{"title":"医学生质量改进项目在医疗保健中的作用:范围审查","authors":"Casey Stubbs, Bernadette Ward","doi":"10.1111/ajr.70009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Across Australia, there is considerable variation in the quality of health care and the risk of associated complications. Hence, many patients are receiving poor-quality care. This may be exacerbated in rural and remote areas where the availability of health care is relatively limited. Addressing this requires a multipronged approach that supports the workforce. Involving medical practitioners in medical students' quality improvement (QI) scholarly projects may be one strategy to assist with bridging this gap. The aim of this review was to synthesise the evidence relating to medical students' compulsory curriculum-based quality improvement projects and associated practice outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Scoping review of peer-reviewed literature (January 2000–June 2024).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of the 239 articles, six empirical studies from Australia, New Zealand, the UK and the USA were included. Half of these were based in community settings and the rest in hospitals. Only one was in a rural setting. The time allocated to projects was between 5 and 12 weeks. Five of the six studies reported that student project recommendations had been implemented. One study reported that the process enhanced doctors' adherence to best practice guidelines.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Much of the research about the outcomes of medical student curriculum-based projects focuses on research outputs. These relatively short student QI projects are one strategy to improve evidence-based practice while upskilling clinicians. Further work is needed to examine their impact, particularly in rural areas.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Integrating medical students into ‘real-world’ QI health service projects can enhance the quality of health care whilst building the skills of the medical workforce.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55421,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Rural Health","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajr.70009","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Medical Student Quality Improvement Projects in Health Care: A Scoping Review\",\"authors\":\"Casey Stubbs, Bernadette Ward\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajr.70009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Across Australia, there is considerable variation in the quality of health care and the risk of associated complications. Hence, many patients are receiving poor-quality care. This may be exacerbated in rural and remote areas where the availability of health care is relatively limited. Addressing this requires a multipronged approach that supports the workforce. Involving medical practitioners in medical students' quality improvement (QI) scholarly projects may be one strategy to assist with bridging this gap. The aim of this review was to synthesise the evidence relating to medical students' compulsory curriculum-based quality improvement projects and associated practice outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>Scoping review of peer-reviewed literature (January 2000–June 2024).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of the 239 articles, six empirical studies from Australia, New Zealand, the UK and the USA were included. Half of these were based in community settings and the rest in hospitals. Only one was in a rural setting. The time allocated to projects was between 5 and 12 weeks. Five of the six studies reported that student project recommendations had been implemented. One study reported that the process enhanced doctors' adherence to best practice guidelines.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Much of the research about the outcomes of medical student curriculum-based projects focuses on research outputs. These relatively short student QI projects are one strategy to improve evidence-based practice while upskilling clinicians. Further work is needed to examine their impact, particularly in rural areas.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Integrating medical students into ‘real-world’ QI health service projects can enhance the quality of health care whilst building the skills of the medical workforce.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Rural Health\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajr.70009\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Rural Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajr.70009\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajr.70009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Role of Medical Student Quality Improvement Projects in Health Care: A Scoping Review
Introduction
Across Australia, there is considerable variation in the quality of health care and the risk of associated complications. Hence, many patients are receiving poor-quality care. This may be exacerbated in rural and remote areas where the availability of health care is relatively limited. Addressing this requires a multipronged approach that supports the workforce. Involving medical practitioners in medical students' quality improvement (QI) scholarly projects may be one strategy to assist with bridging this gap. The aim of this review was to synthesise the evidence relating to medical students' compulsory curriculum-based quality improvement projects and associated practice outcomes.
Method
Scoping review of peer-reviewed literature (January 2000–June 2024).
Results
Of the 239 articles, six empirical studies from Australia, New Zealand, the UK and the USA were included. Half of these were based in community settings and the rest in hospitals. Only one was in a rural setting. The time allocated to projects was between 5 and 12 weeks. Five of the six studies reported that student project recommendations had been implemented. One study reported that the process enhanced doctors' adherence to best practice guidelines.
Discussion
Much of the research about the outcomes of medical student curriculum-based projects focuses on research outputs. These relatively short student QI projects are one strategy to improve evidence-based practice while upskilling clinicians. Further work is needed to examine their impact, particularly in rural areas.
Conclusion
Integrating medical students into ‘real-world’ QI health service projects can enhance the quality of health care whilst building the skills of the medical workforce.
期刊介绍:
The Australian Journal of Rural Health publishes articles in the field of rural health. It facilitates the formation of interdisciplinary networks, so that rural health professionals can form a cohesive group and work together for the advancement of rural practice, in all health disciplines. The Journal aims to establish a national and international reputation for the quality of its scholarly discourse and its value to rural health professionals. All articles, unless otherwise identified, are peer reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.