{"title":"蓝色怪物在z bbb10:他们所有的灰尘都去了哪里","authors":"A. Ferrara, A. Pallottini, L. Sommovigo","doi":"10.1051/0004-6361/202452707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The properties of luminous, blue, super-early galaxies (a.k.a. blue monsters) at redshift <i>z<i/> > 10 have been successfully explained by the attenuation-free model (AFM), in which dust is pushed to kiloparsec scales by radiation-driven outflows. As an alternative to AFM, here we assess whether “attenuation-free” conditions can be replaced by a “dust-free” scenario in which dust is produced in very limited amounts and/or later destroyed in the interstellar medium. To this aim, we compare the predicted values of the dust-to-stellar mass ratio, <i>ξ<i/><sub><i>d<i/><sub/>, with those measured in 15 galaxies at <i>z<i/> > 10 from <i>James Webb<i/> Space Telescope (JWST) spectra, when outflows are not included. Our model constrains <i>ξ<i/><sub><i>d<i/><sub/> as a function of several parameters by allowing wide variations in the initial mass function (IMF), dust and metal production, and dust destruction for a set of supernova (SN) progenitor models and explosion energies. We find that log <i>ξ<i/><sub><i>d<i/><sub/> ≈ −2.2 for all systems, which is indicative of the dominant role of SN dust production over destruction in these early galaxies. Such a value is strikingly different from the data, which instead indicates log <i>ξ<i/><sub><i>d<i/><sub/> ≲ −4. We conclude that dust destruction alone can hardly explain the transparency of blue monsters. Other mechanisms, such as outflows, might be required.","PeriodicalId":8571,"journal":{"name":"Astronomy & Astrophysics","volume":"88 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blue monsters at z > 10: Where all their dust has gone\",\"authors\":\"A. Ferrara, A. Pallottini, L. Sommovigo\",\"doi\":\"10.1051/0004-6361/202452707\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The properties of luminous, blue, super-early galaxies (a.k.a. blue monsters) at redshift <i>z<i/> > 10 have been successfully explained by the attenuation-free model (AFM), in which dust is pushed to kiloparsec scales by radiation-driven outflows. As an alternative to AFM, here we assess whether “attenuation-free” conditions can be replaced by a “dust-free” scenario in which dust is produced in very limited amounts and/or later destroyed in the interstellar medium. To this aim, we compare the predicted values of the dust-to-stellar mass ratio, <i>ξ<i/><sub><i>d<i/><sub/>, with those measured in 15 galaxies at <i>z<i/> > 10 from <i>James Webb<i/> Space Telescope (JWST) spectra, when outflows are not included. Our model constrains <i>ξ<i/><sub><i>d<i/><sub/> as a function of several parameters by allowing wide variations in the initial mass function (IMF), dust and metal production, and dust destruction for a set of supernova (SN) progenitor models and explosion energies. We find that log <i>ξ<i/><sub><i>d<i/><sub/> ≈ −2.2 for all systems, which is indicative of the dominant role of SN dust production over destruction in these early galaxies. Such a value is strikingly different from the data, which instead indicates log <i>ξ<i/><sub><i>d<i/><sub/> ≲ −4. We conclude that dust destruction alone can hardly explain the transparency of blue monsters. Other mechanisms, such as outflows, might be required.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Astronomy & Astrophysics\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Astronomy & Astrophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202452707\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astronomy & Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202452707","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Blue monsters at z > 10: Where all their dust has gone
The properties of luminous, blue, super-early galaxies (a.k.a. blue monsters) at redshift z > 10 have been successfully explained by the attenuation-free model (AFM), in which dust is pushed to kiloparsec scales by radiation-driven outflows. As an alternative to AFM, here we assess whether “attenuation-free” conditions can be replaced by a “dust-free” scenario in which dust is produced in very limited amounts and/or later destroyed in the interstellar medium. To this aim, we compare the predicted values of the dust-to-stellar mass ratio, ξd, with those measured in 15 galaxies at z > 10 from James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) spectra, when outflows are not included. Our model constrains ξd as a function of several parameters by allowing wide variations in the initial mass function (IMF), dust and metal production, and dust destruction for a set of supernova (SN) progenitor models and explosion energies. We find that log ξd ≈ −2.2 for all systems, which is indicative of the dominant role of SN dust production over destruction in these early galaxies. Such a value is strikingly different from the data, which instead indicates log ξd ≲ −4. We conclude that dust destruction alone can hardly explain the transparency of blue monsters. Other mechanisms, such as outflows, might be required.
期刊介绍:
Astronomy & Astrophysics is an international Journal that publishes papers on all aspects of astronomy and astrophysics (theoretical, observational, and instrumental) independently of the techniques used to obtain the results.