Katelyn A. Mazzochi MD , Sheraya De Silva BSc(Hon) , Nicholas L.M. Chan MD , Erin McGann MPhysio , Tayla L. Robertson MPhysioPrac , Tahnee R. Hellings MPhysioPrac , Carol L. Hodgson PhD , Alisa M. Higgins PhD
{"title":"Long-Term Outcomes of Patients With COVID-19 Who Are Critically Ill","authors":"Katelyn A. Mazzochi MD ,&nbsp;Sheraya De Silva BSc(Hon) ,&nbsp;Nicholas L.M. Chan MD ,&nbsp;Erin McGann MPhysio ,&nbsp;Tayla L. Robertson MPhysioPrac ,&nbsp;Tahnee R. Hellings MPhysioPrac ,&nbsp;Carol L. Hodgson PhD ,&nbsp;Alisa M. Higgins PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.chstcc.2024.100108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Survivors of critical illness are susceptible to long-term functional impairments after admission to an ICU. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of patients admitted to an ICU with SARS-CoV-2 infection surged. The long-term consequences of critical illness resulting from COVID-19 illness remain unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><div>What are the long-term outcomes of adult patients admitted to an ICU for COVID-19?</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><div>We searched Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE using subject heading and free-text terms related to long-term outcomes of critically ill patients with COVID-19. We included all articles that reported original data on outcomes from 90 days onward for adult patients admitted to an ICU for COVID-19. Data extracted included study details, patient characteristics, outcomes reported, measurement tools used, and timing of assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 14,882 studies were screened, from which 134 studies fulfilled the selection criteria. Follow-up time points ranged from 90 days to 2 years after critical illness. Mortality after hospitalization was the most reported outcome (n = 60), with the general ICU cohort having an aggregate mortality rate of 35.5% (95% CI, 34.7%-36.2%) at 90 days and 31.6% (95% CI, 30.9%-32.4%) at 6 months. A plethora of other outcomes were assessed, including psychologic function and mental health (n = 49), persistent symptoms (n = 47), quality of life (n = 47), physical function (n = 33), and cognitive function (n = 31). For each outcome, different measurement tools were used, making data synthesis across studies difficult.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Important evidence gaps remain regarding the long-term health outcomes and health care needs for survivors of critical COVID-19 illness. This review found that mortality was the most reported long-term outcome. Significant heterogeneity was evident across studies in terms of outcomes assessed, measurement instruments used, and the duration of follow-up. Future research requires increased consistency in outcomes assessed and measurement tools to inform clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93934,"journal":{"name":"CHEST critical care","volume":"3 1","pages":"Article 100108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHEST critical care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949788424000625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景危重症患者入住重症监护病房后,很容易出现长期功能障碍。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,因感染 SARS-CoV-2 而入住重症监护病房的患者人数激增。研究问题因 COVID-19 而入住 ICU 的成年患者的长期预后如何?研究设计和方法我们使用与 COVID-19 重症患者长期预后相关的主题词和自由文本词检索了 Ovid MEDLINE 和 EMBASE。我们收录了所有报道了因 COVID-19 而入住重症监护室的成年患者 90 天后疗效的原始数据的文章。提取的数据包括研究细节、患者特征、结果报告、使用的测量工具以及评估时间。随访时间点从危重病后 90 天到 2 年不等。住院后的死亡率是报道最多的结果(n = 60),普通重症监护室队列在 90 天时的总死亡率为 35.5%(95% CI,34.7%-36.2%),6 个月时的总死亡率为 31.6%(95% CI,30.9%-32.4%)。还评估了大量其他结果,包括心理功能和精神健康(49 例)、持续症状(47 例)、生活质量(47 例)、身体功能(33 例)和认知功能(31 例)。对于每种结果,都使用了不同的测量工具,因此很难对各项研究的数据进行综合。释义在 COVID-19 危重症幸存者的长期健康结果和医疗保健需求方面仍存在重要的证据缺口。本综述发现,死亡率是报告最多的长期结果。各研究在评估结果、使用的测量工具和随访时间方面存在明显的异质性。未来的研究需要提高评估结果和测量工具的一致性,以便为临床实践提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-Term Outcomes of Patients With COVID-19 Who Are Critically Ill

Background

Survivors of critical illness are susceptible to long-term functional impairments after admission to an ICU. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of patients admitted to an ICU with SARS-CoV-2 infection surged. The long-term consequences of critical illness resulting from COVID-19 illness remain unclear.

Research Question

What are the long-term outcomes of adult patients admitted to an ICU for COVID-19?

Study Design and Methods

We searched Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE using subject heading and free-text terms related to long-term outcomes of critically ill patients with COVID-19. We included all articles that reported original data on outcomes from 90 days onward for adult patients admitted to an ICU for COVID-19. Data extracted included study details, patient characteristics, outcomes reported, measurement tools used, and timing of assessment.

Results

A total of 14,882 studies were screened, from which 134 studies fulfilled the selection criteria. Follow-up time points ranged from 90 days to 2 years after critical illness. Mortality after hospitalization was the most reported outcome (n = 60), with the general ICU cohort having an aggregate mortality rate of 35.5% (95% CI, 34.7%-36.2%) at 90 days and 31.6% (95% CI, 30.9%-32.4%) at 6 months. A plethora of other outcomes were assessed, including psychologic function and mental health (n = 49), persistent symptoms (n = 47), quality of life (n = 47), physical function (n = 33), and cognitive function (n = 31). For each outcome, different measurement tools were used, making data synthesis across studies difficult.

Interpretation

Important evidence gaps remain regarding the long-term health outcomes and health care needs for survivors of critical COVID-19 illness. This review found that mortality was the most reported long-term outcome. Significant heterogeneity was evident across studies in terms of outcomes assessed, measurement instruments used, and the duration of follow-up. Future research requires increased consistency in outcomes assessed and measurement tools to inform clinical practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CHEST critical care
CHEST critical care Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信