IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Aarushi Soni, Prajith Carthik, Manoj Kumar Devara, Aysha Rooha, Gagan Bajaj, Sheetal Raj Moolambally, Arun Shirali, Archith Boloor
{"title":"Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of General Physicians towards Mild Cognitive Impairment amidst an evolving era of Interprofessional Collaboration: Insights from a small-scale survey in India.","authors":"Aarushi Soni, Prajith Carthik, Manoj Kumar Devara, Aysha Rooha, Gagan Bajaj, Sheetal Raj Moolambally, Arun Shirali, Archith Boloor","doi":"10.1186/s12875-025-02748-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early identification and intervention of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), led by General Physicians (GPs), can delay dementia onset and enhance patient outcomes. GPs recognize MCI risk factors, conduct assessments, and manage associated conditions, playing a crucial role in cognitive pathology intervention, especially in the era of Interprofessional Collaboration (IPC). In India, where cognitive impairment rates are projected to rise sharply, understanding GPs' knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) is vital. This study aimed to investigate the KAP of GPs regarding the diagnosis and treatment of MCI using a customized, predesigned questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study employed a cross-sectional design using a convenience sample of 180 invited participants between July and October 2023. A customized questionnaire, based on Lu et al., 2022, evaluated GPs' KAP regarding MCI and IPC in the Indian context towards its assessment and management. The tool including 9 knowledge items, 15 attitude items, and 12 practice items, was made available through Google Forms and disseminated via WhatsApp. Responses were scored to indicate KAP levels, with maximum scores being 50 for knowledge, 75 for attitudes, and 60 for practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>103 GPs completed the survey, showing varied practice experience. The average knowledge score was 28.1 ± 7.98, indicating uncertainty about MCI-related factors and diagnostic criteria. Attitude scores averaged 53.5 ± 4.73, with most GPs endorsing early detection and non-pharmacological interventions. Practice scores averaged 41.8 ± 8.32, showing mixed adherence to screening and referral practices. Most participants found IPC highly effective for MCI diagnosis and management, with many referring patients to specialists for confirmation, while over half used an IPC approach for both. Education level and previous experience significantly influenced knowledge and practice scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study sheds light on the evolving landscape of Indian GPs' KAP related to MCI assessment and management. It identifies areas where understanding could be strengthened and highlight opportunities for growth through education and training. Notably, there is a need for increased involvement in IPC. These findings emphasize the importance of holistic approaches, advocating for enhanced education and the fostering of collaborative relationships across disciplines to tackle the rising prevalence of MCI in India effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"26 1","pages":"46"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837318/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02748-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由全科医生(GPs)主导的轻度认知功能障碍(MCI)的早期识别和干预可以延缓痴呆症的发病并改善患者的预后。全科医生能够识别 MCI 风险因素、进行评估并管理相关疾病,在认知病理学干预方面发挥着至关重要的作用,尤其是在跨专业合作(IPC)时代。在印度,认知损伤率预计将急剧上升,因此了解全科医生的知识、态度和实践(KAP)至关重要。本研究旨在使用预先设计的定制问卷调查全科医生对 MCI 诊断和治疗的 KAP:本研究采用横断面设计,在 2023 年 7 月至 10 月间邀请了 180 名参与者进行抽样调查。根据 Lu 等人的研究(2022 年)定制的调查问卷评估了全科医生对 MCI 和 IPC 在印度的评估和管理方面的 KAP。该工具包括 9 个知识项目、15 个态度项目和 12 个实践项目,通过谷歌表格提供,并通过 WhatsApp 发布。对回答进行打分,以显示 KAP 水平,最高分为知识 50 分、态度 75 分和实践 60 分:103 名全科医生完成了调查,他们的实践经验各不相同。知识平均分为 28.1 ± 7.98 分,表明对 MCI 相关因素和诊断标准存在不确定性。态度得分平均为(53.5 ± 4.73)分,大多数全科医生赞同早期检测和非药物干预。实践得分平均为(41.8 ± 8.32)分,表明筛查和转诊实践的坚持程度参差不齐。大多数参与者认为IPC对MCI的诊断和管理非常有效,许多人将患者转诊至专科医生进行确诊,而超过半数的参与者在这两方面都采用了IPC方法。教育水平和以往经验对知识和实践得分有很大影响:本研究揭示了印度全科医生对 MCI 评估和管理的 KAP 的演变情况。它指出了可以加强理解的领域,并强调了通过教育和培训实现增长的机会。值得注意的是,有必要加强对 IPC 的参与。这些研究结果强调了综合方法的重要性,提倡加强教育和促进跨学科合作关系,以有效解决印度 MCI 发病率不断上升的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of General Physicians towards Mild Cognitive Impairment amidst an evolving era of Interprofessional Collaboration: Insights from a small-scale survey in India.

Background: Early identification and intervention of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), led by General Physicians (GPs), can delay dementia onset and enhance patient outcomes. GPs recognize MCI risk factors, conduct assessments, and manage associated conditions, playing a crucial role in cognitive pathology intervention, especially in the era of Interprofessional Collaboration (IPC). In India, where cognitive impairment rates are projected to rise sharply, understanding GPs' knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) is vital. This study aimed to investigate the KAP of GPs regarding the diagnosis and treatment of MCI using a customized, predesigned questionnaire.

Method: The study employed a cross-sectional design using a convenience sample of 180 invited participants between July and October 2023. A customized questionnaire, based on Lu et al., 2022, evaluated GPs' KAP regarding MCI and IPC in the Indian context towards its assessment and management. The tool including 9 knowledge items, 15 attitude items, and 12 practice items, was made available through Google Forms and disseminated via WhatsApp. Responses were scored to indicate KAP levels, with maximum scores being 50 for knowledge, 75 for attitudes, and 60 for practices.

Results: 103 GPs completed the survey, showing varied practice experience. The average knowledge score was 28.1 ± 7.98, indicating uncertainty about MCI-related factors and diagnostic criteria. Attitude scores averaged 53.5 ± 4.73, with most GPs endorsing early detection and non-pharmacological interventions. Practice scores averaged 41.8 ± 8.32, showing mixed adherence to screening and referral practices. Most participants found IPC highly effective for MCI diagnosis and management, with many referring patients to specialists for confirmation, while over half used an IPC approach for both. Education level and previous experience significantly influenced knowledge and practice scores.

Conclusion: This study sheds light on the evolving landscape of Indian GPs' KAP related to MCI assessment and management. It identifies areas where understanding could be strengthened and highlight opportunities for growth through education and training. Notably, there is a need for increased involvement in IPC. These findings emphasize the importance of holistic approaches, advocating for enhanced education and the fostering of collaborative relationships across disciplines to tackle the rising prevalence of MCI in India effectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信