对消费者和医疗保健专业人员对数字医疗的信任进行系统回顾

IF 15.1 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Soraia de Camargo Catapan, Hannah Sazon, Sophie Zheng, Victor Gallegos-Rejas, Roshni Mendis, Pedro H. R. Santiago, Jaimon T. Kelly
{"title":"对消费者和医疗保健专业人员对数字医疗的信任进行系统回顾","authors":"Soraia de Camargo Catapan, Hannah Sazon, Sophie Zheng, Victor Gallegos-Rejas, Roshni Mendis, Pedro H. R. Santiago, Jaimon T. Kelly","doi":"10.1038/s41746-025-01510-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite the well-documented importance of trust in digital healthcare, its domains are not well-understood, preventing theoretically robust instruments for standardised measurements. We identified instruments measuring trust in digital healthcare, explored definitions, associated factors, and outcomes. We systematically reviewed the literature using tailored searches and 49 studies measuring trust in digital healthcare from either consumers’, healthcare professionals’, or both perspectives were included. Trust in digital healthcare is complex and, from a consumers’ perspective, can influence digital healthcare use, adoption, acceptance, and usefulness. Consumers’ trust can be affected by the degree of human interaction in automated interventions, perceived risks, privacy concerns, data accuracy, digital literacy, quality of the digital healthcare intervention, satisfaction, education, and income. Healthcare professionals’ trust is enhanced by education and observing good digital health performance. While studies can benefit from rigorous trust measurements, future efforts should address the need for a theoretical framework for trust in digital healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":19349,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Digital Medicine","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of consumers’ and healthcare professionals’ trust in digital healthcare\",\"authors\":\"Soraia de Camargo Catapan, Hannah Sazon, Sophie Zheng, Victor Gallegos-Rejas, Roshni Mendis, Pedro H. R. Santiago, Jaimon T. Kelly\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41746-025-01510-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Despite the well-documented importance of trust in digital healthcare, its domains are not well-understood, preventing theoretically robust instruments for standardised measurements. We identified instruments measuring trust in digital healthcare, explored definitions, associated factors, and outcomes. We systematically reviewed the literature using tailored searches and 49 studies measuring trust in digital healthcare from either consumers’, healthcare professionals’, or both perspectives were included. Trust in digital healthcare is complex and, from a consumers’ perspective, can influence digital healthcare use, adoption, acceptance, and usefulness. Consumers’ trust can be affected by the degree of human interaction in automated interventions, perceived risks, privacy concerns, data accuracy, digital literacy, quality of the digital healthcare intervention, satisfaction, education, and income. Healthcare professionals’ trust is enhanced by education and observing good digital health performance. While studies can benefit from rigorous trust measurements, future efforts should address the need for a theoretical framework for trust in digital healthcare.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Digital Medicine\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Digital Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01510-8\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Digital Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01510-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管信任在数字医疗保健中的重要性有据可查,但其领域尚未得到很好的理解,这阻碍了理论上可靠的标准化测量工具。我们确定了衡量数字医疗信任的工具,探讨了定义、相关因素和结果。我们使用量身定制的搜索系统地回顾了文献,并纳入了49项研究,从消费者、医疗保健专业人员或两者的角度衡量对数字医疗的信任。对数字医疗保健的信任是复杂的,从消费者的角度来看,信任可以影响数字医疗保健的使用、采用、接受和有用性。消费者的信任可能受到自动化干预中人类互动程度、感知风险、隐私问题、数据准确性、数字素养、数字医疗干预质量、满意度、教育和收入的影响。通过教育和观察良好的数字健康表现,医疗保健专业人员的信任得到增强。虽然研究可以从严格的信任测量中受益,但未来的努力应该解决对数字医疗信任理论框架的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A systematic review of consumers’ and healthcare professionals’ trust in digital healthcare

A systematic review of consumers’ and healthcare professionals’ trust in digital healthcare

Despite the well-documented importance of trust in digital healthcare, its domains are not well-understood, preventing theoretically robust instruments for standardised measurements. We identified instruments measuring trust in digital healthcare, explored definitions, associated factors, and outcomes. We systematically reviewed the literature using tailored searches and 49 studies measuring trust in digital healthcare from either consumers’, healthcare professionals’, or both perspectives were included. Trust in digital healthcare is complex and, from a consumers’ perspective, can influence digital healthcare use, adoption, acceptance, and usefulness. Consumers’ trust can be affected by the degree of human interaction in automated interventions, perceived risks, privacy concerns, data accuracy, digital literacy, quality of the digital healthcare intervention, satisfaction, education, and income. Healthcare professionals’ trust is enhanced by education and observing good digital health performance. While studies can benefit from rigorous trust measurements, future efforts should address the need for a theoretical framework for trust in digital healthcare.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
170
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Digital Medicine is an online open-access journal that focuses on publishing peer-reviewed research in the field of digital medicine. The journal covers various aspects of digital medicine, including the application and implementation of digital and mobile technologies in clinical settings, virtual healthcare, and the use of artificial intelligence and informatics. The primary goal of the journal is to support innovation and the advancement of healthcare through the integration of new digital and mobile technologies. When determining if a manuscript is suitable for publication, the journal considers four important criteria: novelty, clinical relevance, scientific rigor, and digital innovation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信