腋窝淋巴结清扫遗漏对hr阳性、her2阴性前哨淋巴结阳性乳腺癌辅助治疗abemaciclib资格的影响

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Breast Cancer Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1007/s12282-025-01684-9
Kei Kawashima, Kazutaka Narui, Aya Nishikawa, Mahato Sasamoto, Masanori Oshi, Shoko Adachi, Akimitsu Yamada, Takashi Ishikawa, Itaru Endo
{"title":"腋窝淋巴结清扫遗漏对hr阳性、her2阴性前哨淋巴结阳性乳腺癌辅助治疗abemaciclib资格的影响","authors":"Kei Kawashima, Kazutaka Narui, Aya Nishikawa, Mahato Sasamoto, Masanori Oshi, Shoko Adachi, Akimitsu Yamada, Takashi Ishikawa, Itaru Endo","doi":"10.1007/s12282-025-01684-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The MonarchE trial demonstrated the additional benefit of abemaciclib as an adjuvant endocrine therapy for high-risk patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive HER2-negative breast cancer. Meanwhile, the ACOSOG Z0011 trial established the omission of axillary lymph-node dissection (ALND) as a standard practice in certain patients with positive sentinel lymph-node biopsy (SNB). However, as the MonarchE eligibility criteria include the presence of four or more lymph-node metastases, omitting ALND may hinder the assessment of abemaciclib eligibility in some cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study population consisted of patients with clinically node-negative, HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer who underwent SNB at our institution between January 2008 and December 2021. The proportion of patients meeting the MonarchE cohort1 criteria, and the potential impact of ALND omission on abemaciclib eligibility were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 1537 patients, 189 underwent SNB followed by ALND due to the presence of one or more positive sentinel nodes. Of these, 69 (36.5%) were eligible for abemaciclib. Eligibility was uncertain without ALND in 138 patients. Among the 138 patients, 124 were candidates for ALND omission, including 11 who were found to have four or more metastatic lymph nodes after completing ALND.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A few cases were identified in which abemaciclib eligibility was not properly determined due to ALND omission. This suggests that omitting ALND following SNB, when two of fewer positive nodes are detected, may not significantly impact the determination of abemaciclib eligibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":56083,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"543-551"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of axillary lymph-node dissection omission on adjuvant abemaciclib eligibility in HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer with positive sentinel lymph nodes.\",\"authors\":\"Kei Kawashima, Kazutaka Narui, Aya Nishikawa, Mahato Sasamoto, Masanori Oshi, Shoko Adachi, Akimitsu Yamada, Takashi Ishikawa, Itaru Endo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12282-025-01684-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The MonarchE trial demonstrated the additional benefit of abemaciclib as an adjuvant endocrine therapy for high-risk patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive HER2-negative breast cancer. Meanwhile, the ACOSOG Z0011 trial established the omission of axillary lymph-node dissection (ALND) as a standard practice in certain patients with positive sentinel lymph-node biopsy (SNB). However, as the MonarchE eligibility criteria include the presence of four or more lymph-node metastases, omitting ALND may hinder the assessment of abemaciclib eligibility in some cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study population consisted of patients with clinically node-negative, HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer who underwent SNB at our institution between January 2008 and December 2021. The proportion of patients meeting the MonarchE cohort1 criteria, and the potential impact of ALND omission on abemaciclib eligibility were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 1537 patients, 189 underwent SNB followed by ALND due to the presence of one or more positive sentinel nodes. Of these, 69 (36.5%) were eligible for abemaciclib. Eligibility was uncertain without ALND in 138 patients. Among the 138 patients, 124 were candidates for ALND omission, including 11 who were found to have four or more metastatic lymph nodes after completing ALND.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A few cases were identified in which abemaciclib eligibility was not properly determined due to ALND omission. This suggests that omitting ALND following SNB, when two of fewer positive nodes are detected, may not significantly impact the determination of abemaciclib eligibility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast Cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"543-551\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-025-01684-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-025-01684-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:MonarchE试验证明了abemaciclib作为激素受体(HR)阳性her2阴性乳腺癌高危患者辅助内分泌治疗的额外益处。与此同时,ACOSOG Z0011试验确定,在某些前哨淋巴结活检(SNB)阳性的患者中,遗漏腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND)是一种标准做法。然而,由于MonarchE的资格标准包括存在四个或更多淋巴结转移,在某些情况下,忽略ALND可能会阻碍对abemaciclib资格的评估。方法:研究人群包括2008年1月至2021年12月期间在我院接受SNB治疗的临床淋巴结阴性、hr阳性、her2阴性乳腺癌患者。评估符合MonarchE队列标准的患者比例,以及ALND遗漏对abemaciclib资格的潜在影响。结果:在1537例患者中,189例因存在一个或多个阳性前哨淋巴结而行SNB后ALND。其中69例(36.5%)符合abemaciclib的治疗条件。138例无ALND患者不确定是否合格。在138例患者中,124例是遗漏ALND的候选患者,其中11例在完成ALND后发现有四个或更多转移性淋巴结。结论:少数病例由于ALND遗漏而无法正确确定abemaciclib的使用资格。这表明,当检测到两个较少的阳性淋巴结时,忽略SNB后的ALND可能不会显著影响abemaciclib资格的确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of axillary lymph-node dissection omission on adjuvant abemaciclib eligibility in HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer with positive sentinel lymph nodes.

Background: The MonarchE trial demonstrated the additional benefit of abemaciclib as an adjuvant endocrine therapy for high-risk patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive HER2-negative breast cancer. Meanwhile, the ACOSOG Z0011 trial established the omission of axillary lymph-node dissection (ALND) as a standard practice in certain patients with positive sentinel lymph-node biopsy (SNB). However, as the MonarchE eligibility criteria include the presence of four or more lymph-node metastases, omitting ALND may hinder the assessment of abemaciclib eligibility in some cases.

Methods: The study population consisted of patients with clinically node-negative, HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer who underwent SNB at our institution between January 2008 and December 2021. The proportion of patients meeting the MonarchE cohort1 criteria, and the potential impact of ALND omission on abemaciclib eligibility were assessed.

Results: Among the 1537 patients, 189 underwent SNB followed by ALND due to the presence of one or more positive sentinel nodes. Of these, 69 (36.5%) were eligible for abemaciclib. Eligibility was uncertain without ALND in 138 patients. Among the 138 patients, 124 were candidates for ALND omission, including 11 who were found to have four or more metastatic lymph nodes after completing ALND.

Conclusions: A few cases were identified in which abemaciclib eligibility was not properly determined due to ALND omission. This suggests that omitting ALND following SNB, when two of fewer positive nodes are detected, may not significantly impact the determination of abemaciclib eligibility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Breast Cancer
Breast Cancer ONCOLOGY-OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.50%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer, the official journal of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society, publishes articles that contribute to progress in the field, in basic or translational research and also in clinical research, seeking to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all who are concerned with breast cancer. The journal welcomes all original articles describing clinical and epidemiological studies and laboratory investigations regarding breast cancer and related diseases. The journal will consider five types of articles: editorials, review articles, original articles, case reports, and rapid communications. Although editorials and review articles will principally be solicited by the editors, they can also be submitted for peer review, as in the case of original articles. The journal provides the best of up-to-date information on breast cancer, presenting readers with high-impact, original work focusing on pivotal issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信