GIN-McMaster指南开发清单(GDC)扩展参与。

IF 7.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jennifer Petkovic , Olivia Magwood , Thomas W. Concannon , Elie A. Akl , Joanne Khabsa , Lyubov Lytvyn , Vivian Welch , Marc T. Avey , Soumyadeep Bhaumik , Angus Gunn , Ana Marusic , Lawrence Mbuagbaw , Zachary Munn , Marisha E. Palm , Danielle Pollock , Michael Saginur , Imad Bou Akl , Thurayya Arayssi , Asma Ben Brahem , Tammy Clifford , Peter Tugwell
{"title":"GIN-McMaster指南开发清单(GDC)扩展参与。","authors":"Jennifer Petkovic ,&nbsp;Olivia Magwood ,&nbsp;Thomas W. Concannon ,&nbsp;Elie A. Akl ,&nbsp;Joanne Khabsa ,&nbsp;Lyubov Lytvyn ,&nbsp;Vivian Welch ,&nbsp;Marc T. Avey ,&nbsp;Soumyadeep Bhaumik ,&nbsp;Angus Gunn ,&nbsp;Ana Marusic ,&nbsp;Lawrence Mbuagbaw ,&nbsp;Zachary Munn ,&nbsp;Marisha E. Palm ,&nbsp;Danielle Pollock ,&nbsp;Michael Saginur ,&nbsp;Imad Bou Akl ,&nbsp;Thurayya Arayssi ,&nbsp;Asma Ben Brahem ,&nbsp;Tammy Clifford ,&nbsp;Peter Tugwell","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Better engagement of diverse groups of interest-holders in the development of health guidelines has been proposed to improve their usefulness, implementability, and acceptability. Guidelines shape clinical or public health practice decision-making. Trustworthy guidelines are systematically developed documents that include actionable statements based on evidence and a formal, structured and transparent decision process. This paper describes the Guidelines International Network (GIN)-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist (GDC) Extension for Engagement to assist developers with engaging multiple interest-holders throughout all topics of guideline development.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Setting</h3><div>To produce this checklist extension, we conducted a 3-phase mixed methods study. First, we identified 10 groups of interest-holders to be engaged in health guideline development: patients, the public, providers, program managers, principal investigators, payers/purchasers of health services, payers/funders of health research, policymakers, peer-reviewed journal editors, and product makers identified in previous work and recruited coleads to represent these groups (<em>n</em> = 26 total).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We conducted a series of reviews to identify existing methods and barriers/facilitators for engagement, approaches to managing conflicts of interest, and describe the impacts of engagement on the guideline development process. The results of these reviews informed the development of an online survey for which we received 195 responses. We clarified these results through 43 key informant interviews with interest-holders. The final GDC extension checklist was determined based on consensus methods with our coleads.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This paper presents the GIN-McMaster GDC Extension for Engagement. This checklist provides interest-holder–informed recommendations for providing advice/feedback or participating in decision-making in guideline development.</div></div><div><h3>Plain Language Summary</h3><div>Health-care guidelines are formal recommendations for diagnosing and managing medical conditions or public health concerns. The steps involved in developing guidelines include from planning the process, defining the focus of the guideline and the questions it should answer, and summarizing the evidence. The Guidelines International Network-McMaster Guideline Development checklist includes 146 steps of guideline development grouped into 18 topics. Our work extends this checklist to provide guidance on how to engage with people from different groups of ‘interest-holders’ throughout guideline development. These interest-holders include (1) patients, (2) members of the public, (3) health-care providers, (4) people who manage and operate health programs, (5) researchers, (6) people who pay for or purchase health services, (7) policymakers, (8) people who pay for health research, (9) people who publish research and guidelines, and (10) people who develop and sell health-care devices or products. We engaged with people from each of the groups to develop this guidance. Twenty-six people coled our interest-holder groups. We conducted a series or systematic reviews on (a) how to engage people in guidelines, (b) identifying the barriers and facilitators to engagement, (c) assessing the impacts of engagement, and (d) describing how to manage conflicts of interest related to engagement. These reviews were used to create a first draft of guidance. Then we conducted an online survey and gathered the opinions from 195 people from each of our interest-holder groups. We interviewed 43 interest-holders for additional information to revise the guidance and then finalized the guidance with our interest-holder coleads. This checklist provides guidance for engaging interest-holder groups throughout guideline development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 111727"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The GIN-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist extension for engagement\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Petkovic ,&nbsp;Olivia Magwood ,&nbsp;Thomas W. Concannon ,&nbsp;Elie A. Akl ,&nbsp;Joanne Khabsa ,&nbsp;Lyubov Lytvyn ,&nbsp;Vivian Welch ,&nbsp;Marc T. Avey ,&nbsp;Soumyadeep Bhaumik ,&nbsp;Angus Gunn ,&nbsp;Ana Marusic ,&nbsp;Lawrence Mbuagbaw ,&nbsp;Zachary Munn ,&nbsp;Marisha E. Palm ,&nbsp;Danielle Pollock ,&nbsp;Michael Saginur ,&nbsp;Imad Bou Akl ,&nbsp;Thurayya Arayssi ,&nbsp;Asma Ben Brahem ,&nbsp;Tammy Clifford ,&nbsp;Peter Tugwell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111727\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Better engagement of diverse groups of interest-holders in the development of health guidelines has been proposed to improve their usefulness, implementability, and acceptability. Guidelines shape clinical or public health practice decision-making. Trustworthy guidelines are systematically developed documents that include actionable statements based on evidence and a formal, structured and transparent decision process. This paper describes the Guidelines International Network (GIN)-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist (GDC) Extension for Engagement to assist developers with engaging multiple interest-holders throughout all topics of guideline development.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Setting</h3><div>To produce this checklist extension, we conducted a 3-phase mixed methods study. First, we identified 10 groups of interest-holders to be engaged in health guideline development: patients, the public, providers, program managers, principal investigators, payers/purchasers of health services, payers/funders of health research, policymakers, peer-reviewed journal editors, and product makers identified in previous work and recruited coleads to represent these groups (<em>n</em> = 26 total).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We conducted a series of reviews to identify existing methods and barriers/facilitators for engagement, approaches to managing conflicts of interest, and describe the impacts of engagement on the guideline development process. The results of these reviews informed the development of an online survey for which we received 195 responses. We clarified these results through 43 key informant interviews with interest-holders. The final GDC extension checklist was determined based on consensus methods with our coleads.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This paper presents the GIN-McMaster GDC Extension for Engagement. This checklist provides interest-holder–informed recommendations for providing advice/feedback or participating in decision-making in guideline development.</div></div><div><h3>Plain Language Summary</h3><div>Health-care guidelines are formal recommendations for diagnosing and managing medical conditions or public health concerns. The steps involved in developing guidelines include from planning the process, defining the focus of the guideline and the questions it should answer, and summarizing the evidence. The Guidelines International Network-McMaster Guideline Development checklist includes 146 steps of guideline development grouped into 18 topics. Our work extends this checklist to provide guidance on how to engage with people from different groups of ‘interest-holders’ throughout guideline development. These interest-holders include (1) patients, (2) members of the public, (3) health-care providers, (4) people who manage and operate health programs, (5) researchers, (6) people who pay for or purchase health services, (7) policymakers, (8) people who pay for health research, (9) people who publish research and guidelines, and (10) people who develop and sell health-care devices or products. We engaged with people from each of the groups to develop this guidance. Twenty-six people coled our interest-holder groups. We conducted a series or systematic reviews on (a) how to engage people in guidelines, (b) identifying the barriers and facilitators to engagement, (c) assessing the impacts of engagement, and (d) describing how to manage conflicts of interest related to engagement. These reviews were used to create a first draft of guidance. Then we conducted an online survey and gathered the opinions from 195 people from each of our interest-holder groups. We interviewed 43 interest-holders for additional information to revise the guidance and then finalized the guidance with our interest-holder coleads. This checklist provides guidance for engaging interest-holder groups throughout guideline development.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"181 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111727\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435625000605\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435625000605","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:已提议让不同利益相关者群体更好地参与卫生准则的制定,以提高其有用性、可执行性和可接受性。指导方针影响临床或公共卫生实践决策。值得信赖的指导方针是系统制定的文件,其中包括基于证据的可操作声明和正式、结构化和透明的决策过程。本文描述了GIN-McMaster GDC参与扩展,以帮助开发人员在指南开发的所有主题中参与多个利益相关者。研究设计和设置:为了产生这份清单的扩展,我们进行了一项三期混合方法研究。首先,我们利用了10组利益相关者参与健康指南的制定:患者、公众、提供者、项目经理、主要研究者、卫生服务的付款人/购买者、卫生研究的付款人/资助者、政策制定者、同行评审期刊编辑和产品制造商,并招募了共同领导代表这些群体(n=26)。结果:我们进行了一系列的回顾,以确定参与的现有方法和障碍/促进因素,管理利益冲突的方法,并描述参与对指南制定过程的影响。这些评论的结果促使我们开展了一项在线调查,我们收到了195份回复。我们通过与利益相关者的43个关键信息提供者访谈澄清了这些结果。最终的GDC扩展清单是根据我们的共同领导的共识方法确定的。结论:本文提出了GIN-McMaster的GDC用户粘性扩展。这份清单提供了利益相关者知情的建议,以便在指南制定中提供建议/反馈或参与决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The GIN-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist extension for engagement

The GIN-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist extension for engagement

Objectives

Better engagement of diverse groups of interest-holders in the development of health guidelines has been proposed to improve their usefulness, implementability, and acceptability. Guidelines shape clinical or public health practice decision-making. Trustworthy guidelines are systematically developed documents that include actionable statements based on evidence and a formal, structured and transparent decision process. This paper describes the Guidelines International Network (GIN)-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist (GDC) Extension for Engagement to assist developers with engaging multiple interest-holders throughout all topics of guideline development.

Study Design and Setting

To produce this checklist extension, we conducted a 3-phase mixed methods study. First, we identified 10 groups of interest-holders to be engaged in health guideline development: patients, the public, providers, program managers, principal investigators, payers/purchasers of health services, payers/funders of health research, policymakers, peer-reviewed journal editors, and product makers identified in previous work and recruited coleads to represent these groups (n = 26 total).

Results

We conducted a series of reviews to identify existing methods and barriers/facilitators for engagement, approaches to managing conflicts of interest, and describe the impacts of engagement on the guideline development process. The results of these reviews informed the development of an online survey for which we received 195 responses. We clarified these results through 43 key informant interviews with interest-holders. The final GDC extension checklist was determined based on consensus methods with our coleads.

Conclusion

This paper presents the GIN-McMaster GDC Extension for Engagement. This checklist provides interest-holder–informed recommendations for providing advice/feedback or participating in decision-making in guideline development.

Plain Language Summary

Health-care guidelines are formal recommendations for diagnosing and managing medical conditions or public health concerns. The steps involved in developing guidelines include from planning the process, defining the focus of the guideline and the questions it should answer, and summarizing the evidence. The Guidelines International Network-McMaster Guideline Development checklist includes 146 steps of guideline development grouped into 18 topics. Our work extends this checklist to provide guidance on how to engage with people from different groups of ‘interest-holders’ throughout guideline development. These interest-holders include (1) patients, (2) members of the public, (3) health-care providers, (4) people who manage and operate health programs, (5) researchers, (6) people who pay for or purchase health services, (7) policymakers, (8) people who pay for health research, (9) people who publish research and guidelines, and (10) people who develop and sell health-care devices or products. We engaged with people from each of the groups to develop this guidance. Twenty-six people coled our interest-holder groups. We conducted a series or systematic reviews on (a) how to engage people in guidelines, (b) identifying the barriers and facilitators to engagement, (c) assessing the impacts of engagement, and (d) describing how to manage conflicts of interest related to engagement. These reviews were used to create a first draft of guidance. Then we conducted an online survey and gathered the opinions from 195 people from each of our interest-holder groups. We interviewed 43 interest-holders for additional information to revise the guidance and then finalized the guidance with our interest-holder coleads. This checklist provides guidance for engaging interest-holder groups throughout guideline development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
320
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Epidemiology strives to enhance the quality of clinical and patient-oriented healthcare research by advancing and applying innovative methods in conducting, presenting, synthesizing, disseminating, and translating research results into optimal clinical practice. Special emphasis is placed on training new generations of scientists and clinical practice leaders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信