比较公共中介和私人中介在中介生态中的共存

IF 5.7 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Lisa Bastås, Ingrid Mignon
{"title":"比较公共中介和私人中介在中介生态中的共存","authors":"Lisa Bastås,&nbsp;Ingrid Mignon","doi":"10.1016/j.eist.2025.100972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ecologies of intermediation are important in facilitating the adoption of renewable electricity technologies by supporting adopters. However, previous research has suggested that this support is fragmented and uncoordinated. This paper draws attention to the support provided by two actor-types co-existing in an ecology of intermediation: public and private intermediaries. While differences between these intermediary types have earlier been suggested, these assumptions have not been tested on a larger sample. The analysis of novel survey data shows that public and private intermediaries co-existing in the studied ecology exhibit complementarities regarding target groups, activities, and timing of the provided support. The extent of these complementarities and potentials reasons are finally discussed, raising the question of innovation system maturity and well as additional characteristics of the ecology of intermediation in the specific context of solar PV technology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54294,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 100972"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing public and private intermediaries co-existing in ecologies of intermediation\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Bastås,&nbsp;Ingrid Mignon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eist.2025.100972\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Ecologies of intermediation are important in facilitating the adoption of renewable electricity technologies by supporting adopters. However, previous research has suggested that this support is fragmented and uncoordinated. This paper draws attention to the support provided by two actor-types co-existing in an ecology of intermediation: public and private intermediaries. While differences between these intermediary types have earlier been suggested, these assumptions have not been tested on a larger sample. The analysis of novel survey data shows that public and private intermediaries co-existing in the studied ecology exhibit complementarities regarding target groups, activities, and timing of the provided support. The extent of these complementarities and potentials reasons are finally discussed, raising the question of innovation system maturity and well as additional characteristics of the ecology of intermediation in the specific context of solar PV technology.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions\",\"volume\":\"56 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100972\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210422425000115\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210422425000115","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过支持采用者,中介生态在促进可再生电力技术的采用方面非常重要。然而,先前的研究表明,这种支持是分散和不协调的。本文关注中介生态中共存的两种行为体类型:公共中介和私人中介所提供的支持。虽然这些中间类型之间的差异早前已被提出,但这些假设尚未在更大的样本上得到检验。对新调查数据的分析表明,在研究生态中共存的公共和私人中介机构在目标群体、活动和提供支持的时间方面表现出互补性。最后讨论了这些互补性的程度和潜在原因,提出了创新系统成熟度的问题,以及太阳能光伏技术特定背景下中介生态的附加特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing public and private intermediaries co-existing in ecologies of intermediation
Ecologies of intermediation are important in facilitating the adoption of renewable electricity technologies by supporting adopters. However, previous research has suggested that this support is fragmented and uncoordinated. This paper draws attention to the support provided by two actor-types co-existing in an ecology of intermediation: public and private intermediaries. While differences between these intermediary types have earlier been suggested, these assumptions have not been tested on a larger sample. The analysis of novel survey data shows that public and private intermediaries co-existing in the studied ecology exhibit complementarities regarding target groups, activities, and timing of the provided support. The extent of these complementarities and potentials reasons are finally discussed, raising the question of innovation system maturity and well as additional characteristics of the ecology of intermediation in the specific context of solar PV technology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
90
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions serves as a platform for reporting studies on innovations and socio-economic transitions aimed at fostering an environmentally sustainable economy, thereby addressing structural resource scarcity and environmental challenges, particularly those associated with fossil energy use and climate change. The journal focuses on various forms of innovation, including technological, organizational, economic, institutional, and political, as well as economy-wide and sectoral changes in areas such as energy, transport, agriculture, and water management. It endeavors to tackle complex questions concerning social, economic, behavioral-psychological, and political barriers and opportunities, along with their intricate interactions. With a multidisciplinary approach and methodological openness, the journal welcomes contributions from a wide array of disciplines within the social, environmental, and innovation sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信