迈向更安全的矿山:分析塞尔维亚地下采矿的职业健康和安全观念及伤害模式。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jelena S Ivaz, Aleksandra N Fedajev, Dejan V Petrović, Saša S Stojadinović, Dragan M Zlatanović, Pavle Z Stojković, Milan S Stajić, Mladen B Radovanović
{"title":"迈向更安全的矿山:分析塞尔维亚地下采矿的职业健康和安全观念及伤害模式。","authors":"Jelena S Ivaz, Aleksandra N Fedajev, Dejan V Petrović, Saša S Stojadinović, Dragan M Zlatanović, Pavle Z Stojković, Milan S Stajić, Mladen B Radovanović","doi":"10.1177/10519815251314661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundMining is a high-risk sector, particularly in underground environments, where workers face daily hazards. This research evaluates workplace safety perceptions in Serbian underground coal mines, ranking workers by education, age, and job role, while incorporating injury data to provide a comprehensive assessment of safety across different worker groups.ObjectiveThis study is aimed at analyses of the correlation between occupational health and safety (OHS) perceptions and the injury index across different worker groups, to identify improvement opportunities and propose targeted measures for enhancing OHS practices.MethodsThe PROMETHEE II method categorized workers based on production units, qualifications, and age, focusing on criteria like protective equipment, work conditions, risk awareness, management, work organization, and training. The entropy method provided objective weightings for these criteria, allowing for comparison with injury index rankings to establish priorities for improvement.ResultsŠtavalj and Vrška Čuka ranked highest in OHS perception. Workers with MSc/Dr qualifications displayed heightened awareness of safety, while those aged 56 to 65 exhibited the best understanding of health and safety. Spearman rank correlation coefficients revealed a strong negative correlation (-0.796) for production units, a strong positive correlation (0.70) for qualifications, and a very strong positive correlation (0.90) for age concerning PROMETHEE II rankings and injury index indicators.ConclusionsThe disparities between worker perception rankings and injury index rankings suggest opportunities for targeted safety improvements and enhanced training protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":51373,"journal":{"name":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"2530-2546"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards safer mines: Analyzing occupational health and safety perceptions and injury patterns in Serbian underground mining.\",\"authors\":\"Jelena S Ivaz, Aleksandra N Fedajev, Dejan V Petrović, Saša S Stojadinović, Dragan M Zlatanović, Pavle Z Stojković, Milan S Stajić, Mladen B Radovanović\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10519815251314661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundMining is a high-risk sector, particularly in underground environments, where workers face daily hazards. This research evaluates workplace safety perceptions in Serbian underground coal mines, ranking workers by education, age, and job role, while incorporating injury data to provide a comprehensive assessment of safety across different worker groups.ObjectiveThis study is aimed at analyses of the correlation between occupational health and safety (OHS) perceptions and the injury index across different worker groups, to identify improvement opportunities and propose targeted measures for enhancing OHS practices.MethodsThe PROMETHEE II method categorized workers based on production units, qualifications, and age, focusing on criteria like protective equipment, work conditions, risk awareness, management, work organization, and training. The entropy method provided objective weightings for these criteria, allowing for comparison with injury index rankings to establish priorities for improvement.ResultsŠtavalj and Vrška Čuka ranked highest in OHS perception. Workers with MSc/Dr qualifications displayed heightened awareness of safety, while those aged 56 to 65 exhibited the best understanding of health and safety. Spearman rank correlation coefficients revealed a strong negative correlation (-0.796) for production units, a strong positive correlation (0.70) for qualifications, and a very strong positive correlation (0.90) for age concerning PROMETHEE II rankings and injury index indicators.ConclusionsThe disparities between worker perception rankings and injury index rankings suggest opportunities for targeted safety improvements and enhanced training protocols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2530-2546\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815251314661\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815251314661","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:采矿是一个高风险部门,特别是在地下环境中,工人每天都面临危险。本研究评估了塞尔维亚地下煤矿的工作场所安全观念,根据教育程度、年龄和工作角色对工人进行排名,同时结合伤害数据,对不同工人群体的安全进行全面评估。目的:本研究旨在分析不同工人群体职业健康与安全(OHS)观念与伤害指数之间的相关性,以确定改进机会并提出有针对性的措施来加强职业健康与安全实践。方法:PROMETHEE II方法根据生产单位、资质和年龄对工人进行分类,重点关注防护装备、工作条件、风险意识、管理、工作组织和培训等标准。熵值法为这些标准提供了客观的权重,允许与伤害指数排名进行比较,以确定改进的优先级。结果:Štavalj和Vrška Čuka对OHS的感知最高。具有硕士/博士资格的工人表现出更高的安全意识,而56岁至65岁的工人表现出对健康和安全的最佳理解。Spearman等级相关系数显示,PROMETHEE II等级与伤害指数指标与生产单位呈显著负相关(-0.796),与资质呈显著正相关(0.70),与年龄呈显著正相关(0.90)。结论:工人感知排名和伤害指数排名之间的差异表明有针对性的安全改进和加强培训方案的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards safer mines: Analyzing occupational health and safety perceptions and injury patterns in Serbian underground mining.

BackgroundMining is a high-risk sector, particularly in underground environments, where workers face daily hazards. This research evaluates workplace safety perceptions in Serbian underground coal mines, ranking workers by education, age, and job role, while incorporating injury data to provide a comprehensive assessment of safety across different worker groups.ObjectiveThis study is aimed at analyses of the correlation between occupational health and safety (OHS) perceptions and the injury index across different worker groups, to identify improvement opportunities and propose targeted measures for enhancing OHS practices.MethodsThe PROMETHEE II method categorized workers based on production units, qualifications, and age, focusing on criteria like protective equipment, work conditions, risk awareness, management, work organization, and training. The entropy method provided objective weightings for these criteria, allowing for comparison with injury index rankings to establish priorities for improvement.ResultsŠtavalj and Vrška Čuka ranked highest in OHS perception. Workers with MSc/Dr qualifications displayed heightened awareness of safety, while those aged 56 to 65 exhibited the best understanding of health and safety. Spearman rank correlation coefficients revealed a strong negative correlation (-0.796) for production units, a strong positive correlation (0.70) for qualifications, and a very strong positive correlation (0.90) for age concerning PROMETHEE II rankings and injury index indicators.ConclusionsThe disparities between worker perception rankings and injury index rankings suggest opportunities for targeted safety improvements and enhanced training protocols.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
30.40%
发文量
739
期刊介绍: WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation is an interdisciplinary, international journal which publishes high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts covering the entire scope of the occupation of work. The journal''s subtitle has been deliberately laid out: The first goal is the prevention of illness, injury, and disability. When this goal is not achievable, the attention focuses on assessment to design client-centered intervention, rehabilitation, treatment, or controls that use scientific evidence to support best practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信