微生物组研究中常用膳食蛋白质来源中的大量细菌DNA和蛋白质。

IF 3.4 4区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Proteomics Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1002/pmic.202400149
Alexandria Bartlett, J Alfredo Blakeley-Ruiz, Tanner Richie, Casey M Theriot, Manuel Kleiner
{"title":"微生物组研究中常用膳食蛋白质来源中的大量细菌DNA和蛋白质。","authors":"Alexandria Bartlett, J Alfredo Blakeley-Ruiz, Tanner Richie, Casey M Theriot, Manuel Kleiner","doi":"10.1002/pmic.202400149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diet has been shown to greatly impact the intestinal microbiota. To understand the role of individual dietary components, defined diets with purified components are frequently used in diet-microbiota studies. Defined diets frequently use purified casein as the protein source. Previous work indicated that casein contains microbial DNA potentially impacting results of microbiome studies. Other diet-based microbially derived molecules that may impact microbiome measurements, such as proteins detected by metaproteomics, have not been determined for casein. Additionally, other protein sources used in microbiome studies have not been characterized for their microbial content. We used metagenomics and metaproteomics to identify and quantify microbial DNA and protein in a casein-based defined diet to better understand potential impacts on metagenomic and metaproteomic microbiome studies. We further tested six additional defined diets with purified protein sources with an integrated metagenomic-metaproteomic approach and found that contaminating microbial protein is unique to casein within the tested set as microbial protein was not identified in diets with other protein sources. We also illustrate the contribution of diet-derived microbial protein in diet-microbiota studies by metaproteomic analysis of stool samples from germ-free mice (GF) and mice with a conventional microbiota (CV) following consumption of diets with casein and non-casein protein. This study highlights a potentially confounding factor in diet-microbiota studies that must be considered through evaluation of the diet itself within a given study.</p>","PeriodicalId":224,"journal":{"name":"Proteomics","volume":" ","pages":"e202400149"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Large Quantities of Bacterial DNA and Protein in Common Dietary Protein Source Used in Microbiome Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Alexandria Bartlett, J Alfredo Blakeley-Ruiz, Tanner Richie, Casey M Theriot, Manuel Kleiner\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pmic.202400149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Diet has been shown to greatly impact the intestinal microbiota. To understand the role of individual dietary components, defined diets with purified components are frequently used in diet-microbiota studies. Defined diets frequently use purified casein as the protein source. Previous work indicated that casein contains microbial DNA potentially impacting results of microbiome studies. Other diet-based microbially derived molecules that may impact microbiome measurements, such as proteins detected by metaproteomics, have not been determined for casein. Additionally, other protein sources used in microbiome studies have not been characterized for their microbial content. We used metagenomics and metaproteomics to identify and quantify microbial DNA and protein in a casein-based defined diet to better understand potential impacts on metagenomic and metaproteomic microbiome studies. We further tested six additional defined diets with purified protein sources with an integrated metagenomic-metaproteomic approach and found that contaminating microbial protein is unique to casein within the tested set as microbial protein was not identified in diets with other protein sources. We also illustrate the contribution of diet-derived microbial protein in diet-microbiota studies by metaproteomic analysis of stool samples from germ-free mice (GF) and mice with a conventional microbiota (CV) following consumption of diets with casein and non-casein protein. This study highlights a potentially confounding factor in diet-microbiota studies that must be considered through evaluation of the diet itself within a given study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proteomics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e202400149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proteomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.202400149\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proteomics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.202400149","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

饮食已被证明对肠道微生物群有很大的影响。为了了解单个饮食成分的作用,在饮食微生物群研究中经常使用含有纯化成分的特定饮食。特定的饮食通常使用纯化酪蛋白作为蛋白质来源。先前的研究表明,酪蛋白含有微生物DNA,可能会影响微生物组研究的结果。其他可能影响微生物组测量的基于饮食的微生物衍生分子,如宏蛋白质组学检测到的蛋白质,尚未确定酪蛋白。此外,微生物组研究中使用的其他蛋白质来源尚未对其微生物含量进行表征。我们使用宏基因组学和宏蛋白质组学来鉴定和量化以酪蛋白为基础的定义饮食中的微生物DNA和蛋白质,以更好地了解对宏基因组学和元蛋白质组学微生物组研究的潜在影响。我们进一步用综合元基因组-元蛋白质组学方法测试了另外六种含有纯化蛋白质来源的特定饮食,发现受污染的微生物蛋白质是测试组中酪蛋白所特有的,因为在含有其他蛋白质来源的饮食中没有发现微生物蛋白质。我们还通过对食用含有酪蛋白和非酪蛋白的饮食后的无菌小鼠(GF)和具有常规微生物群(CV)的小鼠的粪便样本进行元蛋白质组学分析,说明了饮食来源的微生物蛋白在饮食微生物群研究中的贡献。这项研究强调了饮食-微生物群研究中一个潜在的混淆因素,必须在给定研究中通过评估饮食本身来考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Large Quantities of Bacterial DNA and Protein in Common Dietary Protein Source Used in Microbiome Studies.

Diet has been shown to greatly impact the intestinal microbiota. To understand the role of individual dietary components, defined diets with purified components are frequently used in diet-microbiota studies. Defined diets frequently use purified casein as the protein source. Previous work indicated that casein contains microbial DNA potentially impacting results of microbiome studies. Other diet-based microbially derived molecules that may impact microbiome measurements, such as proteins detected by metaproteomics, have not been determined for casein. Additionally, other protein sources used in microbiome studies have not been characterized for their microbial content. We used metagenomics and metaproteomics to identify and quantify microbial DNA and protein in a casein-based defined diet to better understand potential impacts on metagenomic and metaproteomic microbiome studies. We further tested six additional defined diets with purified protein sources with an integrated metagenomic-metaproteomic approach and found that contaminating microbial protein is unique to casein within the tested set as microbial protein was not identified in diets with other protein sources. We also illustrate the contribution of diet-derived microbial protein in diet-microbiota studies by metaproteomic analysis of stool samples from germ-free mice (GF) and mice with a conventional microbiota (CV) following consumption of diets with casein and non-casein protein. This study highlights a potentially confounding factor in diet-microbiota studies that must be considered through evaluation of the diet itself within a given study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Proteomics
Proteomics 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: PROTEOMICS is the premier international source for information on all aspects of applications and technologies, including software, in proteomics and other "omics". The journal includes but is not limited to proteomics, genomics, transcriptomics, metabolomics and lipidomics, and systems biology approaches. Papers describing novel applications of proteomics and integration of multi-omics data and approaches are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信