 cells (31 ± 4 versus 50 ± 6, mean difference 19 [95% CI 6 to 32]; p = 0.008) and at a higher proportion (16.4% ± 2.6% versus 23.0% ± 3.0%, mean difference 6.6% [95% CI 0.8% to 12.4%]; p = 0.03). The in vivo experiments showed that leptin impaired tendon-bone healing. At 4 weeks postoperatively, the biomechanical properties of both groups were not different in terms of maximal failure load (12.7 ± 1.6 N versus 12.4 ± 1.8 N, mean difference -0.3 N [95% CI -2.6 to 1.8]; p = 0.91), stiffness (5.1 ± 0.7 N/mm versus 4.6 ± 0.8 N/mm, mean difference -0.5 N/mm [95% CI -1.3 to 0.5]; p = 0.44), and tensile failure stress (2.0 ± 0.3 N/mm 2 versus 2.0 ± 0.3 N/mm 2 , mean difference 0.0 N/mm 2 [95% CI -0.4 to 0.4]; p = 0.99). At 8 weeks postoperatively, the leptin group showed worse maximal failure load (17.6 ± 1.4 N versus 14.1 ± 1.4 N, mean difference -3.5 N [95% CI -5.7 to -1.3]; p = 0.002), stiffness (7.0 ± 0.6 N/mm versus 5.2 ± 0.6 N/mm, mean difference -1.8 N/mm [95% CI -2.7 to -0.9]; p < 0.001), and tensile failure stress (3.4 ± 0.3 N/mm 2 versus 2.8 ± 0.4 N/mm 2 , mean difference -0.6 N/mm 2 [95% CI -1.0 to -0.2]; p = 0.007). Results of histologic staining, image assessments, and gait analysis also demonstrated that leptin impaired the healing process. In vitro experiments showed that leptin upregulated the gene expression of molecules in the TNF pathway, including CCL2 and receptor-interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1), and M1 markers, such as TNF-α, CD86, and Nos2; the addition of Nec-1 neutralized the effect of leptin on macrophage polarization, reducing the expression of M1 markers, including TNF-α, CD86, and Nos2, and blocking the TNF signaling pathway, including CCL2 and RIPK. The protein expression exhibited similar trends.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the results of this study, leptin appears to impair tendon-bone healing in a rat model of rotator cuff tear, promote M1 macrophage polarization at the tendon-bone interface, and upregulate the TNF signaling pathway in macrophages to promote M1 polarization.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Obesity and fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff muscle are associated with poor healing of rotator cuff tears. In this study, the effect of leptin, an adipose factor, on tendon-bone healing and the underlying mechanism were explored. Future studies might focus on developing novel approaches to improve the tendon-bone healing in patients with obesity by targeting leptin or the TNF signaling pathway with the aid of biomaterials.</p>","PeriodicalId":10404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","volume":" ","pages":"939-951"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12014075/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leptin Enhances M1 Macrophage Polarization and Impairs Tendon-Bone Healing in Rotator Cuff Repair: A Rat Model.\",\"authors\":\"Yinghao Li, Lei Yao, Yizhou Huang, Long Pang, Chunsen Zhang, Tao Li, Duan Wang, Kai Zhou, Jian Li, Xin Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rotator cuff tears are common, affecting more than 60% of individuals older than 80 years, and they have been implicated in 70% of patients with shoulder pain. M1 polarization-related inflammation has been reported to be associated with poor healing outcomes of rotator cuff injury, and leptin, an adipokine, has been reported to be a potential activator of inflammation. However, whether leptin affects rotator cuff repair remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Questions/purposes: </strong>Using in vitro cell experiments and an in vivo rat rotator cuff tear model, we therefore asked: (1) Does leptin promote the M1 polarization of macrophages in vitro and in vivo? (2) Does leptin impair biomechanical strength, the histologic structure of the tendon-bone interface, bone mineral density (BMD), or gait in the rotator cuff tear scenario? (3) Does leptin promote M1 polarization by upregulating the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) pathway?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The impact of leptin on M1 macrophage polarization in vitro was determined by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), the Western blot test, and immunofluorescence staining. The effect of leptin on tendon-bone healing was assessed in an in vivo rat rotator cuff tear model by comparing a leptin group with a suture group in terms of gait, biomechanical tensile strength, the histologic structure of the tendon-bone interface, and BMD. In the in vivo experiments, 8-week-old male Sprague Dawley rats were used, adapting a previously developed rat rotator cuff tear model. The supraspinatus tendon was resected from the greater tuberosity bilaterally, and then the tendon was secured to its anatomical footprint using the transosseous single-row technique. In total, 30 rats were randomized into two groups (suture, leptin) by drawing lots (15 rats in each group). They were assessed at 2, 4, and 8 weeks after the surgery. In the suture group, 100 µL of normal saline was injected into the subacromial space after the deltoid muscle was restitched to the original position. In the leptin group, 100 µL of leptin solution (200 ng/mL) was injected into the subacromial space after the deltoid muscle was restitched to the original position. Biomechanical properties including maximal failure load, stiffness, and tensile failure stress were determined to assess the biomechanical strength at 4 and 8 weeks after the surgery. Histologic staining was conducted to compare the structure of the tendon-bone interface between treatment groups. Micro-MRI and micro-CT assessments were conducted to compare the overall healing outcome and BMD between treatment groups. Gait analysis was conducted to compare the stride length and strength between treatment groups. M1 macrophage polarization in vivo at the tendon-bone interface was assessed by immunofluorescence staining. Finally, to explore the underlying mechanism of the effects of leptin, Necrostatin-1 (Nec-1) was used to block the TNF signaling pathway in the in vitro macrophage study, and RT-PCR and Western blot were used to explore the underlying mechanism.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Leptin enhanced LPS-induced M1 polarization of macrophages in vitro, showing increased gene expression of CD86, Nos2, and TNF-α as well as increased protein expression of CD86, TNF-α, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and inducible NO synthase (iNOS). The in vivo polarization showed that the M1 polarization of macrophages at the tendon-bone interface was promoted. At 2 weeks postoperatively, there were more M1 cells in the leptin group (53 ± 5 versus 77 ± 8, mean difference 24 [95% confidence interval (CI) 11 to 37]; p = 0.002), although the proportion of M1 cells (ratio of the number of M1 cells to the total number of macrophages) was not higher (18.6% ± 2.9% versus 21.5% ± 1.7%, mean difference 2.9% [95% CI -2.8% to 8.7%]; p = 0.36). At 4 weeks postoperatively, the leptin group exhibited more M1 cells (31 ± 4 versus 50 ± 6, mean difference 19 [95% CI 6 to 32]; p = 0.008) and at a higher proportion (16.4% ± 2.6% versus 23.0% ± 3.0%, mean difference 6.6% [95% CI 0.8% to 12.4%]; p = 0.03). The in vivo experiments showed that leptin impaired tendon-bone healing. At 4 weeks postoperatively, the biomechanical properties of both groups were not different in terms of maximal failure load (12.7 ± 1.6 N versus 12.4 ± 1.8 N, mean difference -0.3 N [95% CI -2.6 to 1.8]; p = 0.91), stiffness (5.1 ± 0.7 N/mm versus 4.6 ± 0.8 N/mm, mean difference -0.5 N/mm [95% CI -1.3 to 0.5]; p = 0.44), and tensile failure stress (2.0 ± 0.3 N/mm 2 versus 2.0 ± 0.3 N/mm 2 , mean difference 0.0 N/mm 2 [95% CI -0.4 to 0.4]; p = 0.99). At 8 weeks postoperatively, the leptin group showed worse maximal failure load (17.6 ± 1.4 N versus 14.1 ± 1.4 N, mean difference -3.5 N [95% CI -5.7 to -1.3]; p = 0.002), stiffness (7.0 ± 0.6 N/mm versus 5.2 ± 0.6 N/mm, mean difference -1.8 N/mm [95% CI -2.7 to -0.9]; p < 0.001), and tensile failure stress (3.4 ± 0.3 N/mm 2 versus 2.8 ± 0.4 N/mm 2 , mean difference -0.6 N/mm 2 [95% CI -1.0 to -0.2]; p = 0.007). Results of histologic staining, image assessments, and gait analysis also demonstrated that leptin impaired the healing process. In vitro experiments showed that leptin upregulated the gene expression of molecules in the TNF pathway, including CCL2 and receptor-interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1), and M1 markers, such as TNF-α, CD86, and Nos2; the addition of Nec-1 neutralized the effect of leptin on macrophage polarization, reducing the expression of M1 markers, including TNF-α, CD86, and Nos2, and blocking the TNF signaling pathway, including CCL2 and RIPK. The protein expression exhibited similar trends.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the results of this study, leptin appears to impair tendon-bone healing in a rat model of rotator cuff tear, promote M1 macrophage polarization at the tendon-bone interface, and upregulate the TNF signaling pathway in macrophages to promote M1 polarization.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Obesity and fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff muscle are associated with poor healing of rotator cuff tears. In this study, the effect of leptin, an adipose factor, on tendon-bone healing and the underlying mechanism were explored. Future studies might focus on developing novel approaches to improve the tendon-bone healing in patients with obesity by targeting leptin or the TNF signaling pathway with the aid of biomaterials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"939-951\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12014075/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000003428\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000003428","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:肩袖撕裂很常见,影响超过60%的80岁以上老年人,70%的肩痛患者与肩袖撕裂有关。据报道,M1极化相关炎症与肩袖损伤愈合不良有关,而瘦素(一种脂肪因子)已被报道为炎症的潜在激活因子。然而,瘦素是否影响肩袖修复尚不清楚。问题/目的:通过体外细胞实验和体内大鼠肩袖撕裂模型,我们提出了以下问题:(1)瘦素是否在体内和体外促进巨噬细胞的M1极化?(2)在肩袖撕裂的情况下,瘦素是否会损害生物力学强度、肌腱-骨界面的组织学结构、骨密度(BMD)或步态?(3)瘦素是否通过上调肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)通路促进M1极化?方法:采用逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)、Western blot、免疫荧光染色检测瘦素对体外M1巨噬细胞极化的影响。在体内大鼠肩袖撕裂模型中,通过比较瘦素组和缝合组在步态、生物力学拉伸强度、肌腱-骨界面组织学结构和骨密度方面的影响,评估瘦素对肌腱-骨愈合的影响。在体内实验中,使用8周龄雄性Sprague Dawley大鼠,采用先前开发的大鼠肩袖撕裂模型。从双侧大结节切除冈上肌腱,然后使用经骨单排技术将肌腱固定在其解剖足迹上。将30只大鼠随机分为缝合组、瘦素组(每组15只)。分别于术后2周、4周和8周进行评估。缝合组在三角肌复位后,在肩峰下间隙注射生理盐水100µL。瘦素组在三角肌复位后,在肩峰下间隙注射100µL瘦素溶液(200 ng/mL)。在术后4周和8周测定生物力学特性,包括最大破坏载荷、刚度和拉伸破坏应力,以评估生物力学强度。采用组织学染色法比较各组肌腱-骨界面结构。通过微mri和微ct评估比较两组患者的整体愈合情况和骨密度。通过步态分析比较两组患者的步幅和力量。免疫荧光染色观察体内肌腱-骨界面M1巨噬细胞极化情况。最后,为探讨瘦素作用的潜在机制,在体外巨噬细胞研究中,采用坏死他汀-1 (nec1)阻断TNF信号通路,并采用RT-PCR和Western blot方法探讨其潜在机制。结果:瘦素增强lps诱导的巨噬细胞M1极化,CD86、Nos2、TNF-α基因表达增加,CD86、TNF-α、白细胞介素-6 (IL-6)蛋白表达增加,诱导NO合成酶(iNOS)表达增加。体内极化显示,巨噬细胞在肌腱-骨界面的M1极化被促进。术后2周,瘦素组M1细胞较多(53±5比77±8,平均差24[95%可信区间(CI) 11 ~ 37];p = 0.002),但M1细胞的比例(M1细胞数量占巨噬细胞总数的比例)并不高(18.6%±2.9%比21.5%±1.7%,平均差2.9% [95% CI -2.8% ~ 8.7%];P = 0.36)。术后4周,瘦素组M1细胞增多(31±4比50±6),平均差异19 (95% CI 6 ~ 32);p = 0.008)和更高的比例(16.4%±2.6%比23.0%±3.0%,平均差6.6% [95% CI 0.8%至12.4%];P = 0.03)。体内实验表明,瘦素可损害肌腱-骨愈合。术后4周,两组的生物力学特性在最大失效负荷方面无差异(12.7±1.6 N vs 12.4±1.8 N,平均差-0.3 N [95% CI -2.6 ~ 1.8];p = 0.91),刚度(5.1±0.7 N/mm vs 4.6±0.8 N/mm,平均差-0.5 N/mm [95% CI -1.3 ~ 0.5];p = 0.44),拉伸破坏应力(2.0±0.3 N/mm2 vs 2.0±0.3 N/mm2,平均差值0.0 N/mm2 [95% CI -0.4 ~ 0.4];P = 0.99)。术后8周,瘦素组最大衰竭负荷更差(17.6±1.4 N比14.1±1.4 N,平均差-3.5 N [95% CI -5.7 ~ -1.3];p = 0.002),刚度(7.0±0.6 N/mm vs 5.2±0.6 N/mm,平均差-1.8 N/mm [95% CI -2.7至-0.9];p < 0.001),拉伸破坏应力(3.4±0.3 N/mm2 vs 2.8±0.4 N/mm2,平均差-0.6 N/mm2 [95% CI -1.0至-0.2];P = 0.007)。 组织学染色、图像评估和步态分析的结果也表明瘦素损害了愈合过程。体外实验表明,瘦素上调TNF通路分子的基因表达,包括CCL2和受体相互作用蛋白激酶1 (RIPK1),以及M1标记,如TNF-α、CD86和Nos2;c-1的加入中和了瘦素对巨噬细胞极化的影响,降低了M1标记物(包括TNF-α、CD86和Nos2)的表达,阻断了TNF信号通路(包括CCL2和RIPK)。蛋白表达也表现出类似的趋势。结论:根据本研究结果,瘦素可能会损害肌腱袖撕裂大鼠模型的肌腱-骨愈合,促进肌腱-骨界面M1巨噬细胞极化,并上调巨噬细胞TNF信号通路促进M1极化。临床意义:肥胖和脂肪浸润与肩袖撕裂愈合不良有关。本研究探讨了脂肪因子瘦素对肌腱-骨愈合的影响及其机制。未来的研究可能会集中在开发新的方法,以瘦素或肿瘤坏死因子信号通路为目标,在生物材料的帮助下改善肥胖患者的肌腱-骨愈合。
Leptin Enhances M1 Macrophage Polarization and Impairs Tendon-Bone Healing in Rotator Cuff Repair: A Rat Model.
Background: Rotator cuff tears are common, affecting more than 60% of individuals older than 80 years, and they have been implicated in 70% of patients with shoulder pain. M1 polarization-related inflammation has been reported to be associated with poor healing outcomes of rotator cuff injury, and leptin, an adipokine, has been reported to be a potential activator of inflammation. However, whether leptin affects rotator cuff repair remains unknown.
Questions/purposes: Using in vitro cell experiments and an in vivo rat rotator cuff tear model, we therefore asked: (1) Does leptin promote the M1 polarization of macrophages in vitro and in vivo? (2) Does leptin impair biomechanical strength, the histologic structure of the tendon-bone interface, bone mineral density (BMD), or gait in the rotator cuff tear scenario? (3) Does leptin promote M1 polarization by upregulating the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) pathway?
Methods: The impact of leptin on M1 macrophage polarization in vitro was determined by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), the Western blot test, and immunofluorescence staining. The effect of leptin on tendon-bone healing was assessed in an in vivo rat rotator cuff tear model by comparing a leptin group with a suture group in terms of gait, biomechanical tensile strength, the histologic structure of the tendon-bone interface, and BMD. In the in vivo experiments, 8-week-old male Sprague Dawley rats were used, adapting a previously developed rat rotator cuff tear model. The supraspinatus tendon was resected from the greater tuberosity bilaterally, and then the tendon was secured to its anatomical footprint using the transosseous single-row technique. In total, 30 rats were randomized into two groups (suture, leptin) by drawing lots (15 rats in each group). They were assessed at 2, 4, and 8 weeks after the surgery. In the suture group, 100 µL of normal saline was injected into the subacromial space after the deltoid muscle was restitched to the original position. In the leptin group, 100 µL of leptin solution (200 ng/mL) was injected into the subacromial space after the deltoid muscle was restitched to the original position. Biomechanical properties including maximal failure load, stiffness, and tensile failure stress were determined to assess the biomechanical strength at 4 and 8 weeks after the surgery. Histologic staining was conducted to compare the structure of the tendon-bone interface between treatment groups. Micro-MRI and micro-CT assessments were conducted to compare the overall healing outcome and BMD between treatment groups. Gait analysis was conducted to compare the stride length and strength between treatment groups. M1 macrophage polarization in vivo at the tendon-bone interface was assessed by immunofluorescence staining. Finally, to explore the underlying mechanism of the effects of leptin, Necrostatin-1 (Nec-1) was used to block the TNF signaling pathway in the in vitro macrophage study, and RT-PCR and Western blot were used to explore the underlying mechanism.
Results: Leptin enhanced LPS-induced M1 polarization of macrophages in vitro, showing increased gene expression of CD86, Nos2, and TNF-α as well as increased protein expression of CD86, TNF-α, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and inducible NO synthase (iNOS). The in vivo polarization showed that the M1 polarization of macrophages at the tendon-bone interface was promoted. At 2 weeks postoperatively, there were more M1 cells in the leptin group (53 ± 5 versus 77 ± 8, mean difference 24 [95% confidence interval (CI) 11 to 37]; p = 0.002), although the proportion of M1 cells (ratio of the number of M1 cells to the total number of macrophages) was not higher (18.6% ± 2.9% versus 21.5% ± 1.7%, mean difference 2.9% [95% CI -2.8% to 8.7%]; p = 0.36). At 4 weeks postoperatively, the leptin group exhibited more M1 cells (31 ± 4 versus 50 ± 6, mean difference 19 [95% CI 6 to 32]; p = 0.008) and at a higher proportion (16.4% ± 2.6% versus 23.0% ± 3.0%, mean difference 6.6% [95% CI 0.8% to 12.4%]; p = 0.03). The in vivo experiments showed that leptin impaired tendon-bone healing. At 4 weeks postoperatively, the biomechanical properties of both groups were not different in terms of maximal failure load (12.7 ± 1.6 N versus 12.4 ± 1.8 N, mean difference -0.3 N [95% CI -2.6 to 1.8]; p = 0.91), stiffness (5.1 ± 0.7 N/mm versus 4.6 ± 0.8 N/mm, mean difference -0.5 N/mm [95% CI -1.3 to 0.5]; p = 0.44), and tensile failure stress (2.0 ± 0.3 N/mm 2 versus 2.0 ± 0.3 N/mm 2 , mean difference 0.0 N/mm 2 [95% CI -0.4 to 0.4]; p = 0.99). At 8 weeks postoperatively, the leptin group showed worse maximal failure load (17.6 ± 1.4 N versus 14.1 ± 1.4 N, mean difference -3.5 N [95% CI -5.7 to -1.3]; p = 0.002), stiffness (7.0 ± 0.6 N/mm versus 5.2 ± 0.6 N/mm, mean difference -1.8 N/mm [95% CI -2.7 to -0.9]; p < 0.001), and tensile failure stress (3.4 ± 0.3 N/mm 2 versus 2.8 ± 0.4 N/mm 2 , mean difference -0.6 N/mm 2 [95% CI -1.0 to -0.2]; p = 0.007). Results of histologic staining, image assessments, and gait analysis also demonstrated that leptin impaired the healing process. In vitro experiments showed that leptin upregulated the gene expression of molecules in the TNF pathway, including CCL2 and receptor-interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1), and M1 markers, such as TNF-α, CD86, and Nos2; the addition of Nec-1 neutralized the effect of leptin on macrophage polarization, reducing the expression of M1 markers, including TNF-α, CD86, and Nos2, and blocking the TNF signaling pathway, including CCL2 and RIPK. The protein expression exhibited similar trends.
Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, leptin appears to impair tendon-bone healing in a rat model of rotator cuff tear, promote M1 macrophage polarization at the tendon-bone interface, and upregulate the TNF signaling pathway in macrophages to promote M1 polarization.
Clinical relevance: Obesity and fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff muscle are associated with poor healing of rotator cuff tears. In this study, the effect of leptin, an adipose factor, on tendon-bone healing and the underlying mechanism were explored. Future studies might focus on developing novel approaches to improve the tendon-bone healing in patients with obesity by targeting leptin or the TNF signaling pathway with the aid of biomaterials.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® is a leading peer-reviewed journal devoted to the dissemination of new and important orthopaedic knowledge.
CORR® brings readers the latest clinical and basic research, along with columns, commentaries, and interviews with authors.